{"title":"追赶还是排挤?追赶退休供款对非退休储蓄的挤出效应","authors":"Lucas W. Goodman","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3532426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Using tax data, this paper exploits a discontinuous increase in retirement contribution limits based on exact date of birth. This paper finds clear evidence that constrained individuals increase their retirement saving when so eligible, but finds no evidence suggesting that non-retirement saving falls. In the baseline specifications, one can rule out crowd-out greater than approximately 0.38 to 0.57 at the 95% confidence level depending on the measure used. This suggests that the additional contributions induced by catch-up eligibility represent an increase in total private saving.","PeriodicalId":407792,"journal":{"name":"Pension Risk Management eJournal","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Catching Up or Crowding Out? The Crowd-Out Effects of Catch-Up Retirement Contributions on Non-Retirement Saving\",\"authors\":\"Lucas W. Goodman\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3532426\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Using tax data, this paper exploits a discontinuous increase in retirement contribution limits based on exact date of birth. This paper finds clear evidence that constrained individuals increase their retirement saving when so eligible, but finds no evidence suggesting that non-retirement saving falls. In the baseline specifications, one can rule out crowd-out greater than approximately 0.38 to 0.57 at the 95% confidence level depending on the measure used. This suggests that the additional contributions induced by catch-up eligibility represent an increase in total private saving.\",\"PeriodicalId\":407792,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pension Risk Management eJournal\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pension Risk Management eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3532426\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pension Risk Management eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3532426","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Catching Up or Crowding Out? The Crowd-Out Effects of Catch-Up Retirement Contributions on Non-Retirement Saving
Abstract Using tax data, this paper exploits a discontinuous increase in retirement contribution limits based on exact date of birth. This paper finds clear evidence that constrained individuals increase their retirement saving when so eligible, but finds no evidence suggesting that non-retirement saving falls. In the baseline specifications, one can rule out crowd-out greater than approximately 0.38 to 0.57 at the 95% confidence level depending on the measure used. This suggests that the additional contributions induced by catch-up eligibility represent an increase in total private saving.