预测网络钓鱼受害:保护和脆弱策略的角色和决策风格

Eric Chan-Tin, Loretta J. Stalans, Spencer Johnston, D. Reyes, S. Kennison
{"title":"预测网络钓鱼受害:保护和脆弱策略的角色和决策风格","authors":"Eric Chan-Tin, Loretta J. Stalans, Spencer Johnston, D. Reyes, S. Kennison","doi":"10.1145/3526064.3534107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Phishing is a common vector for cybercrime and hacking. This research examines participants' personality styles (e.g. decision-making styles, self-control) and the likelihood of falling victim to phishing attacks. Over 300 participants completed an online survey assessing protective and vulnerable strategies, personality styles, trust in people, prior victimization from catphishing or identity theft, and demographics information. Unbeknownst to the participants, 2 to 4 weeks after completing the survey they received a phishing e-mail asking them to click on a link. Individuals with a stronger systematic decision-making style were more likely to have a greater number of protective strategies, and those with greater protective strategies were less likely to be a victim of catphishing and identity theft. Individuals with low avoidant decision-making styles and prior vulnerable strategies were more likely to be phished. These findings suggest that learning protective strategies and not using vulnerable strategies are insufficient to lower substantially the risk of being phished. Training might be improved through considering the match between decision-making styles and the content of the training.","PeriodicalId":183096,"journal":{"name":"Fifth International Workshop on Systems and Network Telemetry and Analytics","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting Phishing Victimization: Roles of Protective and Vulnerable Strategies and Decision-Making Styles\",\"authors\":\"Eric Chan-Tin, Loretta J. Stalans, Spencer Johnston, D. Reyes, S. Kennison\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3526064.3534107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Phishing is a common vector for cybercrime and hacking. This research examines participants' personality styles (e.g. decision-making styles, self-control) and the likelihood of falling victim to phishing attacks. Over 300 participants completed an online survey assessing protective and vulnerable strategies, personality styles, trust in people, prior victimization from catphishing or identity theft, and demographics information. Unbeknownst to the participants, 2 to 4 weeks after completing the survey they received a phishing e-mail asking them to click on a link. Individuals with a stronger systematic decision-making style were more likely to have a greater number of protective strategies, and those with greater protective strategies were less likely to be a victim of catphishing and identity theft. Individuals with low avoidant decision-making styles and prior vulnerable strategies were more likely to be phished. These findings suggest that learning protective strategies and not using vulnerable strategies are insufficient to lower substantially the risk of being phished. Training might be improved through considering the match between decision-making styles and the content of the training.\",\"PeriodicalId\":183096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fifth International Workshop on Systems and Network Telemetry and Analytics\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fifth International Workshop on Systems and Network Telemetry and Analytics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3526064.3534107\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fifth International Workshop on Systems and Network Telemetry and Analytics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3526064.3534107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

网络钓鱼是网络犯罪和黑客攻击的常见载体。这项研究考察了参与者的个性风格(例如决策风格、自我控制)和成为网络钓鱼攻击受害者的可能性。300多名参与者完成了一项在线调查,评估了保护和易受伤害的策略、个性风格、对他人的信任、之前受到钓鱼或身份盗窃的伤害以及人口统计信息。参与者不知道的是,在完成调查的2到4周后,他们收到了一封网络钓鱼邮件,要求他们点击一个链接。具有更强的系统性决策风格的个体更有可能拥有更多的保护策略,而那些拥有更多保护策略的人更不可能成为钓鱼和身份盗窃的受害者。具有低回避决策风格和先前脆弱策略的个体更容易被钓鱼。这些发现表明,学习保护策略和不使用易受攻击的策略不足以大大降低被钓鱼的风险。通过考虑决策方式与训练内容的匹配,可以提高训练水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predicting Phishing Victimization: Roles of Protective and Vulnerable Strategies and Decision-Making Styles
Phishing is a common vector for cybercrime and hacking. This research examines participants' personality styles (e.g. decision-making styles, self-control) and the likelihood of falling victim to phishing attacks. Over 300 participants completed an online survey assessing protective and vulnerable strategies, personality styles, trust in people, prior victimization from catphishing or identity theft, and demographics information. Unbeknownst to the participants, 2 to 4 weeks after completing the survey they received a phishing e-mail asking them to click on a link. Individuals with a stronger systematic decision-making style were more likely to have a greater number of protective strategies, and those with greater protective strategies were less likely to be a victim of catphishing and identity theft. Individuals with low avoidant decision-making styles and prior vulnerable strategies were more likely to be phished. These findings suggest that learning protective strategies and not using vulnerable strategies are insufficient to lower substantially the risk of being phished. Training might be improved through considering the match between decision-making styles and the content of the training.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信