{"title":"银行为何持有超额准备金?:预防性需求还是货币政策因素?","authors":"Takeshi Osada","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3021758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper empirically investigates why Japanese banks have held large excess reserves for almost two decades, not only in crisis periods but also in peacetime. Examining the panel data for commercial banks over the period FY 1991–2007, we identify two factors that explain their demand for reserves: a short-term inter-bank money market rate (opportunity costs), and the Tier 1 capital adequacy ratio (precautionary demands). The former is often pointed out as a factor by previous literature, while the latter is our contributed new finding to the literature on reserves accumulation. We found the positive relationship between banks’ capital and their excess reserve holding, or liquidity holdings. This finding has an implication for the current financial regulatory reforms, monetary and macro-prudential policies.","PeriodicalId":441240,"journal":{"name":"Financial Regulations submissions","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why Do Banks Hold Excess Reserves?: Precautionary Demands or Monetary Policy Factors?\",\"authors\":\"Takeshi Osada\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3021758\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper empirically investigates why Japanese banks have held large excess reserves for almost two decades, not only in crisis periods but also in peacetime. Examining the panel data for commercial banks over the period FY 1991–2007, we identify two factors that explain their demand for reserves: a short-term inter-bank money market rate (opportunity costs), and the Tier 1 capital adequacy ratio (precautionary demands). The former is often pointed out as a factor by previous literature, while the latter is our contributed new finding to the literature on reserves accumulation. We found the positive relationship between banks’ capital and their excess reserve holding, or liquidity holdings. This finding has an implication for the current financial regulatory reforms, monetary and macro-prudential policies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":441240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Financial Regulations submissions\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Financial Regulations submissions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3021758\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Financial Regulations submissions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3021758","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Why Do Banks Hold Excess Reserves?: Precautionary Demands or Monetary Policy Factors?
This paper empirically investigates why Japanese banks have held large excess reserves for almost two decades, not only in crisis periods but also in peacetime. Examining the panel data for commercial banks over the period FY 1991–2007, we identify two factors that explain their demand for reserves: a short-term inter-bank money market rate (opportunity costs), and the Tier 1 capital adequacy ratio (precautionary demands). The former is often pointed out as a factor by previous literature, while the latter is our contributed new finding to the literature on reserves accumulation. We found the positive relationship between banks’ capital and their excess reserve holding, or liquidity holdings. This finding has an implication for the current financial regulatory reforms, monetary and macro-prudential policies.