考虑35小时风暴条件的大直径单桩动力响应

E. Bachynski, A. Page, G. Katsikogiannis
{"title":"考虑35小时风暴条件的大直径单桩动力响应","authors":"E. Bachynski, A. Page, G. Katsikogiannis","doi":"10.1115/omae2019-95170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n As a part of the assessment of foundation resistance for monopiles, several offshore wind standards prescribe symmetric 35-hour (or 42-hour) storm sequences in terms of wind speed and significant wave height. The temporal evolution of the peak period is not specified explicitly in the standards, despite the fact that large monopile wind turbines are sensitive to the wave period. In the present work, the storm sequences according to the standards are first compared to hindcast data for intermediate water depth locations in the North Sea. An alternative storm sequence is proposed based on the hindcast data, and possible values of the peak period evolution are proposed for the standard models. The responses of a 10 MW monopile wind turbine are then computed for both the standard and proposed sequences using a time domain aero-hydro-servo-elastic code coupled to a macro element model for the soil-structure interaction. The resulting mudline load cycles are then compared for the different storm sequences.","PeriodicalId":306681,"journal":{"name":"Volume 10: Ocean Renewable Energy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dynamic Response of a Large-Diameter Monopile Considering 35-Hour Storm Conditions\",\"authors\":\"E. Bachynski, A. Page, G. Katsikogiannis\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/omae2019-95170\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n As a part of the assessment of foundation resistance for monopiles, several offshore wind standards prescribe symmetric 35-hour (or 42-hour) storm sequences in terms of wind speed and significant wave height. The temporal evolution of the peak period is not specified explicitly in the standards, despite the fact that large monopile wind turbines are sensitive to the wave period. In the present work, the storm sequences according to the standards are first compared to hindcast data for intermediate water depth locations in the North Sea. An alternative storm sequence is proposed based on the hindcast data, and possible values of the peak period evolution are proposed for the standard models. The responses of a 10 MW monopile wind turbine are then computed for both the standard and proposed sequences using a time domain aero-hydro-servo-elastic code coupled to a macro element model for the soil-structure interaction. The resulting mudline load cycles are then compared for the different storm sequences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":306681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 10: Ocean Renewable Energy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 10: Ocean Renewable Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/omae2019-95170\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 10: Ocean Renewable Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/omae2019-95170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

作为单桩基础阻力评估的一部分,几个海上风标准规定了风速和有效浪高方面的对称35小时(或42小时)风暴序列。尽管大型单桩风力机对波浪周期很敏感,但标准中没有明确规定峰值周期的时间演变。在本工作中,首先将标准的风暴序列与北海中水深位置的后验数据进行了比较。在此基础上提出了一种备选风暴序列,并对标准模式提出了可能的峰值演化值。采用时域气动-水力-伺服-弹性代码与土-结构相互作用的宏观单元模型耦合,计算了标准序列和建议序列下10mw单桩风力发电机的响应。然后对不同风暴序列的泥线负荷周期进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dynamic Response of a Large-Diameter Monopile Considering 35-Hour Storm Conditions
As a part of the assessment of foundation resistance for monopiles, several offshore wind standards prescribe symmetric 35-hour (or 42-hour) storm sequences in terms of wind speed and significant wave height. The temporal evolution of the peak period is not specified explicitly in the standards, despite the fact that large monopile wind turbines are sensitive to the wave period. In the present work, the storm sequences according to the standards are first compared to hindcast data for intermediate water depth locations in the North Sea. An alternative storm sequence is proposed based on the hindcast data, and possible values of the peak period evolution are proposed for the standard models. The responses of a 10 MW monopile wind turbine are then computed for both the standard and proposed sequences using a time domain aero-hydro-servo-elastic code coupled to a macro element model for the soil-structure interaction. The resulting mudline load cycles are then compared for the different storm sequences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信