{"title":"灭绝后的繁殖:拉丁美洲人类景观小说中的解毒关怀","authors":"Allison Mackey","doi":"10.36225/tekopora.v3i1.125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Anxieties around failed parenting are linked to humanity’s failed stewardship of the planet in many recent Anthropocene narratives, yet the figure of the biological human child, as *the* signifier of futurity draws attention to the difficulty of imagining the future in non-heteronormative, non-Western, and non-anthropocentric terms. Reproduction is nothing if not a replication of self, of forms of life that are like us. In order to recuperate an alternative model of care from its anthropocentric lineage, I examine how Anacristina Rossi’s feminist sci-fi story “Abel” (2013) and Samantha Schweblin’s gothic horror novella Distancia de Rescate (2014) perform radical critiques of the idea of reproductive bodies, while at the same time opening out to signal non-binary possibilities of life, offering species-level critique while at the same time remaining rooted in local geographies. These stories embrace the negative implications of Anthropocene thinking, challenging, reflecting, and perpetuating anxieties around sexual difference and the possibility of human extinction, without relying on essentialised mandates about femininity, childbearing and care giving. They engage with what Claire Colebrook calls “figural extinction” as a way to signal the possibility of moving away from historically toxic androcentric, capitalist and anthropocentric visions of care, and toward an ethic of non/human connection.","PeriodicalId":312767,"journal":{"name":"Tekoporá Revista Latinoamericana de humanidades ambientales y estudios territoriales","volume":"39 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"La reproducción más allá de la extinción: cuidados desintoxificados en ficciones antropocénicas latinoamericanas\",\"authors\":\"Allison Mackey\",\"doi\":\"10.36225/tekopora.v3i1.125\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Anxieties around failed parenting are linked to humanity’s failed stewardship of the planet in many recent Anthropocene narratives, yet the figure of the biological human child, as *the* signifier of futurity draws attention to the difficulty of imagining the future in non-heteronormative, non-Western, and non-anthropocentric terms. Reproduction is nothing if not a replication of self, of forms of life that are like us. In order to recuperate an alternative model of care from its anthropocentric lineage, I examine how Anacristina Rossi’s feminist sci-fi story “Abel” (2013) and Samantha Schweblin’s gothic horror novella Distancia de Rescate (2014) perform radical critiques of the idea of reproductive bodies, while at the same time opening out to signal non-binary possibilities of life, offering species-level critique while at the same time remaining rooted in local geographies. These stories embrace the negative implications of Anthropocene thinking, challenging, reflecting, and perpetuating anxieties around sexual difference and the possibility of human extinction, without relying on essentialised mandates about femininity, childbearing and care giving. They engage with what Claire Colebrook calls “figural extinction” as a way to signal the possibility of moving away from historically toxic androcentric, capitalist and anthropocentric visions of care, and toward an ethic of non/human connection.\",\"PeriodicalId\":312767,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tekoporá Revista Latinoamericana de humanidades ambientales y estudios territoriales\",\"volume\":\"39 4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tekoporá Revista Latinoamericana de humanidades ambientales y estudios territoriales\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36225/tekopora.v3i1.125\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tekoporá Revista Latinoamericana de humanidades ambientales y estudios territoriales","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36225/tekopora.v3i1.125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在最近的许多人类世叙事中,对失败的养育方式的焦虑与人类对地球管理的失败有关,然而,作为未来的“象征”,人类孩子的生物形象让人们注意到,在非异性恋规范、非西方和非人类中心主义的条件下,想象未来的困难。繁殖如果不是自我的复制,就是像我们一样的生命形式的复制,那就什么也不是。为了从人类中心主义谱系中恢复另一种护理模式,我研究了安娜克里斯蒂娜·罗西(Anacristina Rossi)的女权主义科幻小说《阿贝尔》(Abel, 2013)和萨曼莎·施韦布林(Samantha Schweblin)的哥特式恐怖中篇小说《异地恋》(Distancia de Rescate, 2014)是如何对生殖身体的概念进行激进批评的,同时又揭示了生命的非二元可能性,提供了物种层面的批评,同时又立足于当地地理。这些故事包含了人类世思想的负面影响,挑战、反映和延续了对性别差异和人类灭绝可能性的焦虑,而不依赖于对女性特质、生育和照顾的本质要求。他们将克莱尔·科尔布鲁克(Claire Colebrook)所说的“形象灭绝”作为一种信号,表明有可能摆脱历史上有毒的以男性为中心、资本主义和以人类为中心的关怀愿景,并走向一种非人类联系的伦理。
La reproducción más allá de la extinción: cuidados desintoxificados en ficciones antropocénicas latinoamericanas
Anxieties around failed parenting are linked to humanity’s failed stewardship of the planet in many recent Anthropocene narratives, yet the figure of the biological human child, as *the* signifier of futurity draws attention to the difficulty of imagining the future in non-heteronormative, non-Western, and non-anthropocentric terms. Reproduction is nothing if not a replication of self, of forms of life that are like us. In order to recuperate an alternative model of care from its anthropocentric lineage, I examine how Anacristina Rossi’s feminist sci-fi story “Abel” (2013) and Samantha Schweblin’s gothic horror novella Distancia de Rescate (2014) perform radical critiques of the idea of reproductive bodies, while at the same time opening out to signal non-binary possibilities of life, offering species-level critique while at the same time remaining rooted in local geographies. These stories embrace the negative implications of Anthropocene thinking, challenging, reflecting, and perpetuating anxieties around sexual difference and the possibility of human extinction, without relying on essentialised mandates about femininity, childbearing and care giving. They engage with what Claire Colebrook calls “figural extinction” as a way to signal the possibility of moving away from historically toxic androcentric, capitalist and anthropocentric visions of care, and toward an ethic of non/human connection.