比较背景下的亚洲基础设施投资银行治理

N. Lichtenstein
{"title":"比较背景下的亚洲基础设施投资银行治理","authors":"N. Lichtenstein","doi":"10.1163/9789004408326_006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) was launched in 2016 with governance arrangements that build on the foundations of its progenitors, with adaptations and updates reflecting AIIB’s own focus and founders. AIIB follows multilateral development banks (MDBs) such as the World Bank, Asian Development Bank, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development and Inter-American Development Bank in its governance structure (Board of Governors, Board of Directors and President). AIIB includes expanded powers for the Board of Governors to add flexibility in areas such as new types of financing and assistance to non-members. AIIB’s Board of Directors serve on a part-time nonresident basis, with detailed powers for policy, oversight and delegation. AIIB’s President is limited to two terms. AIIB’s voting structure is tied to shareholding but less so than in many other MDBs, as basic votes for all members and Founding Member Votes for founders reduce the impact of shareholding to less than 90 percent of total voting power. The underlying comparisons with other MDBs are spelled out in detail in this chapter, summarizing AIIB’s heritage and innovation in governance. *Ms. Lichtenstein is an Adjunct Professor, Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies, Washington, DC. She was formerly the Inaugural General Counsel for the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, and Assistant General Counsel at the World Bank. This article draws in part upon her book, see Natalie Lichtenstein, A Comparative Guide to the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (OUP 2018). Email: lichtenstein@jhu.edu. Governance of AIIB in Comparative Context 51 Governance in public international financial institutions began at least as far back as the July 1944 discussions at Bretton Woods, New Hampshire on the formation of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD) and the International Monetary Fund (IMF). Seventy years later, discussions were launched to create the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB), currently the newest multilateral development bank (MDB) to follow in IBRD’s pioneering footsteps. In the intervening decades, a score of other MDBs has been established, each one adapting the MDB model and its governance characteristics to different goals in a different context, all with the objective of pooling financial contributions and commitments of countries into a new development finance institution. This article traces the influence of MDB governance structures on the governance arrangements for AIIB, comparing relevant legal frameworks. After a brief introduction to AIIB (Section 1) and MDB Origins (Section 2), Section 3 describes AIIB’s governing bodies (Board of Governors, Board of Directors, President) and Section 4 describes AIIB’s decision-making rules (voting and majorities). Section 5 offers concluding observations.","PeriodicalId":237133,"journal":{"name":"Good Governance and Modern International Financial Institutions","volume":"97 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Governance of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank in Comparative Context\",\"authors\":\"N. Lichtenstein\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/9789004408326_006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) was launched in 2016 with governance arrangements that build on the foundations of its progenitors, with adaptations and updates reflecting AIIB’s own focus and founders. AIIB follows multilateral development banks (MDBs) such as the World Bank, Asian Development Bank, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development and Inter-American Development Bank in its governance structure (Board of Governors, Board of Directors and President). AIIB includes expanded powers for the Board of Governors to add flexibility in areas such as new types of financing and assistance to non-members. AIIB’s Board of Directors serve on a part-time nonresident basis, with detailed powers for policy, oversight and delegation. AIIB’s President is limited to two terms. AIIB’s voting structure is tied to shareholding but less so than in many other MDBs, as basic votes for all members and Founding Member Votes for founders reduce the impact of shareholding to less than 90 percent of total voting power. The underlying comparisons with other MDBs are spelled out in detail in this chapter, summarizing AIIB’s heritage and innovation in governance. *Ms. Lichtenstein is an Adjunct Professor, Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies, Washington, DC. She was formerly the Inaugural General Counsel for the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, and Assistant General Counsel at the World Bank. This article draws in part upon her book, see Natalie Lichtenstein, A Comparative Guide to the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (OUP 2018). Email: lichtenstein@jhu.edu. Governance of AIIB in Comparative Context 51 Governance in public international financial institutions began at least as far back as the July 1944 discussions at Bretton Woods, New Hampshire on the formation of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD) and the International Monetary Fund (IMF). Seventy years later, discussions were launched to create the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB), currently the newest multilateral development bank (MDB) to follow in IBRD’s pioneering footsteps. In the intervening decades, a score of other MDBs has been established, each one adapting the MDB model and its governance characteristics to different goals in a different context, all with the objective of pooling financial contributions and commitments of countries into a new development finance institution. This article traces the influence of MDB governance structures on the governance arrangements for AIIB, comparing relevant legal frameworks. After a brief introduction to AIIB (Section 1) and MDB Origins (Section 2), Section 3 describes AIIB’s governing bodies (Board of Governors, Board of Directors, President) and Section 4 describes AIIB’s decision-making rules (voting and majorities). Section 5 offers concluding observations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":237133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Good Governance and Modern International Financial Institutions\",\"volume\":\"97 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Good Governance and Modern International Financial Institutions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004408326_006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Good Governance and Modern International Financial Institutions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004408326_006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

亚洲基础设施投资银行(亚投行)于2016年启动,其治理安排建立在其前身的基础上,并进行了调整和更新,以反映亚投行自身的重点和创始人。亚投行的治理结构(理事会、董事会和行长)效仿了世界银行、亚洲开发银行、欧洲复兴开发银行和美洲开发银行等多边开发银行。亚投行包括扩大理事会的权力,以增加在诸如新型融资和向非成员国提供援助等领域的灵活性。亚投行董事会为兼职非常驻董事,拥有制定政策、监督和授权的具体权力。亚投行行长任期限制为两届。亚投行的投票结构与股权挂钩,但与许多其他多边开发银行相比,这种挂钩程度较低,因为所有成员的基本投票权和创始成员对创始人的投票权将股权的影响降至总投票权的90%以下。本章详细阐述了与其他多边开发银行的潜在比较,总结了亚投行在治理方面的传统和创新。*女士。利希滕斯坦是华盛顿特区约翰霍普金斯大学高级国际研究学院的兼职教授。她曾担任亚洲基础设施投资银行首任总法律顾问和世界银行助理总法律顾问。本文部分借鉴了她的著作,参见娜塔莉·利希滕斯坦的《亚洲基础设施投资银行比较指南》(OUP 2018)。电子邮件:lichtenstein@jhu.edu。51国际公共金融机构的治理至少可以追溯到1944年7月在新罕布什尔州布雷顿森林举行的关于成立国际复兴开发银行(IBRD)和国际货币基金组织(IMF)的讨论。70年后,各方开始讨论创建亚洲基础设施投资银行(亚投行),这是继国际复兴开发银行之后最新成立的多边开发银行。在此期间的几十年里,成立了许多其他多边开发银行,每个银行都根据不同背景下的不同目标调整了多边开发银行模式及其治理特征,所有这些都是为了将各国的资金捐助和承诺汇集到一个新的发展金融机构中。本文追溯了多边开发银行治理结构对亚投行治理安排的影响,比较了相关法律框架。在简要介绍了亚投行(第1节)和多边开发银行的起源(第2节)之后,第3节介绍了亚投行的理事机构(理事会、董事会、行长),第4节介绍了亚投行的决策规则(投票和多数决定)。第5节提供结论性意见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Governance of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank in Comparative Context
The Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) was launched in 2016 with governance arrangements that build on the foundations of its progenitors, with adaptations and updates reflecting AIIB’s own focus and founders. AIIB follows multilateral development banks (MDBs) such as the World Bank, Asian Development Bank, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development and Inter-American Development Bank in its governance structure (Board of Governors, Board of Directors and President). AIIB includes expanded powers for the Board of Governors to add flexibility in areas such as new types of financing and assistance to non-members. AIIB’s Board of Directors serve on a part-time nonresident basis, with detailed powers for policy, oversight and delegation. AIIB’s President is limited to two terms. AIIB’s voting structure is tied to shareholding but less so than in many other MDBs, as basic votes for all members and Founding Member Votes for founders reduce the impact of shareholding to less than 90 percent of total voting power. The underlying comparisons with other MDBs are spelled out in detail in this chapter, summarizing AIIB’s heritage and innovation in governance. *Ms. Lichtenstein is an Adjunct Professor, Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies, Washington, DC. She was formerly the Inaugural General Counsel for the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, and Assistant General Counsel at the World Bank. This article draws in part upon her book, see Natalie Lichtenstein, A Comparative Guide to the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (OUP 2018). Email: lichtenstein@jhu.edu. Governance of AIIB in Comparative Context 51 Governance in public international financial institutions began at least as far back as the July 1944 discussions at Bretton Woods, New Hampshire on the formation of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD) and the International Monetary Fund (IMF). Seventy years later, discussions were launched to create the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB), currently the newest multilateral development bank (MDB) to follow in IBRD’s pioneering footsteps. In the intervening decades, a score of other MDBs has been established, each one adapting the MDB model and its governance characteristics to different goals in a different context, all with the objective of pooling financial contributions and commitments of countries into a new development finance institution. This article traces the influence of MDB governance structures on the governance arrangements for AIIB, comparing relevant legal frameworks. After a brief introduction to AIIB (Section 1) and MDB Origins (Section 2), Section 3 describes AIIB’s governing bodies (Board of Governors, Board of Directors, President) and Section 4 describes AIIB’s decision-making rules (voting and majorities). Section 5 offers concluding observations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信