腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术中阳性手术切缘和膀胱颈部保留

K. Zougkas, G. Kotakidis, A. Petas, K. Marantidis, Katerina Aleksandridi
{"title":"腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术中阳性手术切缘和膀胱颈部保留","authors":"K. Zougkas, G. Kotakidis, A. Petas, K. Marantidis, Katerina Aleksandridi","doi":"10.19264/HJ.V31I2.265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study is to evaluate the result of bladder neck sparing technique associated with positive surgical margins in patients operated with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. MATERIAL AND METHOD: We analyze data from 17 patients with localized PCa patients treated with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy while preserve the bladder neck. In all patients, an intra-operative biopsy was performed from the bladder neck while topographic histological findings, potential positive margins and urinary continence after 3.6 and 12 months were presented. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 65.17 (range 56 to 70). The mean PSA was 6.14 ng/ml (range 3.2 to 10.1), and the most common Gleason Score was 6 (range 6 to 8). In all cases the biopsy from the bladder neck was negative. Sixteen men (94.1%) had clinical stage pT2 and 1 (5.9%) were pT3a. Positive surgical margins were found at the top of the prostate in only 1 case whereas 11, 13 and 15 patients were normalized at 3.6.12 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: It seems in our patients, that the bladder neck sparing technique is not associated with the increase incidence of positive surgical margins and can also be performed","PeriodicalId":185530,"journal":{"name":"Hellenic Urology","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Positive surgical margins and bladder neck sparing during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy\",\"authors\":\"K. Zougkas, G. Kotakidis, A. Petas, K. Marantidis, Katerina Aleksandridi\",\"doi\":\"10.19264/HJ.V31I2.265\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study is to evaluate the result of bladder neck sparing technique associated with positive surgical margins in patients operated with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. MATERIAL AND METHOD: We analyze data from 17 patients with localized PCa patients treated with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy while preserve the bladder neck. In all patients, an intra-operative biopsy was performed from the bladder neck while topographic histological findings, potential positive margins and urinary continence after 3.6 and 12 months were presented. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 65.17 (range 56 to 70). The mean PSA was 6.14 ng/ml (range 3.2 to 10.1), and the most common Gleason Score was 6 (range 6 to 8). In all cases the biopsy from the bladder neck was negative. Sixteen men (94.1%) had clinical stage pT2 and 1 (5.9%) were pT3a. Positive surgical margins were found at the top of the prostate in only 1 case whereas 11, 13 and 15 patients were normalized at 3.6.12 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: It seems in our patients, that the bladder neck sparing technique is not associated with the increase incidence of positive surgical margins and can also be performed\",\"PeriodicalId\":185530,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hellenic Urology\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hellenic Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19264/HJ.V31I2.265\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hellenic Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19264/HJ.V31I2.265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:本研究的目的是评估腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术患者膀胱颈部保留技术与阳性手术切缘相关的结果。材料和方法:我们分析了17例局部前列腺癌患者的资料,这些患者在腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术中保留了膀胱颈部。所有患者术中均对膀胱颈部进行活检,并在3.6个月和12个月后呈现地形组织学结果、潜在阳性边缘和尿失禁。结果:患者平均年龄为65.17岁(56 ~ 70岁)。平均PSA为6.14 ng/ml(范围3.2至10.1),最常见的Gleason评分为6(范围6至8)。所有病例的膀胱颈部活检均为阴性。pT2期16例(94.1%),pT3a期1例(5.9%)。仅1例在前列腺顶部发现手术切缘阳性,而在3.6.12个月时分别有11例、13例和15例正常。结论:在我们的患者中,膀胱颈保留技术似乎与阳性手术切缘发生率的增加无关,也可以进行
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Positive surgical margins and bladder neck sparing during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study is to evaluate the result of bladder neck sparing technique associated with positive surgical margins in patients operated with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. MATERIAL AND METHOD: We analyze data from 17 patients with localized PCa patients treated with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy while preserve the bladder neck. In all patients, an intra-operative biopsy was performed from the bladder neck while topographic histological findings, potential positive margins and urinary continence after 3.6 and 12 months were presented. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 65.17 (range 56 to 70). The mean PSA was 6.14 ng/ml (range 3.2 to 10.1), and the most common Gleason Score was 6 (range 6 to 8). In all cases the biopsy from the bladder neck was negative. Sixteen men (94.1%) had clinical stage pT2 and 1 (5.9%) were pT3a. Positive surgical margins were found at the top of the prostate in only 1 case whereas 11, 13 and 15 patients were normalized at 3.6.12 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: It seems in our patients, that the bladder neck sparing technique is not associated with the increase incidence of positive surgical margins and can also be performed
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信