{"title":"谁在欺骗谁?","authors":"P. Peterson","doi":"10.22004/AG.ECON.229497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many opinions have been expressed by market participants in the weeks since a Chicago jury found Michael Coscia guilty of “spoofing” on November 3. This was the first criminal case on spoofing, and the first to be tried under the expanded definition of disruptive futures market trading practices in the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Customer Protection Act. Dodd-Frank defines spoofing as “bidding or offering with the intent to cancel the bid or offer before execution.” Also see in the farmdoc daily article on May 6, 2015 for a detailed illustration of how spoofing works.","PeriodicalId":329270,"journal":{"name":"farmdoc daily","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Who's Spoofing Whom?\",\"authors\":\"P. Peterson\",\"doi\":\"10.22004/AG.ECON.229497\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many opinions have been expressed by market participants in the weeks since a Chicago jury found Michael Coscia guilty of “spoofing” on November 3. This was the first criminal case on spoofing, and the first to be tried under the expanded definition of disruptive futures market trading practices in the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Customer Protection Act. Dodd-Frank defines spoofing as “bidding or offering with the intent to cancel the bid or offer before execution.” Also see in the farmdoc daily article on May 6, 2015 for a detailed illustration of how spoofing works.\",\"PeriodicalId\":329270,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"farmdoc daily\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"farmdoc daily\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22004/AG.ECON.229497\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"farmdoc daily","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22004/AG.ECON.229497","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
自11月3日芝加哥陪审团裁定迈克尔•科西亚(Michael Coscia)犯有“欺骗”罪以来,几周内市场参与者表达了多种观点。这是第一起关于欺诈的刑事案件,也是第一起根据《多德-弗兰克华尔街改革与客户保护法案》(Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Customer Protection Act)扩大的破坏性期货市场交易行为定义进行审判的案件。多德-弗兰克法案将欺骗定义为“意图在执行之前取消投标或要约的投标或要约”。也可以在2015年5月6日的farmdoc每日文章中看到关于如何欺骗工作的详细说明。
Many opinions have been expressed by market participants in the weeks since a Chicago jury found Michael Coscia guilty of “spoofing” on November 3. This was the first criminal case on spoofing, and the first to be tried under the expanded definition of disruptive futures market trading practices in the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Customer Protection Act. Dodd-Frank defines spoofing as “bidding or offering with the intent to cancel the bid or offer before execution.” Also see in the farmdoc daily article on May 6, 2015 for a detailed illustration of how spoofing works.