K. Zougkas, G. Kotakidis, A. Petas, K. Marantidis, Katerina Aleksandridi
{"title":"腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术中阳性手术切缘和膀胱颈部保留","authors":"K. Zougkas, G. Kotakidis, A. Petas, K. Marantidis, Katerina Aleksandridi","doi":"10.19264/HJ.V31I2.265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study is to evaluate the result of bladder neck sparing technique associated with positive surgical margins in patients operated with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. MATERIAL AND METHOD: We analyze data from 17 patients with localized PCa patients treated with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy while preserve the bladder neck. In all patients, an intra-operative biopsy was performed from the bladder neck while topographic histological findings, potential positive margins and urinary continence after 3.6 and 12 months were presented. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 65.17 (range 56 to 70). The mean PSA was 6.14 ng/ml (range 3.2 to 10.1), and the most common Gleason Score was 6 (range 6 to 8). In all cases the biopsy from the bladder neck was negative. Sixteen men (94.1%) had clinical stage pT2 and 1 (5.9%) were pT3a. Positive surgical margins were found at the top of the prostate in only 1 case whereas 11, 13 and 15 patients were normalized at 3.6.12 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: It seems in our patients, that the bladder neck sparing technique is not associated with the increase incidence of positive surgical margins and can also be performed","PeriodicalId":185530,"journal":{"name":"Hellenic Urology","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Positive surgical margins and bladder neck sparing during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy\",\"authors\":\"K. Zougkas, G. Kotakidis, A. Petas, K. Marantidis, Katerina Aleksandridi\",\"doi\":\"10.19264/HJ.V31I2.265\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study is to evaluate the result of bladder neck sparing technique associated with positive surgical margins in patients operated with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. MATERIAL AND METHOD: We analyze data from 17 patients with localized PCa patients treated with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy while preserve the bladder neck. In all patients, an intra-operative biopsy was performed from the bladder neck while topographic histological findings, potential positive margins and urinary continence after 3.6 and 12 months were presented. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 65.17 (range 56 to 70). The mean PSA was 6.14 ng/ml (range 3.2 to 10.1), and the most common Gleason Score was 6 (range 6 to 8). In all cases the biopsy from the bladder neck was negative. Sixteen men (94.1%) had clinical stage pT2 and 1 (5.9%) were pT3a. Positive surgical margins were found at the top of the prostate in only 1 case whereas 11, 13 and 15 patients were normalized at 3.6.12 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: It seems in our patients, that the bladder neck sparing technique is not associated with the increase incidence of positive surgical margins and can also be performed\",\"PeriodicalId\":185530,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hellenic Urology\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hellenic Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19264/HJ.V31I2.265\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hellenic Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19264/HJ.V31I2.265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Positive surgical margins and bladder neck sparing during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study is to evaluate the result of bladder neck sparing technique associated with positive surgical margins in patients operated with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. MATERIAL AND METHOD: We analyze data from 17 patients with localized PCa patients treated with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy while preserve the bladder neck. In all patients, an intra-operative biopsy was performed from the bladder neck while topographic histological findings, potential positive margins and urinary continence after 3.6 and 12 months were presented. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 65.17 (range 56 to 70). The mean PSA was 6.14 ng/ml (range 3.2 to 10.1), and the most common Gleason Score was 6 (range 6 to 8). In all cases the biopsy from the bladder neck was negative. Sixteen men (94.1%) had clinical stage pT2 and 1 (5.9%) were pT3a. Positive surgical margins were found at the top of the prostate in only 1 case whereas 11, 13 and 15 patients were normalized at 3.6.12 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: It seems in our patients, that the bladder neck sparing technique is not associated with the increase incidence of positive surgical margins and can also be performed