知识、态度和观念对哮喘患儿服药依从性的影响

Andrea Shu Xian Chiang, Ai Huay Teo, Guan Tain Lee, Soh Yan Tan, Mary Hoon, O. Chay, A. Goh, Yi Hua Tan, Z. Cheng, A. Pugalenthi, O. Teoh, B. Thomas
{"title":"知识、态度和观念对哮喘患儿服药依从性的影响","authors":"Andrea Shu Xian Chiang, Ai Huay Teo, Guan Tain Lee, Soh Yan Tan, Mary Hoon, O. Chay, A. Goh, Yi Hua Tan, Z. Cheng, A. Pugalenthi, O. Teoh, B. Thomas","doi":"10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.pa5430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Poor medication adherence is a common cause of persistent poor control in children with asthma. Aim: To assess the impact of knowledge, attitude and perceptions about asthma, on medication adherence in children with asthma. Methods: In this prospective study, children aged 7-18 years with asthma had comprehensive clinical assessment and spirometry. A 31 item questionnaire to assess the knowledge, attitude and perceptions (KAP questionnaire) about asthma was administered. Medication adherence was assessed by a combination of self reporting, pharmacy records review, inhaler check, and tablet counting, as appropriate; and was classified into 3 groups (good, average and poor). Asthma control was assessed as controlled, partly controlled or uncontrolled based on the GINA criteria. Results: 180 children (mean [SD] age=11.4 [2.8] years, 59.4% males) were studied. Adherence was good in 101 (56.1%), average in 56 (31.1%) and poor in 23 (12.8) children. The proportion (mean [95% CI]) of appropriate responses on the KAP questionnaire in those with poor adherence (47.7 [41.2-54.2]%) was significantly lower compared to those with good (57.2 [53.4-60.9]%) and average (52.5 [49.1-55.8]%) adherence (p=0.0433). Asthma control was good in 47.5% with good adherence, compared to 33.8% with average or poor adherence (p=0.0031). Significant bronchodilator reversibility in FEV1 (≥12%) was observed in 23.7% with good adherence, compared to 39.2% with average or poor adherence (p=0.0338). Conclusions: Our data suggest that knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions about asthma affect medication adherence and asthma control. Hence, improving these should be a key focus in the management of asthma.","PeriodicalId":114886,"journal":{"name":"Paediatric asthma and allergy","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of knowledge, attitude and perceptions on medication adherence in children with asthma\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Shu Xian Chiang, Ai Huay Teo, Guan Tain Lee, Soh Yan Tan, Mary Hoon, O. Chay, A. Goh, Yi Hua Tan, Z. Cheng, A. Pugalenthi, O. Teoh, B. Thomas\",\"doi\":\"10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.pa5430\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Poor medication adherence is a common cause of persistent poor control in children with asthma. Aim: To assess the impact of knowledge, attitude and perceptions about asthma, on medication adherence in children with asthma. Methods: In this prospective study, children aged 7-18 years with asthma had comprehensive clinical assessment and spirometry. A 31 item questionnaire to assess the knowledge, attitude and perceptions (KAP questionnaire) about asthma was administered. Medication adherence was assessed by a combination of self reporting, pharmacy records review, inhaler check, and tablet counting, as appropriate; and was classified into 3 groups (good, average and poor). Asthma control was assessed as controlled, partly controlled or uncontrolled based on the GINA criteria. Results: 180 children (mean [SD] age=11.4 [2.8] years, 59.4% males) were studied. Adherence was good in 101 (56.1%), average in 56 (31.1%) and poor in 23 (12.8) children. The proportion (mean [95% CI]) of appropriate responses on the KAP questionnaire in those with poor adherence (47.7 [41.2-54.2]%) was significantly lower compared to those with good (57.2 [53.4-60.9]%) and average (52.5 [49.1-55.8]%) adherence (p=0.0433). Asthma control was good in 47.5% with good adherence, compared to 33.8% with average or poor adherence (p=0.0031). Significant bronchodilator reversibility in FEV1 (≥12%) was observed in 23.7% with good adherence, compared to 39.2% with average or poor adherence (p=0.0338). Conclusions: Our data suggest that knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions about asthma affect medication adherence and asthma control. Hence, improving these should be a key focus in the management of asthma.\",\"PeriodicalId\":114886,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Paediatric asthma and allergy\",\"volume\":\"78 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Paediatric asthma and allergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.pa5430\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paediatric asthma and allergy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.pa5430","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

药物依从性差是哮喘儿童持续控制不良的常见原因。目的:评估哮喘知识、态度和认知对哮喘患儿药物依从性的影响。方法:在这项前瞻性研究中,对7-18岁的哮喘患儿进行综合临床评估和肺活量测定。采用31项哮喘知识、态度和认知问卷(KAP)进行评估。通过自我报告、药房记录审查、吸入器检查和片剂计数(视情况而定)相结合的方式评估药物依从性;并被分为3组(良好,一般和差)。根据GINA标准将哮喘控制分为控制、部分控制和不控制。结果:共纳入180例儿童,平均[SD]年龄=11.4[2.8]岁,其中男性占59.4%。101例患儿依从性良好(56.1%),56例患儿依从性一般(31.1%),23例患儿依从性较差(12.8%)。依从性差的患者(47.7%[41.2-54.2]%)正确回答KAP问卷的比例(平均[95% CI])明显低于依从性好的患者(57.2[53.4-60.9]%)和平均依从性患者(52.5 [49.1-55.8]%)(p=0.0433)。47.5%的依从性良好的患者哮喘控制良好,33.8%的依从性一般或较差(p=0.0031)。23.7%的依从性良好的患者FEV1支气管扩张剂可逆性显著(≥12%),而39.2%的依从性一般或较差(p=0.0338)。结论:我们的数据表明,关于哮喘的知识、态度和认知影响药物依从性和哮喘控制。因此,改善这些应是哮喘管理的重点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of knowledge, attitude and perceptions on medication adherence in children with asthma
Introduction: Poor medication adherence is a common cause of persistent poor control in children with asthma. Aim: To assess the impact of knowledge, attitude and perceptions about asthma, on medication adherence in children with asthma. Methods: In this prospective study, children aged 7-18 years with asthma had comprehensive clinical assessment and spirometry. A 31 item questionnaire to assess the knowledge, attitude and perceptions (KAP questionnaire) about asthma was administered. Medication adherence was assessed by a combination of self reporting, pharmacy records review, inhaler check, and tablet counting, as appropriate; and was classified into 3 groups (good, average and poor). Asthma control was assessed as controlled, partly controlled or uncontrolled based on the GINA criteria. Results: 180 children (mean [SD] age=11.4 [2.8] years, 59.4% males) were studied. Adherence was good in 101 (56.1%), average in 56 (31.1%) and poor in 23 (12.8) children. The proportion (mean [95% CI]) of appropriate responses on the KAP questionnaire in those with poor adherence (47.7 [41.2-54.2]%) was significantly lower compared to those with good (57.2 [53.4-60.9]%) and average (52.5 [49.1-55.8]%) adherence (p=0.0433). Asthma control was good in 47.5% with good adherence, compared to 33.8% with average or poor adherence (p=0.0031). Significant bronchodilator reversibility in FEV1 (≥12%) was observed in 23.7% with good adherence, compared to 39.2% with average or poor adherence (p=0.0338). Conclusions: Our data suggest that knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions about asthma affect medication adherence and asthma control. Hence, improving these should be a key focus in the management of asthma.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信