Wahyuddin, Subandi Wahyudi, Ahmad Kautsar
{"title":"Komparasi Penerapan Metode Simple Additive Weighting Dengan Weighted Product Dalam Seleksi Trainer","authors":"Wahyuddin, Subandi Wahyudi, Ahmad Kautsar","doi":"10.37859/jf.v11i3.3086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PT Chandra Asri Petrochemical Tbk (CAP) is the largest Polypropylene producer in Indonesia and was founded in 1984. For the sustainability of the company's operations, PT CAP constantly updates, both in the field of information technology and the capabilities of human resources within the company. Improving the ability of human resources in the field of information technology and aspects of information technology training (IT Training) is important to ensure that skilled human resources are ready to answer challenges in the use of information technology. In ensuring that trainers are selected to train human resources to be reliable and competitive, appropriate and accurate decisions are needed. The Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) and Weighted Product (WP) methods are methods that can be used in the decision-making process. The comparison of the two methods can help maximize the trainer selection decision-making process. The results of the implementation of the two methods are the same ranking order, the first rank in both methods is achieved by the third alternative. The final result obtained from the ranking process using the SAW (Simple Additive Weightingmethod)obtained the largest value as the best alternative with a value of 0.85. The final result obtained from the ranking process using the WP (methodWeighted Product)obtained the largest value as the best alternative with a value of 0.2308.","PeriodicalId":145740,"journal":{"name":"JURNAL FASILKOM","volume":"285 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JURNAL FASILKOM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37859/jf.v11i3.3086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

PT Chandra Asri石化Tbk (CAP)是印度尼西亚最大的聚丙烯生产商,成立于1984年。为了公司运营的可持续性,PT CAP不断更新,无论是在信息技术领域还是在公司内部的人力资源能力。提高人力资源在信息技术领域和信息技术培训方面的能力(IT培训)对于确保熟练的人力资源准备好应对信息技术使用中的挑战非常重要。在确保选定培训人员培训人力资源,使其成为可靠和有竞争力的人时,需要作出适当和准确的决定。简单加性加权法(SAW)和加权积法(WP)是可用于决策过程的方法。两种方法的比较有助于最大限度地优化教练员的选择决策过程。两种方法实施的结果排序顺序相同,两种方法中的第一名是由第三名替代实现的。采用简单加性加权法(Simple Additive Weightingmethod, SAW)进行排序,最终得到的结果值最大,为最佳备选方案,值为0.85。使用WP (methodWeighted Product)进行排序过程得到的最终结果为最佳备选方案,其值最大,为0.2308。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Komparasi Penerapan Metode Simple Additive Weighting Dengan Weighted Product Dalam Seleksi Trainer
PT Chandra Asri Petrochemical Tbk (CAP) is the largest Polypropylene producer in Indonesia and was founded in 1984. For the sustainability of the company's operations, PT CAP constantly updates, both in the field of information technology and the capabilities of human resources within the company. Improving the ability of human resources in the field of information technology and aspects of information technology training (IT Training) is important to ensure that skilled human resources are ready to answer challenges in the use of information technology. In ensuring that trainers are selected to train human resources to be reliable and competitive, appropriate and accurate decisions are needed. The Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) and Weighted Product (WP) methods are methods that can be used in the decision-making process. The comparison of the two methods can help maximize the trainer selection decision-making process. The results of the implementation of the two methods are the same ranking order, the first rank in both methods is achieved by the third alternative. The final result obtained from the ranking process using the SAW (Simple Additive Weightingmethod)obtained the largest value as the best alternative with a value of 0.85. The final result obtained from the ranking process using the WP (methodWeighted Product)obtained the largest value as the best alternative with a value of 0.2308.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信