C. Tonkin, A. Duchowski, Joshua Kahue, Paul Schiffgens, Frank Rischner
{"title":"对大大小小的购物展示进行眼动追踪","authors":"C. Tonkin, A. Duchowski, Joshua Kahue, Paul Schiffgens, Frank Rischner","doi":"10.1145/2029956.2029970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Consumers' visual behavior is compared when shopping for a product on simulated shelving displays of two different sizes: a 11.5 ft. projection canvas and a 15.4 in. laptop screen. Results are compared with search times obtained over virtual (projected) and physical shelves, where recorded search times indicate a tendency toward improved performance with larger displays. Implications for pervasive eye tracking systems indicate consideration of larger, realistic environments.","PeriodicalId":405392,"journal":{"name":"PETMEI '11","volume":"82 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Eye tracking over small and large shopping displays\",\"authors\":\"C. Tonkin, A. Duchowski, Joshua Kahue, Paul Schiffgens, Frank Rischner\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2029956.2029970\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Consumers' visual behavior is compared when shopping for a product on simulated shelving displays of two different sizes: a 11.5 ft. projection canvas and a 15.4 in. laptop screen. Results are compared with search times obtained over virtual (projected) and physical shelves, where recorded search times indicate a tendency toward improved performance with larger displays. Implications for pervasive eye tracking systems indicate consideration of larger, realistic environments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":405392,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PETMEI '11\",\"volume\":\"82 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PETMEI '11\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2029956.2029970\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PETMEI '11","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2029956.2029970","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Eye tracking over small and large shopping displays
Consumers' visual behavior is compared when shopping for a product on simulated shelving displays of two different sizes: a 11.5 ft. projection canvas and a 15.4 in. laptop screen. Results are compared with search times obtained over virtual (projected) and physical shelves, where recorded search times indicate a tendency toward improved performance with larger displays. Implications for pervasive eye tracking systems indicate consideration of larger, realistic environments.