{"title":"P121利用预先建立的盲法跑步机方案对动态氧评估进行审计","authors":"S. Mcarthur, S. Baxter","doi":"10.1136/thorax-2022-btsabstracts.256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionA blinded ambulatory oxygen assessment protocol on a treadmill was established in 2005. Patients perform 2 walking tests, up to fifteen minutes each, on a treadmill at a set speed with a 30 minute rest between tests. The patient wears nasal cannulae on both tests, through which they receive 2L/min of air or Oxygen. Patients rate their breathlessness on a BORG scale every minute and this is recorded with Oxygen saturation via ear probe and heart rate. An increase in distance (10%) or decrease in BORG scores (1 point/10%) would indicate a need for ambulatory Oxygen prescription. The British Thoracic Society (BTS) 2015 ambulatory Oxygen therapy assessment protocol also states that an increase in SpO2 to ≥90% throughout the test would show a benefit to the patient1.AimHow many patients referred for assessment would benefit from prescription of ambulatory Oxygen based on the current BTS protocol?MethodsTest results, demographic and clinical data were collated for all patients referred for ambulatory Oxygen assessment over 1 year.Results88 patients were referred for assessment with 18 excluded (n=70). 11 patients only carried out the baseline test on air without progressing to the second test on oxygen as there was no significant desaturation during exercise. Of the 59 remaining patients 34 would be recommended ambulatory oxygen therapy, 19 would not and the remaining 6 may require higher flow rates than the 4L/min O2 that is the highest rate within the protocol. Only 18 patients (18/59=31%) had a decrease in BORG (felt better) by 10% or 1 point whilst on supplemental O2. 10 patients (10/59=17%) reported higher BORG scores on Oxygen (?fatigue, ? walked further).ConclusionOf the 70 patients included in the audit 34 (48.57%) would be recommended ambulatory oxygen therapy, 30 (42.86%) would not and the remaining 6 (8.57%) may require higher flow rates than the 4L/min that is the highest rate within the protocol. This protocol has been particularly useful during the COVID pandemic and the SOP has been shared with other departments.ReferencesHardinge M, Annandale J, Bourne S, et al. British Thoracic Society guidelines for home oxygen use in adults: accredited by NICE. Thorax 2015;70:i1-i43.","PeriodicalId":224722,"journal":{"name":"‘Interview with a Vampire’ – Blood gas monitoring in clinical care","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"P121 An audit of ambulatory oxygen assessments utilising a pre-established blinded treadmill protocol\",\"authors\":\"S. Mcarthur, S. Baxter\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/thorax-2022-btsabstracts.256\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"IntroductionA blinded ambulatory oxygen assessment protocol on a treadmill was established in 2005. Patients perform 2 walking tests, up to fifteen minutes each, on a treadmill at a set speed with a 30 minute rest between tests. The patient wears nasal cannulae on both tests, through which they receive 2L/min of air or Oxygen. Patients rate their breathlessness on a BORG scale every minute and this is recorded with Oxygen saturation via ear probe and heart rate. An increase in distance (10%) or decrease in BORG scores (1 point/10%) would indicate a need for ambulatory Oxygen prescription. The British Thoracic Society (BTS) 2015 ambulatory Oxygen therapy assessment protocol also states that an increase in SpO2 to ≥90% throughout the test would show a benefit to the patient1.AimHow many patients referred for assessment would benefit from prescription of ambulatory Oxygen based on the current BTS protocol?MethodsTest results, demographic and clinical data were collated for all patients referred for ambulatory Oxygen assessment over 1 year.Results88 patients were referred for assessment with 18 excluded (n=70). 11 patients only carried out the baseline test on air without progressing to the second test on oxygen as there was no significant desaturation during exercise. Of the 59 remaining patients 34 would be recommended ambulatory oxygen therapy, 19 would not and the remaining 6 may require higher flow rates than the 4L/min O2 that is the highest rate within the protocol. Only 18 patients (18/59=31%) had a decrease in BORG (felt better) by 10% or 1 point whilst on supplemental O2. 10 patients (10/59=17%) reported higher BORG scores on Oxygen (?fatigue, ? walked further).ConclusionOf the 70 patients included in the audit 34 (48.57%) would be recommended ambulatory oxygen therapy, 30 (42.86%) would not and the remaining 6 (8.57%) may require higher flow rates than the 4L/min that is the highest rate within the protocol. This protocol has been particularly useful during the COVID pandemic and the SOP has been shared with other departments.ReferencesHardinge M, Annandale J, Bourne S, et al. British Thoracic Society guidelines for home oxygen use in adults: accredited by NICE. Thorax 2015;70:i1-i43.\",\"PeriodicalId\":224722,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"‘Interview with a Vampire’ – Blood gas monitoring in clinical care\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"‘Interview with a Vampire’ – Blood gas monitoring in clinical care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax-2022-btsabstracts.256\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"‘Interview with a Vampire’ – Blood gas monitoring in clinical care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax-2022-btsabstracts.256","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
2005年,在跑步机上建立了一种盲法动态氧气评估方案。患者在跑步机上以设定的速度进行两次步行测试,每次测试15分钟,测试之间休息30分钟。患者在两项测试中都佩戴鼻管,通过鼻管接受2L/min的空气或氧气。患者每分钟用BORG量表对自己的呼吸困难进行评分,并通过耳探头和心率记录下血氧饱和度。距离增加(10%)或BORG评分下降(1分/10%)表明需要门诊氧气处方。英国胸科学会(BTS) 2015年动态氧疗评估方案也指出,在整个测试过程中,SpO2升高至≥90%将对患者有益1。目的根据目前的BTS方案,有多少患者可以从动态氧处方中获益?方法对所有1年内进行动态氧评估的患者的测试结果、人口学和临床数据进行整理。结果88例患者被转诊评估,其中18例被排除(n=70)。11例患者只进行了基线空气测试,没有进行第二次氧气测试,因为在运动期间没有明显的去饱和。在剩下的59名患者中,34名建议进行动态氧疗,19名不建议,其余6名可能需要高于4L/min的氧气流量,这是协议中的最高流速。只有18名患者(18/59=31%)在补充氧气时,BORG(感觉更好)下降了10%或1点。10例患者(10/59=17%)报告氧(?疲劳、?进一步走)。结论在审计的70例患者中,34例(48.57%)推荐动态氧疗,30例(42.86%)不推荐动态氧疗,其余6例(8.57%)可能需要高于方案规定的最高流量4L/min。该协议在COVID大流行期间特别有用,并与其他部门共享了SOP。参考文献:hardinge M, Annandale J, Bourne S,等。英国胸科学会成人家庭氧气使用指南:NICE认证。胸腔2015;70:i1-i43。
P121 An audit of ambulatory oxygen assessments utilising a pre-established blinded treadmill protocol
IntroductionA blinded ambulatory oxygen assessment protocol on a treadmill was established in 2005. Patients perform 2 walking tests, up to fifteen minutes each, on a treadmill at a set speed with a 30 minute rest between tests. The patient wears nasal cannulae on both tests, through which they receive 2L/min of air or Oxygen. Patients rate their breathlessness on a BORG scale every minute and this is recorded with Oxygen saturation via ear probe and heart rate. An increase in distance (10%) or decrease in BORG scores (1 point/10%) would indicate a need for ambulatory Oxygen prescription. The British Thoracic Society (BTS) 2015 ambulatory Oxygen therapy assessment protocol also states that an increase in SpO2 to ≥90% throughout the test would show a benefit to the patient1.AimHow many patients referred for assessment would benefit from prescription of ambulatory Oxygen based on the current BTS protocol?MethodsTest results, demographic and clinical data were collated for all patients referred for ambulatory Oxygen assessment over 1 year.Results88 patients were referred for assessment with 18 excluded (n=70). 11 patients only carried out the baseline test on air without progressing to the second test on oxygen as there was no significant desaturation during exercise. Of the 59 remaining patients 34 would be recommended ambulatory oxygen therapy, 19 would not and the remaining 6 may require higher flow rates than the 4L/min O2 that is the highest rate within the protocol. Only 18 patients (18/59=31%) had a decrease in BORG (felt better) by 10% or 1 point whilst on supplemental O2. 10 patients (10/59=17%) reported higher BORG scores on Oxygen (?fatigue, ? walked further).ConclusionOf the 70 patients included in the audit 34 (48.57%) would be recommended ambulatory oxygen therapy, 30 (42.86%) would not and the remaining 6 (8.57%) may require higher flow rates than the 4L/min that is the highest rate within the protocol. This protocol has been particularly useful during the COVID pandemic and the SOP has been shared with other departments.ReferencesHardinge M, Annandale J, Bourne S, et al. British Thoracic Society guidelines for home oxygen use in adults: accredited by NICE. Thorax 2015;70:i1-i43.