M. Komarnicki, M. Przewozniczek, H. Kwasnicka, K. Walkowiak
{"title":"增量递归排序分组——一种可加和不可加可分问题的分解策略","authors":"M. Komarnicki, M. Przewozniczek, H. Kwasnicka, K. Walkowiak","doi":"10.1145/3583133.3595846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many real-world optimization problems may be classified as Large-Scale Global Optimization (LSGO) problems. When these high-dimensional problems are continuous, it was shown effective to embed a decomposition strategy into a Cooperative Co-Evolution (CC) framework. The effectiveness of the method that decomposes a problem into subproblems and optimizes them separately may depend on the decomposition accuracy and cost. Recent decomposition strategy advances focus mainly on Differential Grouping (DG). However, when a considered problem is nonadditively separable, DG-based strategies may report some variables as interacting, although the interaction between them does not exist. Monotonicity checking strategies do not suffer from this disadvantage. However, they suffer from another decomposition inaccuracy - monotonicity checking strategies may miss discovering many existing interactions. Therefore, Incremental Recursive Ranking Grouping (IRRG) is a new proposition that accurately decomposes both additively and nonadditively separable problems. The decomposition cost of IRRG is higher when compared with Recursive DG 3 (RDG3). Since the higher cost was a negligible part of the overall computational budget, optimization results of the considered CC frameworks were affected mainly by the decomposition accuracy.","PeriodicalId":422029,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Companion Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incremental Recursive Ranking Grouping -- A Decomposition Strategy for Additively and Nonadditively Separable Problems\",\"authors\":\"M. Komarnicki, M. Przewozniczek, H. Kwasnicka, K. Walkowiak\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3583133.3595846\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many real-world optimization problems may be classified as Large-Scale Global Optimization (LSGO) problems. When these high-dimensional problems are continuous, it was shown effective to embed a decomposition strategy into a Cooperative Co-Evolution (CC) framework. The effectiveness of the method that decomposes a problem into subproblems and optimizes them separately may depend on the decomposition accuracy and cost. Recent decomposition strategy advances focus mainly on Differential Grouping (DG). However, when a considered problem is nonadditively separable, DG-based strategies may report some variables as interacting, although the interaction between them does not exist. Monotonicity checking strategies do not suffer from this disadvantage. However, they suffer from another decomposition inaccuracy - monotonicity checking strategies may miss discovering many existing interactions. Therefore, Incremental Recursive Ranking Grouping (IRRG) is a new proposition that accurately decomposes both additively and nonadditively separable problems. The decomposition cost of IRRG is higher when compared with Recursive DG 3 (RDG3). Since the higher cost was a negligible part of the overall computational budget, optimization results of the considered CC frameworks were affected mainly by the decomposition accuracy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":422029,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Companion Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Companion Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3583133.3595846\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Companion Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3583133.3595846","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Incremental Recursive Ranking Grouping -- A Decomposition Strategy for Additively and Nonadditively Separable Problems
Many real-world optimization problems may be classified as Large-Scale Global Optimization (LSGO) problems. When these high-dimensional problems are continuous, it was shown effective to embed a decomposition strategy into a Cooperative Co-Evolution (CC) framework. The effectiveness of the method that decomposes a problem into subproblems and optimizes them separately may depend on the decomposition accuracy and cost. Recent decomposition strategy advances focus mainly on Differential Grouping (DG). However, when a considered problem is nonadditively separable, DG-based strategies may report some variables as interacting, although the interaction between them does not exist. Monotonicity checking strategies do not suffer from this disadvantage. However, they suffer from another decomposition inaccuracy - monotonicity checking strategies may miss discovering many existing interactions. Therefore, Incremental Recursive Ranking Grouping (IRRG) is a new proposition that accurately decomposes both additively and nonadditively separable problems. The decomposition cost of IRRG is higher when compared with Recursive DG 3 (RDG3). Since the higher cost was a negligible part of the overall computational budget, optimization results of the considered CC frameworks were affected mainly by the decomposition accuracy.