E. Tehraninejad, Maryam Olsadat Razavi, Azadeh Tarafdari Menshadi, M. Shariat, Saiedeh Shahsavari, F. Haghollahi, Elham Azimi Nekoo
{"title":"不良应答者卵巢富血小板血浆注射如何影响卵母细胞和抗苗勒管激素:一项临床试验","authors":"E. Tehraninejad, Maryam Olsadat Razavi, Azadeh Tarafdari Menshadi, M. Shariat, Saiedeh Shahsavari, F. Haghollahi, Elham Azimi Nekoo","doi":"10.18502/jfrh.v17i3.13539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) is proposed to have important role in cell division and proliferation, angiogenesis and health. This study evaluates the effect of a single injection of autologous PRP on ovarian response markers in women with poor ovarian response (POR). \nMaterials and methods: This non-randomized clinical trial was conducted between August 2020 and September 2021. Fifty six women with Bologna criteria for POR willingly chose to participate in one of the following groups: PRP for one cycle in the time of oocyte pickup (OPU) (intervention group, n= 34) or control group (n=22).The primary outcomes were: number and quality of oocytes in coming 2 cycles of ICSI, and Anti Mullerian Hormone (AMH) level two months after PRP injection. The secondary outcomes were the number and quality of embryos and chemical pregnancy rate after embryo transfer. \nResults: A total of 45 participants continued the study, of which 23 were in the intervention group and 22 in control group. There were no demographic differences between two groups. At a two cycle follow up, PRP group experienced a significant improvement in AMH level and there was no respective change in control group. In one year follow up the overall pregnancy rates were same in both groups (3% Vs. 0, p=.60), while there was no difference in cumulative number and quality of embryos. \nConclusion: PRP injection can improve ovarian reserve marker without adverse effects. Further evidence is required to evaluate the impact of PRP on assisted reproduction outcomes. \n ","PeriodicalId":227884,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family & Reproductive Health","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Does Platelet-rich Plasma Injection in Ovaries of Poor Responders Affect the Retrieved Oocytes, and Anti Mullerian Hormone: A Clinical Trial\",\"authors\":\"E. Tehraninejad, Maryam Olsadat Razavi, Azadeh Tarafdari Menshadi, M. Shariat, Saiedeh Shahsavari, F. Haghollahi, Elham Azimi Nekoo\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/jfrh.v17i3.13539\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) is proposed to have important role in cell division and proliferation, angiogenesis and health. This study evaluates the effect of a single injection of autologous PRP on ovarian response markers in women with poor ovarian response (POR). \\nMaterials and methods: This non-randomized clinical trial was conducted between August 2020 and September 2021. Fifty six women with Bologna criteria for POR willingly chose to participate in one of the following groups: PRP for one cycle in the time of oocyte pickup (OPU) (intervention group, n= 34) or control group (n=22).The primary outcomes were: number and quality of oocytes in coming 2 cycles of ICSI, and Anti Mullerian Hormone (AMH) level two months after PRP injection. The secondary outcomes were the number and quality of embryos and chemical pregnancy rate after embryo transfer. \\nResults: A total of 45 participants continued the study, of which 23 were in the intervention group and 22 in control group. There were no demographic differences between two groups. At a two cycle follow up, PRP group experienced a significant improvement in AMH level and there was no respective change in control group. In one year follow up the overall pregnancy rates were same in both groups (3% Vs. 0, p=.60), while there was no difference in cumulative number and quality of embryos. \\nConclusion: PRP injection can improve ovarian reserve marker without adverse effects. Further evidence is required to evaluate the impact of PRP on assisted reproduction outcomes. \\n \",\"PeriodicalId\":227884,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Family & Reproductive Health\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Family & Reproductive Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/jfrh.v17i3.13539\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family & Reproductive Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jfrh.v17i3.13539","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:富血小板血浆(PRP)在细胞分裂和增殖、血管生成和健康等方面具有重要作用。本研究评估单次注射自体PRP对卵巢反应不良(POR)女性卵巢反应标志物的影响。材料和方法:该非随机临床试验于2020年8月至2021年9月进行。56名符合博洛尼亚POR标准的妇女自愿选择参加以下其中一组:在取卵(OPU)时进行一个周期的PRP(干预组,n= 34)或对照组(n=22)。主要观察指标为:ICSI后2个周期卵母细胞数量和质量,注射PRP后2个月抗苗勒管激素(AMH)水平。次要指标为胚胎移植后胚胎数量、质量及化学妊娠率。结果:共有45名参与者继续研究,其中干预组23人,对照组22人。两组之间没有人口统计学差异。2个周期随访,PRP组AMH水平明显改善,对照组无明显变化。在1年的随访中,两组的总妊娠率相同(3% Vs. 0, p= 0.60),而胚胎的累积数量和质量没有差异。结论:PRP注射液可改善卵巢储备指标,无不良反应。需要进一步的证据来评估PRP对辅助生殖结果的影响。
How Does Platelet-rich Plasma Injection in Ovaries of Poor Responders Affect the Retrieved Oocytes, and Anti Mullerian Hormone: A Clinical Trial
Objective: Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) is proposed to have important role in cell division and proliferation, angiogenesis and health. This study evaluates the effect of a single injection of autologous PRP on ovarian response markers in women with poor ovarian response (POR).
Materials and methods: This non-randomized clinical trial was conducted between August 2020 and September 2021. Fifty six women with Bologna criteria for POR willingly chose to participate in one of the following groups: PRP for one cycle in the time of oocyte pickup (OPU) (intervention group, n= 34) or control group (n=22).The primary outcomes were: number and quality of oocytes in coming 2 cycles of ICSI, and Anti Mullerian Hormone (AMH) level two months after PRP injection. The secondary outcomes were the number and quality of embryos and chemical pregnancy rate after embryo transfer.
Results: A total of 45 participants continued the study, of which 23 were in the intervention group and 22 in control group. There were no demographic differences between two groups. At a two cycle follow up, PRP group experienced a significant improvement in AMH level and there was no respective change in control group. In one year follow up the overall pregnancy rates were same in both groups (3% Vs. 0, p=.60), while there was no difference in cumulative number and quality of embryos.
Conclusion: PRP injection can improve ovarian reserve marker without adverse effects. Further evidence is required to evaluate the impact of PRP on assisted reproduction outcomes.