语境化用户嵌入能提高讽刺和仇恨言论的检测吗?

Kim Breitwieser
{"title":"语境化用户嵌入能提高讽刺和仇恨言论的检测吗?","authors":"Kim Breitwieser","doi":"10.18653/v1/2022.nlpcss-1.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While implicit embeddings so far have been mostly concerned with creating an overall representation of the user, we evaluate a different approach. By only considering content directed at a specific topic, we create sub-user embeddings, and measure their usefulness on the tasks of sarcasm and hate speech detection. In doing so, we show that task-related topics can have a noticeable effect on model performance, especially when dealing with intended expressions like sarcasm, but less so for hate speech, which is usually labelled as such on the receiving end.","PeriodicalId":438120,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on Natural Language Processing and Computational Social Science (NLP+CSS)","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can Contextualizing User Embeddings Improve Sarcasm and Hate Speech Detection?\",\"authors\":\"Kim Breitwieser\",\"doi\":\"10.18653/v1/2022.nlpcss-1.14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While implicit embeddings so far have been mostly concerned with creating an overall representation of the user, we evaluate a different approach. By only considering content directed at a specific topic, we create sub-user embeddings, and measure their usefulness on the tasks of sarcasm and hate speech detection. In doing so, we show that task-related topics can have a noticeable effect on model performance, especially when dealing with intended expressions like sarcasm, but less so for hate speech, which is usually labelled as such on the receiving end.\",\"PeriodicalId\":438120,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on Natural Language Processing and Computational Social Science (NLP+CSS)\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on Natural Language Processing and Computational Social Science (NLP+CSS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.nlpcss-1.14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on Natural Language Processing and Computational Social Science (NLP+CSS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.nlpcss-1.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

虽然隐式嵌入到目前为止主要关注的是创建用户的整体表示,但我们评估了一种不同的方法。通过只考虑针对特定主题的内容,我们创建子用户嵌入,并衡量它们在讽刺和仇恨言论检测任务中的有用性。在这样做的过程中,我们表明,与任务相关的主题可以对模型性能产生明显的影响,特别是在处理讽刺等预期表达时,但对仇恨言论的影响较小,因为仇恨言论通常在接收端被标记为这样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can Contextualizing User Embeddings Improve Sarcasm and Hate Speech Detection?
While implicit embeddings so far have been mostly concerned with creating an overall representation of the user, we evaluate a different approach. By only considering content directed at a specific topic, we create sub-user embeddings, and measure their usefulness on the tasks of sarcasm and hate speech detection. In doing so, we show that task-related topics can have a noticeable effect on model performance, especially when dealing with intended expressions like sarcasm, but less so for hate speech, which is usually labelled as such on the receiving end.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信