{"title":"美国生物制剂的分类和管理:对全球生物安全提出的问题","authors":"C. Brooks","doi":"10.1515/jbbbl-2018-0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the years, there have been many different classifications of biological agents. In the 20th century, classifications often revolved around and highlighted the weaponized potential of certain pathogens and chemicals.1 Since then, the official worldview of biological agents has shifted to a defensive stance, focusing more on classifying agents for public health preparedness and bio-risk prevention.2 However, an offense focused classification system is still utilized for militaristic purposes.3 Outside of military classifications, there are two major classification systems in the United States that have evolved from the days of the U.S.’s biological weapons program. The Select Agent Program holds regulatory power and determines which biological agents are regulated and what facilities must do to possess, use, or transfer them within the bounds of the law. The other classification system, disseminated by the National Institute of Health, takes no part in regulation, and instead provides insight into which agents scientifically pose the highest risk to global biosecurity. Navigating this broad and confusing framework can be challenging, and as with many administrative regulations, there are multiple problems associated with the implementation and enforcement of these policies that pose significant risks to global biosecurity.","PeriodicalId":415930,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biosecurity, Biosafety, and Biodefense Law","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Classifying and Regulating Biological Agents in the United States: Problems Posed to Global Biosecurity\",\"authors\":\"C. Brooks\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/jbbbl-2018-0001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Over the years, there have been many different classifications of biological agents. In the 20th century, classifications often revolved around and highlighted the weaponized potential of certain pathogens and chemicals.1 Since then, the official worldview of biological agents has shifted to a defensive stance, focusing more on classifying agents for public health preparedness and bio-risk prevention.2 However, an offense focused classification system is still utilized for militaristic purposes.3 Outside of military classifications, there are two major classification systems in the United States that have evolved from the days of the U.S.’s biological weapons program. The Select Agent Program holds regulatory power and determines which biological agents are regulated and what facilities must do to possess, use, or transfer them within the bounds of the law. The other classification system, disseminated by the National Institute of Health, takes no part in regulation, and instead provides insight into which agents scientifically pose the highest risk to global biosecurity. Navigating this broad and confusing framework can be challenging, and as with many administrative regulations, there are multiple problems associated with the implementation and enforcement of these policies that pose significant risks to global biosecurity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":415930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biosecurity, Biosafety, and Biodefense Law\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biosecurity, Biosafety, and Biodefense Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/jbbbl-2018-0001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biosecurity, Biosafety, and Biodefense Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jbbbl-2018-0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
多年来,生物制剂有许多不同的分类。在20世纪,分类经常围绕并强调某些病原体和化学物质的武器化潜力从那时起,官方对生物制剂的看法转变为防御立场,更多地侧重于对制剂进行分类,以便为公共卫生做好准备和预防生物风险2然而,以进攻为重点的分类系统仍被用于军国主义目的在军事分类之外,美国有两种主要的分类系统,它们是从美国的生物武器计划发展而来的。Select Agent Program拥有监管权力,并决定哪些生物制剂受到监管,哪些设施必须在法律范围内拥有、使用或转移这些制剂。另一种分类系统由美国国立卫生研究院(National Institute of Health)发布,不参与监管,而是提供对哪些物质在科学上对全球生物安全构成最高风险的见解。在这个广泛而混乱的框架中导航可能具有挑战性,并且与许多行政法规一样,这些政策的实施和执行存在多种问题,对全球生物安全构成重大风险。
Classifying and Regulating Biological Agents in the United States: Problems Posed to Global Biosecurity
Over the years, there have been many different classifications of biological agents. In the 20th century, classifications often revolved around and highlighted the weaponized potential of certain pathogens and chemicals.1 Since then, the official worldview of biological agents has shifted to a defensive stance, focusing more on classifying agents for public health preparedness and bio-risk prevention.2 However, an offense focused classification system is still utilized for militaristic purposes.3 Outside of military classifications, there are two major classification systems in the United States that have evolved from the days of the U.S.’s biological weapons program. The Select Agent Program holds regulatory power and determines which biological agents are regulated and what facilities must do to possess, use, or transfer them within the bounds of the law. The other classification system, disseminated by the National Institute of Health, takes no part in regulation, and instead provides insight into which agents scientifically pose the highest risk to global biosecurity. Navigating this broad and confusing framework can be challenging, and as with many administrative regulations, there are multiple problems associated with the implementation and enforcement of these policies that pose significant risks to global biosecurity.