回到基础:风险基本原理应用于尾矿储存设施的岩土工程

J. Coffey, N. Šušić
{"title":"回到基础:风险基本原理应用于尾矿储存设施的岩土工程","authors":"J. Coffey, N. Šušić","doi":"10.36487/ACG_REP/1905_25_COFFEY","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Inherent uncertainty associated with the selection of input parameters to various geotechnical analyses often results in the likelihood of failure being a dominant topic in the discussion of risk associated with geotechnical assets. As a result, embankment failure is the default risk scenario driving ongoing management of tailings storage facilities (TSFs). This commonly applied approach is inefficient as it drives resource intensive TSF management and limits scope for a risk-based approach. However, many TSFs operate with several layers of controls in place. Therefore, assessment of risk with consideration of these controls would promote greater efficiency in TSF management. \nA fit for purpose approach will be discussed that demonstrates how risk can be utilised as the foundation for the development of a management framework for a single or portfolio of TSFs. This approach focuses on the identification and monitoring of controls, based on the understanding that hazards impact when the controls put in place to manage them fail. It is necessary to build such an approach with the full application of risk principles, which will be introduced by a specialist in corporate risk. Topics covered include a brief history of risk, importance of control effectiveness in scenario selection and risk evaluation and communicating value at risk to drive resource allocation. It is hoped that this discussion and presentation of simple examples allows risk concepts to be better applied to the design and management of geotechnical structures.","PeriodicalId":337751,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the First International Conference on Mining Geomechanical Risk","volume":"74 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Getting back to basics: risk fundamentals applied to the geotechnical engineering of tailings storage facilities\",\"authors\":\"J. Coffey, N. Šušić\",\"doi\":\"10.36487/ACG_REP/1905_25_COFFEY\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Inherent uncertainty associated with the selection of input parameters to various geotechnical analyses often results in the likelihood of failure being a dominant topic in the discussion of risk associated with geotechnical assets. As a result, embankment failure is the default risk scenario driving ongoing management of tailings storage facilities (TSFs). This commonly applied approach is inefficient as it drives resource intensive TSF management and limits scope for a risk-based approach. However, many TSFs operate with several layers of controls in place. Therefore, assessment of risk with consideration of these controls would promote greater efficiency in TSF management. \\nA fit for purpose approach will be discussed that demonstrates how risk can be utilised as the foundation for the development of a management framework for a single or portfolio of TSFs. This approach focuses on the identification and monitoring of controls, based on the understanding that hazards impact when the controls put in place to manage them fail. It is necessary to build such an approach with the full application of risk principles, which will be introduced by a specialist in corporate risk. Topics covered include a brief history of risk, importance of control effectiveness in scenario selection and risk evaluation and communicating value at risk to drive resource allocation. It is hoped that this discussion and presentation of simple examples allows risk concepts to be better applied to the design and management of geotechnical structures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":337751,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the First International Conference on Mining Geomechanical Risk\",\"volume\":\"74 5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the First International Conference on Mining Geomechanical Risk\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_REP/1905_25_COFFEY\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the First International Conference on Mining Geomechanical Risk","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_REP/1905_25_COFFEY","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与各种岩土分析输入参数选择相关的固有不确定性往往导致破坏的可能性成为岩土资产相关风险讨论的主要话题。因此,路基破坏是驱动尾矿储存设施(TSFs)持续管理的默认风险情景。这种通常应用的方法效率低下,因为它驱动资源密集型的TSF管理,并限制了基于风险的方法的范围。然而,许多tsf在适当的情况下使用多层控件进行操作。因此,考虑到这些控制措施的风险评估将有助于提高总基金管理的效率。本文将讨论一种符合目的的方法,该方法将展示如何利用风险作为开发单个或组合信托基金管理框架的基础。这种方法的重点是识别和监测控制措施,基于这样一种认识,即当管理危害的控制措施失效时,危害就会产生影响。有必要在充分应用风险原则的情况下建立这样一种方法,风险原则将由公司风险专家介绍。所涵盖的主题包括风险简史,在场景选择和风险评估中控制有效性的重要性,以及在风险中沟通价值以驱动资源分配。希望这一讨论和简单例子的提出能使风险概念更好地应用于岩土结构的设计和管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Getting back to basics: risk fundamentals applied to the geotechnical engineering of tailings storage facilities
Inherent uncertainty associated with the selection of input parameters to various geotechnical analyses often results in the likelihood of failure being a dominant topic in the discussion of risk associated with geotechnical assets. As a result, embankment failure is the default risk scenario driving ongoing management of tailings storage facilities (TSFs). This commonly applied approach is inefficient as it drives resource intensive TSF management and limits scope for a risk-based approach. However, many TSFs operate with several layers of controls in place. Therefore, assessment of risk with consideration of these controls would promote greater efficiency in TSF management. A fit for purpose approach will be discussed that demonstrates how risk can be utilised as the foundation for the development of a management framework for a single or portfolio of TSFs. This approach focuses on the identification and monitoring of controls, based on the understanding that hazards impact when the controls put in place to manage them fail. It is necessary to build such an approach with the full application of risk principles, which will be introduced by a specialist in corporate risk. Topics covered include a brief history of risk, importance of control effectiveness in scenario selection and risk evaluation and communicating value at risk to drive resource allocation. It is hoped that this discussion and presentation of simple examples allows risk concepts to be better applied to the design and management of geotechnical structures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信