小接触到完全接触的统计弹性和弹塑性粗糙表面接触模型的建立与验证

S. Saha, Yang Xu, Kyle Schulze, R. Jackson
{"title":"小接触到完全接触的统计弹性和弹塑性粗糙表面接触模型的建立与验证","authors":"S. Saha, Yang Xu, Kyle Schulze, R. Jackson","doi":"10.1109/HLM51431.2021.9671135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Contact mechanics models are widely used to analyze electrical contact behavior. Greenwood and Williamson (GW model) first developed a rough surface contact model to solve the problem of electrical contact. The original GW model used the Hertz single asperity model and a Gaussian distribution of the surface roughness. However, in many of the electrical contact cases, contact area surpasses the Hertz small contact region. For medium to complete contact cases, asperity interactions become very important and the Hertz model cannot predict this behavior. Besides asperity interaction, the probability distribution function (PDF) of the asperities of the rough surface is very important as not all the surfaces are Gaussian in nature. This work has shown the effect of asperity models to predict the asperity interaction behavior. Then the asperity models are applied with different PDF of the asperities of the rough surface in the framework of the statistical model. For the elastic case, the newly proposed rough surface models are compared with a Boundary Element Method (BEM) simulation result and the Persson model. For the elastic-plastic case, electrical contact resistance has been measured between two rough surfaces using the four-wire resistance method and then the newly proposed rough surface models are compared with the experimental results. Comparisons suggest that sinusoidal asperity model and the proper choice of the PDF of the asperity of the rough surface can effectively model the contact resistance behavior.","PeriodicalId":338653,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE 66th Holm Conference on Electrical Contacts (HLM)","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Validation of the Statistical Elastic and Elastic-plastic Rough Surface Contact Model for Small Contact to Complete Contact\",\"authors\":\"S. Saha, Yang Xu, Kyle Schulze, R. Jackson\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/HLM51431.2021.9671135\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Contact mechanics models are widely used to analyze electrical contact behavior. Greenwood and Williamson (GW model) first developed a rough surface contact model to solve the problem of electrical contact. The original GW model used the Hertz single asperity model and a Gaussian distribution of the surface roughness. However, in many of the electrical contact cases, contact area surpasses the Hertz small contact region. For medium to complete contact cases, asperity interactions become very important and the Hertz model cannot predict this behavior. Besides asperity interaction, the probability distribution function (PDF) of the asperities of the rough surface is very important as not all the surfaces are Gaussian in nature. This work has shown the effect of asperity models to predict the asperity interaction behavior. Then the asperity models are applied with different PDF of the asperities of the rough surface in the framework of the statistical model. For the elastic case, the newly proposed rough surface models are compared with a Boundary Element Method (BEM) simulation result and the Persson model. For the elastic-plastic case, electrical contact resistance has been measured between two rough surfaces using the four-wire resistance method and then the newly proposed rough surface models are compared with the experimental results. Comparisons suggest that sinusoidal asperity model and the proper choice of the PDF of the asperity of the rough surface can effectively model the contact resistance behavior.\",\"PeriodicalId\":338653,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 IEEE 66th Holm Conference on Electrical Contacts (HLM)\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 IEEE 66th Holm Conference on Electrical Contacts (HLM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/HLM51431.2021.9671135\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE 66th Holm Conference on Electrical Contacts (HLM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HLM51431.2021.9671135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

接触力学模型被广泛用于分析电接触行为。Greenwood和Williamson (GW模型)首先提出了粗糙表面接触模型来解决电接触问题。原始的GW模型采用赫兹单粗糙度模型,表面粗糙度采用高斯分布。然而,在许多电接触情况下,接触面积超过赫兹小接触区域。对于介质到完全接触情况,粗糙相互作用变得非常重要,赫兹模型无法预测这种行为。由于并非所有表面都是高斯性质的,因此除了粗糙度相互作用外,粗糙表面粗糙度的概率分布函数(PDF)也很重要。本研究显示了粗糙模型对粗糙相互作用行为的预测效果。然后在统计模型的框架内对粗糙表面的粗糙度进行不同PDF的应用。对于弹性情况,将新提出的粗糙表面模型与边界元法(BEM)仿真结果和Persson模型进行了比较。对于弹塑性情况,采用四线电阻法测量了两个粗糙表面之间的接触电阻,并将新提出的粗糙表面模型与实验结果进行了比较。对比表明,采用正弦粗糙度模型和适当选择粗糙表面粗糙度的PDF值可以有效地模拟接触电阻行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and Validation of the Statistical Elastic and Elastic-plastic Rough Surface Contact Model for Small Contact to Complete Contact
Contact mechanics models are widely used to analyze electrical contact behavior. Greenwood and Williamson (GW model) first developed a rough surface contact model to solve the problem of electrical contact. The original GW model used the Hertz single asperity model and a Gaussian distribution of the surface roughness. However, in many of the electrical contact cases, contact area surpasses the Hertz small contact region. For medium to complete contact cases, asperity interactions become very important and the Hertz model cannot predict this behavior. Besides asperity interaction, the probability distribution function (PDF) of the asperities of the rough surface is very important as not all the surfaces are Gaussian in nature. This work has shown the effect of asperity models to predict the asperity interaction behavior. Then the asperity models are applied with different PDF of the asperities of the rough surface in the framework of the statistical model. For the elastic case, the newly proposed rough surface models are compared with a Boundary Element Method (BEM) simulation result and the Persson model. For the elastic-plastic case, electrical contact resistance has been measured between two rough surfaces using the four-wire resistance method and then the newly proposed rough surface models are compared with the experimental results. Comparisons suggest that sinusoidal asperity model and the proper choice of the PDF of the asperity of the rough surface can effectively model the contact resistance behavior.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信