b谷歌Play幼儿教育应用评估

A. Chatzopoulos, Alexandros Karaflis, M. Kalogiannakis, A. Tzerachoglou, G. Cheirchanteri, Emmanouela Sfyroera, Eleni-Orsalia Sklavounou
{"title":"b谷歌Play幼儿教育应用评估","authors":"A. Chatzopoulos, Alexandros Karaflis, M. Kalogiannakis, A. Tzerachoglou, G. Cheirchanteri, Emmanouela Sfyroera, Eleni-Orsalia Sklavounou","doi":"10.25082/amler.2023.02.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the global retail market, there is a plethora of educational software: smartphone applications, computer programs, and websites with engaging educational activities that can be used at all levels of education: preschool, primary, secondary, tertiary, and especially in educational robotics and STEM education. However, today a teacher or a parent faces a dilemma: Which is the most educational and appropriate app for children to choose and use? This article aims to help parents, teachers, and other stakeholders in the education community. It has a double purpose: on the one hand, to present an evaluation rubric for educational apps, and on the other hand, to make use of it by offering the vital characteristics and the evaluation of well-known educational apps (n = 50) someone can download from Google Play Store (https://play.google.com). Αpp selection was based on the following criteria: a) to be suitable for early childhood education (kindergarten), b) to cover a wide range of learning objectives (e.g. maths, music, visual arts, language, science, programming, history, and environment) and, c) to be free to download. The educational rubric used was a modified version adopted by literature research.","PeriodicalId":405558,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research","volume":"101 7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Google Play educational apps for early childhood education\",\"authors\":\"A. Chatzopoulos, Alexandros Karaflis, M. Kalogiannakis, A. Tzerachoglou, G. Cheirchanteri, Emmanouela Sfyroera, Eleni-Orsalia Sklavounou\",\"doi\":\"10.25082/amler.2023.02.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the global retail market, there is a plethora of educational software: smartphone applications, computer programs, and websites with engaging educational activities that can be used at all levels of education: preschool, primary, secondary, tertiary, and especially in educational robotics and STEM education. However, today a teacher or a parent faces a dilemma: Which is the most educational and appropriate app for children to choose and use? This article aims to help parents, teachers, and other stakeholders in the education community. It has a double purpose: on the one hand, to present an evaluation rubric for educational apps, and on the other hand, to make use of it by offering the vital characteristics and the evaluation of well-known educational apps (n = 50) someone can download from Google Play Store (https://play.google.com). Αpp selection was based on the following criteria: a) to be suitable for early childhood education (kindergarten), b) to cover a wide range of learning objectives (e.g. maths, music, visual arts, language, science, programming, history, and environment) and, c) to be free to download. The educational rubric used was a modified version adopted by literature research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":405558,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research\",\"volume\":\"101 7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25082/amler.2023.02.004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25082/amler.2023.02.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在全球零售市场上,有大量的教育软件:智能手机应用程序,计算机程序和具有引人入胜的教育活动的网站,可以用于各级教育:学前教育,小学,中学,大学,特别是教育机器人和STEM教育。然而,今天的老师或家长都面临着一个两难的问题:哪一款应用最具教育意义,最适合孩子选择和使用?本文旨在帮助家长、教师和教育界的其他利益相关者。它有双重目的:一方面,为教育应用程序提供一个评估标准,另一方面,通过提供重要特征和对知名教育应用程序(n = 50)的评估,人们可以从Google Play商店(https://play.google.com)下载。Αpp的选择基于以下标准:a)适合幼儿教育(幼儿园),b)涵盖广泛的学习目标(例如数学,音乐,视觉艺术,语言,科学,编程,历史和环境),以及c)免费下载。所使用的教育标题为文献研究所采用的修改版。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Google Play educational apps for early childhood education
In the global retail market, there is a plethora of educational software: smartphone applications, computer programs, and websites with engaging educational activities that can be used at all levels of education: preschool, primary, secondary, tertiary, and especially in educational robotics and STEM education. However, today a teacher or a parent faces a dilemma: Which is the most educational and appropriate app for children to choose and use? This article aims to help parents, teachers, and other stakeholders in the education community. It has a double purpose: on the one hand, to present an evaluation rubric for educational apps, and on the other hand, to make use of it by offering the vital characteristics and the evaluation of well-known educational apps (n = 50) someone can download from Google Play Store (https://play.google.com). Αpp selection was based on the following criteria: a) to be suitable for early childhood education (kindergarten), b) to cover a wide range of learning objectives (e.g. maths, music, visual arts, language, science, programming, history, and environment) and, c) to be free to download. The educational rubric used was a modified version adopted by literature research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信