快速脲酶试验与组织学联合诊断幽门螺杆菌感染

Virgilio S Lo Jr, Carmelita D Dado-Dalupang
{"title":"快速脲酶试验与组织学联合诊断幽门螺杆菌感染","authors":"Virgilio S Lo Jr, Carmelita D Dado-Dalupang","doi":"10.35460/2546-1621.2022-sp10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Significance: Accurate detection of Helicobacter pylori (HP) is essential for the diagnosis of HP infection. The use of antibiotics and proton pump inhibitors (PPI) may result in false-negative rapid urease test (RUT) results. We aimed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of RUT compared with histology and assess the detection rate of combined RUT and histology for HP infection. Methodology: Retrospective data collection was performed on 192 patients who were tested for both RUT and histology at the time of upper endoscopy from 2017 to 2018. At least two gastric biopsies (1 from corpus, 1 from antrum) were taken each for RUT and histology. The endoscopy was performed by a single gastroenterologist and a single pathologist was responsible for interpreting the histology with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and Giemsa stain. The gold standard test for the diagnosis of HP infection was histology. Demographic profile, RUT and histology results were reviewed. Tests for diagnostic accuracy were computed using SPSSv23. Results: 192 patients were tested for RUT and histology. 52(27.1%) were males and 140(72.9%) were females with a mean age of 54±17 years. Epigastric pain was the most common indication (42.7%). 24(12.5%) patients tested positive for HP infection. Among these; 16(8.3%) tested positive for both RUT and histology(true-positive), while 8(4.2%) tested negative for RUT but had positive histology(false-negative). 6 out of 8(75%) patients with false negative results had PPI use. The sensitivity and specificity of RUT for the diagnosis of HP infection were 66.7 and 98.2%, respectively. While the positive and negative likelihood ratio were 37.3 and 0.34, respectively with a diagnostic odds ratio of 110. Conclusion: The HP detection rate of RUT combined with histology increased by 33% compared with RUT alone. RUT is a highly specific test for diagnosing HP infection. Given its modest sensitivity, histology plays an important role in the diagnosis of HP infection, especially in patients taking PPIs. We recommend doing histology when RUT is negative to increase the HP detection rate. Key words: retrospective, helicobacter pylori, rapid urease test, histology, RUT, giemsa stain","PeriodicalId":399180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medicine, University of Santo Tomas","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combined Rapid Urease Test and Histology For The Diagnosis of Helicobacter Pylori Infection\",\"authors\":\"Virgilio S Lo Jr, Carmelita D Dado-Dalupang\",\"doi\":\"10.35460/2546-1621.2022-sp10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Significance: Accurate detection of Helicobacter pylori (HP) is essential for the diagnosis of HP infection. The use of antibiotics and proton pump inhibitors (PPI) may result in false-negative rapid urease test (RUT) results. We aimed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of RUT compared with histology and assess the detection rate of combined RUT and histology for HP infection. Methodology: Retrospective data collection was performed on 192 patients who were tested for both RUT and histology at the time of upper endoscopy from 2017 to 2018. At least two gastric biopsies (1 from corpus, 1 from antrum) were taken each for RUT and histology. The endoscopy was performed by a single gastroenterologist and a single pathologist was responsible for interpreting the histology with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and Giemsa stain. The gold standard test for the diagnosis of HP infection was histology. Demographic profile, RUT and histology results were reviewed. Tests for diagnostic accuracy were computed using SPSSv23. Results: 192 patients were tested for RUT and histology. 52(27.1%) were males and 140(72.9%) were females with a mean age of 54±17 years. Epigastric pain was the most common indication (42.7%). 24(12.5%) patients tested positive for HP infection. Among these; 16(8.3%) tested positive for both RUT and histology(true-positive), while 8(4.2%) tested negative for RUT but had positive histology(false-negative). 6 out of 8(75%) patients with false negative results had PPI use. The sensitivity and specificity of RUT for the diagnosis of HP infection were 66.7 and 98.2%, respectively. While the positive and negative likelihood ratio were 37.3 and 0.34, respectively with a diagnostic odds ratio of 110. Conclusion: The HP detection rate of RUT combined with histology increased by 33% compared with RUT alone. RUT is a highly specific test for diagnosing HP infection. Given its modest sensitivity, histology plays an important role in the diagnosis of HP infection, especially in patients taking PPIs. We recommend doing histology when RUT is negative to increase the HP detection rate. Key words: retrospective, helicobacter pylori, rapid urease test, histology, RUT, giemsa stain\",\"PeriodicalId\":399180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medicine, University of Santo Tomas\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medicine, University of Santo Tomas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35460/2546-1621.2022-sp10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medicine, University of Santo Tomas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35460/2546-1621.2022-sp10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

意义:准确检测幽门螺杆菌(Helicobacter pylori, HP)对HP感染的诊断至关重要。使用抗生素和质子泵抑制剂(PPI)可能导致快速脲酶试验(RUT)结果假阴性。我们的目的是比较RUT与组织学的敏感性和特异性,评估RUT与组织学联合检测HP感染的检出率。方法:回顾性收集2017年至2018年192例在上内镜检查时进行RUT和组织学检查的患者的资料。至少进行两次胃活检(1次来自胃体,1次来自胃窦),检查胃黏膜炎和组织学。内窥镜检查由一名胃肠病学家完成,一名病理学家负责用苏木精和伊红(H&E)和吉姆萨染色解释组织学。诊断HP感染的金标准检验是组织学检查。回顾了人口统计学、RUT和组织学结果。使用SPSSv23计算诊断准确性测试。结果:192例患者进行了RUT和组织学检查。男性52例(27.1%),女性140例(72.9%),平均年龄54±17岁。上腹疼痛是最常见的适应症(42.7%)。24例(12.5%)患者HP感染检测呈阳性。在这些;16例(8.3%)RUT和组织学检测均阳性(真阳性),8例(4.2%)RUT检测阴性但组织学阳性(假阴性)。8例假阴性患者中有6例(75%)使用了PPI。RUT诊断HP感染的敏感性和特异性分别为66.7%和98.2%。阳性似然比为37.3,阴性似然比为0.34,诊断比值比为110。结论:与单纯RUT相比,RUT联合组织学的HP检出率提高了33%。RUT是诊断HP感染的高度特异性测试。鉴于其适度的敏感性,组织学在HP感染的诊断中起着重要的作用,特别是在服用PPIs的患者中。我们建议在RUT阴性时进行组织学检查,以提高HP的检出率。关键词:回顾性,幽门螺杆菌,快速脲酶试验,组织学,RUT,吉氏染色
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Combined Rapid Urease Test and Histology For The Diagnosis of Helicobacter Pylori Infection
Significance: Accurate detection of Helicobacter pylori (HP) is essential for the diagnosis of HP infection. The use of antibiotics and proton pump inhibitors (PPI) may result in false-negative rapid urease test (RUT) results. We aimed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of RUT compared with histology and assess the detection rate of combined RUT and histology for HP infection. Methodology: Retrospective data collection was performed on 192 patients who were tested for both RUT and histology at the time of upper endoscopy from 2017 to 2018. At least two gastric biopsies (1 from corpus, 1 from antrum) were taken each for RUT and histology. The endoscopy was performed by a single gastroenterologist and a single pathologist was responsible for interpreting the histology with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and Giemsa stain. The gold standard test for the diagnosis of HP infection was histology. Demographic profile, RUT and histology results were reviewed. Tests for diagnostic accuracy were computed using SPSSv23. Results: 192 patients were tested for RUT and histology. 52(27.1%) were males and 140(72.9%) were females with a mean age of 54±17 years. Epigastric pain was the most common indication (42.7%). 24(12.5%) patients tested positive for HP infection. Among these; 16(8.3%) tested positive for both RUT and histology(true-positive), while 8(4.2%) tested negative for RUT but had positive histology(false-negative). 6 out of 8(75%) patients with false negative results had PPI use. The sensitivity and specificity of RUT for the diagnosis of HP infection were 66.7 and 98.2%, respectively. While the positive and negative likelihood ratio were 37.3 and 0.34, respectively with a diagnostic odds ratio of 110. Conclusion: The HP detection rate of RUT combined with histology increased by 33% compared with RUT alone. RUT is a highly specific test for diagnosing HP infection. Given its modest sensitivity, histology plays an important role in the diagnosis of HP infection, especially in patients taking PPIs. We recommend doing histology when RUT is negative to increase the HP detection rate. Key words: retrospective, helicobacter pylori, rapid urease test, histology, RUT, giemsa stain
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信