单层粘膜外肠吻合术与双层粘膜外肠吻合术的前瞻性比较研究

S. Singh, D. Prakash, D. Baliyan, Virendra Kumar, V. Saxena, Prachi
{"title":"单层粘膜外肠吻合术与双层粘膜外肠吻合术的前瞻性比较研究","authors":"S. Singh, D. Prakash, D. Baliyan, Virendra Kumar, V. Saxena, Prachi","doi":"10.5958/2321-1024.2019.00032.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background \nIntestinal perforation peritonitis is a common surgical emergency in the Indian subcontinent and in tropical countries. Formation of an intestinal stoma is frequently a component of surgical intervention for diseases of the small bowel. The technique for stoma reversal has remained controversial in the use of single layer or two layers of anastomosis. \nMethod \n30 patients for stoma closure were taken for study. These patients divided in two groups A and B, 20 and 10 each. These patients were taken up for ileostomy closure in single layer group A n-20 & double layer group B n-10. \nResults \n30 Patients of ileostomy were studied, divided in 2 groups, both groups were found to be comparatively equal in outcome with no any significant difference in complications. \nConclusion \nDouble-layer anastomosis for ileostomy closure offers no definite advantage over single layer anastomosis in terms of postoperative leak and other complications. Single layer ileostomy closure technique is safe, easy to perform and simply to taught. Considering duration of the closure procedure and cost benefits, single-layer intestinal anastomosis may prove the choice of procedure for most of the surgeons","PeriodicalId":113416,"journal":{"name":"International journal of contemporary surgery","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Prospective Comparative Study of Intestinal Anastomosis, Single Layer Extramucosal Versus Double Layer\",\"authors\":\"S. Singh, D. Prakash, D. Baliyan, Virendra Kumar, V. Saxena, Prachi\",\"doi\":\"10.5958/2321-1024.2019.00032.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background \\nIntestinal perforation peritonitis is a common surgical emergency in the Indian subcontinent and in tropical countries. Formation of an intestinal stoma is frequently a component of surgical intervention for diseases of the small bowel. The technique for stoma reversal has remained controversial in the use of single layer or two layers of anastomosis. \\nMethod \\n30 patients for stoma closure were taken for study. These patients divided in two groups A and B, 20 and 10 each. These patients were taken up for ileostomy closure in single layer group A n-20 & double layer group B n-10. \\nResults \\n30 Patients of ileostomy were studied, divided in 2 groups, both groups were found to be comparatively equal in outcome with no any significant difference in complications. \\nConclusion \\nDouble-layer anastomosis for ileostomy closure offers no definite advantage over single layer anastomosis in terms of postoperative leak and other complications. Single layer ileostomy closure technique is safe, easy to perform and simply to taught. Considering duration of the closure procedure and cost benefits, single-layer intestinal anastomosis may prove the choice of procedure for most of the surgeons\",\"PeriodicalId\":113416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of contemporary surgery\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of contemporary surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5958/2321-1024.2019.00032.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of contemporary surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5958/2321-1024.2019.00032.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景肠穿孔性腹膜炎是印度次大陆和热带国家常见的外科急症。肠造口的形成通常是小肠疾病手术干预的一个组成部分。造口反转技术是单层吻合还是双层吻合一直存在争议。方法选取30例造口术患者进行研究。患者分为A组和B组,各20例和10例。采用单层A n-20组和双层B n-10组进行回肠造口闭合。结果将30例回肠造口术患者分为两组,两组疗效相当,并发症无明显差异。结论双层吻合术在术后瘘及其他并发症方面与单层吻合术相比并无明显优势。单层回肠造口术安全、易操作、简单易学。考虑到闭合过程的持续时间和成本效益,单层肠吻合术可能是大多数外科医生的选择
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Prospective Comparative Study of Intestinal Anastomosis, Single Layer Extramucosal Versus Double Layer
Background Intestinal perforation peritonitis is a common surgical emergency in the Indian subcontinent and in tropical countries. Formation of an intestinal stoma is frequently a component of surgical intervention for diseases of the small bowel. The technique for stoma reversal has remained controversial in the use of single layer or two layers of anastomosis. Method 30 patients for stoma closure were taken for study. These patients divided in two groups A and B, 20 and 10 each. These patients were taken up for ileostomy closure in single layer group A n-20 & double layer group B n-10. Results 30 Patients of ileostomy were studied, divided in 2 groups, both groups were found to be comparatively equal in outcome with no any significant difference in complications. Conclusion Double-layer anastomosis for ileostomy closure offers no definite advantage over single layer anastomosis in terms of postoperative leak and other complications. Single layer ileostomy closure technique is safe, easy to perform and simply to taught. Considering duration of the closure procedure and cost benefits, single-layer intestinal anastomosis may prove the choice of procedure for most of the surgeons
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信