分析推荐的云安全控制以验证OpenPMF“策略即服务”

Ulrich Lang , Rudolf Schreiner
{"title":"分析推荐的云安全控制以验证OpenPMF“策略即服务”","authors":"Ulrich Lang ,&nbsp;Rudolf Schreiner","doi":"10.1016/j.istr.2011.08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper describes some of the findings of a cloud research project the authors carried out in Q2/2011. As part of the project, the authors first identified security concerns related to cloud computing, and gaps in cloud-related standards/regulations. The authors then identified several hard-to-implement, but highly cloud-relevant, security requirements in numerous cloud (and non-cloud) regulations and guidance documents, especially related to “least privilege”, “information flow control”, and “incident monitoring/auditing/analysis”. Further study revealed that there are significant cloud technology gaps in cloud (and non-cloud) platforms, which make it difficult to effectively implement those security policy requirements. The project concluded that model-driven security policy automation offered as a cloud service and tied into the protected cloud platform is ideally suited to achieve correct, consistent, low-effort/cost policy implementation for cloud applications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100669,"journal":{"name":"Information Security Technical Report","volume":"16 3","pages":"Pages 131-141"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.istr.2011.08.001","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of recommended cloud security controls to validate OpenPMF “policy as a service”\",\"authors\":\"Ulrich Lang ,&nbsp;Rudolf Schreiner\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.istr.2011.08.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper describes some of the findings of a cloud research project the authors carried out in Q2/2011. As part of the project, the authors first identified security concerns related to cloud computing, and gaps in cloud-related standards/regulations. The authors then identified several hard-to-implement, but highly cloud-relevant, security requirements in numerous cloud (and non-cloud) regulations and guidance documents, especially related to “least privilege”, “information flow control”, and “incident monitoring/auditing/analysis”. Further study revealed that there are significant cloud technology gaps in cloud (and non-cloud) platforms, which make it difficult to effectively implement those security policy requirements. The project concluded that model-driven security policy automation offered as a cloud service and tied into the protected cloud platform is ideally suited to achieve correct, consistent, low-effort/cost policy implementation for cloud applications.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100669,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information Security Technical Report\",\"volume\":\"16 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 131-141\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.istr.2011.08.001\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information Security Technical Report\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136341271100046X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Security Technical Report","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136341271100046X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

本文描述了作者在2011年第二季度进行的云研究项目的一些发现。作为该项目的一部分,作者首先确定了与云计算相关的安全问题,以及与云相关的标准/法规中的差距。然后,作者在众多云(和非云)法规和指导文件中确定了几个难以实现但与云高度相关的安全需求,特别是与“最小权限”、“信息流控制”和“事件监控/审计/分析”相关的安全需求。进一步的研究表明,云(和非云)平台存在显著的云技术差距,这使得难以有效实施这些安全策略要求。该项目得出结论,模型驱动的安全策略自动化作为云服务提供,并绑定到受保护的云平台中,非常适合为云应用程序实现正确、一致、低成本的策略实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of recommended cloud security controls to validate OpenPMF “policy as a service”

This paper describes some of the findings of a cloud research project the authors carried out in Q2/2011. As part of the project, the authors first identified security concerns related to cloud computing, and gaps in cloud-related standards/regulations. The authors then identified several hard-to-implement, but highly cloud-relevant, security requirements in numerous cloud (and non-cloud) regulations and guidance documents, especially related to “least privilege”, “information flow control”, and “incident monitoring/auditing/analysis”. Further study revealed that there are significant cloud technology gaps in cloud (and non-cloud) platforms, which make it difficult to effectively implement those security policy requirements. The project concluded that model-driven security policy automation offered as a cloud service and tied into the protected cloud platform is ideally suited to achieve correct, consistent, low-effort/cost policy implementation for cloud applications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信