利用加权和法进行分包商KPI绩效评价

Richard Nico Lumanauw, P. Ng, A. Saptari, I. Halim, M. Toha, Y. J. Ng
{"title":"利用加权和法进行分包商KPI绩效评价","authors":"Richard Nico Lumanauw, P. Ng, A. Saptari, I. Halim, M. Toha, Y. J. Ng","doi":"10.33093/jetap.2023.5.1.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) help measure objectives critical to business sustainability. This research takes place in a toy factory’s injection moulding department that has yet to develop indicators for subcontractor performance. Poor subcontractor performance significantly impacts the injection moulding production. In the last three months, the delivered quantity exceeded the target by 27%, delivery time consistency is only 78%, there were 1.31% rejects, and inventory accuracy and material efficiency were 81% and 93% respectively. The objective of the study is to determine the KPI and develop an evaluation procedure for the injection moulding supplier and select the best supplier. Multi-criteria decision-making, i.e., weighted sum method, was used. Five employees were involved in determining the criteria weights. The evaluation was based on each supplier’s performance. A written KPI for the company's subcontractor and performance evaluation procedures were developed. There were six subcontractors of which subcontractor H received the highest score (78.42) and subcontractor G received the lowest score (69.42). The subcontractor performance needs to be improved in the future. In the interest of the company’s sustainability, it is recommended that this subcontractor performance evaluation be institutionalised to support subcontractor performance. Successful subcontractors support the business performance.","PeriodicalId":441201,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering Technology and Applied Physics","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance Evaluation of Subcontractors Using Weighted Sum Method through KPI Measurement\",\"authors\":\"Richard Nico Lumanauw, P. Ng, A. Saptari, I. Halim, M. Toha, Y. J. Ng\",\"doi\":\"10.33093/jetap.2023.5.1.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) help measure objectives critical to business sustainability. This research takes place in a toy factory’s injection moulding department that has yet to develop indicators for subcontractor performance. Poor subcontractor performance significantly impacts the injection moulding production. In the last three months, the delivered quantity exceeded the target by 27%, delivery time consistency is only 78%, there were 1.31% rejects, and inventory accuracy and material efficiency were 81% and 93% respectively. The objective of the study is to determine the KPI and develop an evaluation procedure for the injection moulding supplier and select the best supplier. Multi-criteria decision-making, i.e., weighted sum method, was used. Five employees were involved in determining the criteria weights. The evaluation was based on each supplier’s performance. A written KPI for the company's subcontractor and performance evaluation procedures were developed. There were six subcontractors of which subcontractor H received the highest score (78.42) and subcontractor G received the lowest score (69.42). The subcontractor performance needs to be improved in the future. In the interest of the company’s sustainability, it is recommended that this subcontractor performance evaluation be institutionalised to support subcontractor performance. Successful subcontractors support the business performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":441201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Engineering Technology and Applied Physics\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Engineering Technology and Applied Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33093/jetap.2023.5.1.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Engineering Technology and Applied Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33093/jetap.2023.5.1.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关键绩效指标(kpi)有助于衡量对业务可持续性至关重要的目标。本研究发生在一家玩具厂的注塑部门,该部门尚未制定分包商绩效指标。分包商的不良表现严重影响注塑生产。近3个月,交货数量超过目标27%,交货时间一致性仅78%,不合格率1.31%,库存准确性81%,物料效率93%。研究的目的是确定关键绩效指标,制定注塑供应商的评估程序,并选择最佳供应商。采用多准则决策,即加权和法。五名员工参与了标准权重的确定。评估是基于每个供应商的表现。制定了公司分包商的书面KPI和绩效评估程序。共有6家分包商,其中H得分最高(78.42分),G得分最低(69.42分)。今后分包商的表现需要改进。为了公司的可持续发展,建议将分包商绩效评估制度化,以支持分包商的绩效。成功的分包商支持业务绩效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance Evaluation of Subcontractors Using Weighted Sum Method through KPI Measurement
Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) help measure objectives critical to business sustainability. This research takes place in a toy factory’s injection moulding department that has yet to develop indicators for subcontractor performance. Poor subcontractor performance significantly impacts the injection moulding production. In the last three months, the delivered quantity exceeded the target by 27%, delivery time consistency is only 78%, there were 1.31% rejects, and inventory accuracy and material efficiency were 81% and 93% respectively. The objective of the study is to determine the KPI and develop an evaluation procedure for the injection moulding supplier and select the best supplier. Multi-criteria decision-making, i.e., weighted sum method, was used. Five employees were involved in determining the criteria weights. The evaluation was based on each supplier’s performance. A written KPI for the company's subcontractor and performance evaluation procedures were developed. There were six subcontractors of which subcontractor H received the highest score (78.42) and subcontractor G received the lowest score (69.42). The subcontractor performance needs to be improved in the future. In the interest of the company’s sustainability, it is recommended that this subcontractor performance evaluation be institutionalised to support subcontractor performance. Successful subcontractors support the business performance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信