科学的解释:

Bradford Skow
{"title":"科学的解释:","authors":"Bradford Skow","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv173f2gh.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The title of this chapter is misleading. “Scientific explanation” is the traditional name for a topic philosophers of science are supposed to have something to say about. But it is a bad name for that topic. For one thing, theories of scientific explanation don’t have an activity that is exclusive to scientists as their subject matter. Non-scientists do it too, all the time; they just have less specialized knowledge to use, and direct their attention to less complicated phenomena. This suggests that we drop the adjective “scientific” and call the topic “explanation.” But the word “explanation” all by itself is also a bad name for the topic. What philosophers have called theories of explanation are meant to say something about what is happening in scenarios like these:","PeriodicalId":351770,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World","volume":"91 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scientific Explanation:\",\"authors\":\"Bradford Skow\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/j.ctv173f2gh.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The title of this chapter is misleading. “Scientific explanation” is the traditional name for a topic philosophers of science are supposed to have something to say about. But it is a bad name for that topic. For one thing, theories of scientific explanation don’t have an activity that is exclusive to scientists as their subject matter. Non-scientists do it too, all the time; they just have less specialized knowledge to use, and direct their attention to less complicated phenomena. This suggests that we drop the adjective “scientific” and call the topic “explanation.” But the word “explanation” all by itself is also a bad name for the topic. What philosophers have called theories of explanation are meant to say something about what is happening in scenarios like these:\",\"PeriodicalId\":351770,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World\",\"volume\":\"91 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv173f2gh.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv173f2gh.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这一章的标题容易引起误解。“科学解释”是一个传统的名称,是科学哲学家应该对这个话题有所阐述的。但这对这个话题来说是个坏名字。首先,科学解释的理论并没有一个科学家独有的活动作为它们的主题。非科学家也一直这么做;他们只是没有那么多专业知识可用,把注意力集中在不那么复杂的现象上。这就建议我们放弃“科学”这个形容词,而称这个话题为“解释”。但是“解释”这个词本身对于这个话题来说也是一个不好的名字。哲学家们所谓的解释理论旨在说明在以下情况下发生的事情:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Scientific Explanation:
The title of this chapter is misleading. “Scientific explanation” is the traditional name for a topic philosophers of science are supposed to have something to say about. But it is a bad name for that topic. For one thing, theories of scientific explanation don’t have an activity that is exclusive to scientists as their subject matter. Non-scientists do it too, all the time; they just have less specialized knowledge to use, and direct their attention to less complicated phenomena. This suggests that we drop the adjective “scientific” and call the topic “explanation.” But the word “explanation” all by itself is also a bad name for the topic. What philosophers have called theories of explanation are meant to say something about what is happening in scenarios like these:
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信