问题解决与批判理论的区别:来自国际关系的反思

Gabriel Jiménez-Peña
{"title":"问题解决与批判理论的区别:来自国际关系的反思","authors":"Gabriel Jiménez-Peña","doi":"10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/desafios/a.7861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper attempts to determine what points of view of certain ir authors have been associated with the category ‘critical’, and for what reasons. Second, it seeks to show that there are not just nuanced, but substantial differences between different ‘critical’ approaches, and within them. Finally, it concludes exploring plausible reasons for this classification of theories, currently useful in IR, arguing that there is a sense in which this comprehensive concept is of utility, but that it may also cause confusion and spurious generalizations.","PeriodicalId":319779,"journal":{"name":"Desafíos","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"La distinción entre problem-solving y teoría crítica: una reflexión desde las Relaciones Internacionales\",\"authors\":\"Gabriel Jiménez-Peña\",\"doi\":\"10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/desafios/a.7861\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper attempts to determine what points of view of certain ir authors have been associated with the category ‘critical’, and for what reasons. Second, it seeks to show that there are not just nuanced, but substantial differences between different ‘critical’ approaches, and within them. Finally, it concludes exploring plausible reasons for this classification of theories, currently useful in IR, arguing that there is a sense in which this comprehensive concept is of utility, but that it may also cause confusion and spurious generalizations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":319779,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Desafíos\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Desafíos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/desafios/a.7861\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Desafíos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/desafios/a.7861","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文试图确定某些作者的哪些观点与“批判”这一类别有关,以及出于什么原因。其次,它试图表明,不同的“批判”方法之间,以及它们内部,不仅存在细微差别,而且存在实质性差异。最后,本文探讨了目前在IR中有用的这种理论分类的合理原因,认为在某种意义上,这种综合概念是实用的,但它也可能导致混淆和虚假的概括。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
La distinción entre problem-solving y teoría crítica: una reflexión desde las Relaciones Internacionales
This paper attempts to determine what points of view of certain ir authors have been associated with the category ‘critical’, and for what reasons. Second, it seeks to show that there are not just nuanced, but substantial differences between different ‘critical’ approaches, and within them. Finally, it concludes exploring plausible reasons for this classification of theories, currently useful in IR, arguing that there is a sense in which this comprehensive concept is of utility, but that it may also cause confusion and spurious generalizations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信