论上访抗辩理由范围内的税法司法

Serkan Ağar
{"title":"论上访抗辩理由范围内的税法司法","authors":"Serkan Ağar","doi":"10.26650/pb/ss10.2019.001.082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, the emerging perception differences to the detriment of the individual with regard to the grounds for challenge of petitions in public receivables disputes before the administrative courts have been assessed and several recommendations and criticisms have been put forth within this framework.","PeriodicalId":313557,"journal":{"name":"34. International Public Finance Conference","volume":"256 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rendering Tax Law Judicial Within the Scope of the Grounds for Challenge of Petitions\",\"authors\":\"Serkan Ağar\",\"doi\":\"10.26650/pb/ss10.2019.001.082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this study, the emerging perception differences to the detriment of the individual with regard to the grounds for challenge of petitions in public receivables disputes before the administrative courts have been assessed and several recommendations and criticisms have been put forth within this framework.\",\"PeriodicalId\":313557,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"34. International Public Finance Conference\",\"volume\":\"256 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"34. International Public Finance Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26650/pb/ss10.2019.001.082\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"34. International Public Finance Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26650/pb/ss10.2019.001.082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这项研究中,评估了在行政法院审理公共应收款纠纷中对请愿提出质疑的理由方面出现的不利于个人的看法差异,并在这个框架内提出了一些建议和批评。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rendering Tax Law Judicial Within the Scope of the Grounds for Challenge of Petitions
In this study, the emerging perception differences to the detriment of the individual with regard to the grounds for challenge of petitions in public receivables disputes before the administrative courts have been assessed and several recommendations and criticisms have been put forth within this framework.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信