多接入信道退避协议分析

J. Håstad, F. Leighton, B. Rogoff
{"title":"多接入信道退避协议分析","authors":"J. Håstad, F. Leighton, B. Rogoff","doi":"10.1145/28395.28422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the paper, we analyze the stochastic behavior of backoff protocols for multiple access channels such as the Ethernet. In particular, we prove that binary exponential backoff is unstable if the arrival rate of new messages at each station is &lgr;/N for any number of stations N exceeding 1 and any overall arrival rate &lgr; exceeding .567 + 1/4N - 2. More importantly, we also prove that any superlinear polynomial backoff protocol (e.g., quadratic backoff) is stable for any set of arrival rates that sum to less than one, and any number of stations. The results significantly extend the previous work in the area, and provide the first examples of acknowledgement based protocols known to be stable for a nonnegligible overall arrival rate distributed over an arbitrarily large number of stations. The results also disprove a popular assumption that exponential backoff is the best choice among acknowledgement based protocols for systems with large overall arrival rates. Finally, we prove that any linear or sublinear backoff protocol is unstable if the arrival rate at each station is &lgr;/N for any fixed &lgr; and sufficiently large N.","PeriodicalId":161795,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the nineteenth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"225","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of backoff protocols for multiple access channels\",\"authors\":\"J. Håstad, F. Leighton, B. Rogoff\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/28395.28422\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the paper, we analyze the stochastic behavior of backoff protocols for multiple access channels such as the Ethernet. In particular, we prove that binary exponential backoff is unstable if the arrival rate of new messages at each station is &lgr;/N for any number of stations N exceeding 1 and any overall arrival rate &lgr; exceeding .567 + 1/4N - 2. More importantly, we also prove that any superlinear polynomial backoff protocol (e.g., quadratic backoff) is stable for any set of arrival rates that sum to less than one, and any number of stations. The results significantly extend the previous work in the area, and provide the first examples of acknowledgement based protocols known to be stable for a nonnegligible overall arrival rate distributed over an arbitrarily large number of stations. The results also disprove a popular assumption that exponential backoff is the best choice among acknowledgement based protocols for systems with large overall arrival rates. Finally, we prove that any linear or sublinear backoff protocol is unstable if the arrival rate at each station is &lgr;/N for any fixed &lgr; and sufficiently large N.\",\"PeriodicalId\":161795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the nineteenth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1987-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"225\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the nineteenth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/28395.28422\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the nineteenth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/28395.28422","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 225

摘要

本文分析了以以太网为代表的多接入信道中退避协议的随机行为。特别地,我们证明了对于任意数量的N大于1的站点,当每个站点的新消息到达率为&lgr;/N,且任意总体到达率为&lgr;超过。567 + 1/4N - 2。更重要的是,我们还证明了任何超线性多项式退退协议(例如,二次退退)对于任何一组和小于1的到达率以及任何数量的站点都是稳定的。结果显著扩展了该领域以前的工作,并提供了已知的基于确认的协议的第一个例子,该协议对于分布在任意大量站点上的不可忽略的总体到达率是稳定的。结果还反驳了一个流行的假设,即对于具有大总体到达率的系统,指数回退是基于确认的协议中的最佳选择。最后,我们证明了对于任意固定的后退协议,如果每个站点的到达率为&lgr;/N,则任何线性或次线性后退协议都是不稳定的。和足够大的N。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of backoff protocols for multiple access channels
In the paper, we analyze the stochastic behavior of backoff protocols for multiple access channels such as the Ethernet. In particular, we prove that binary exponential backoff is unstable if the arrival rate of new messages at each station is &lgr;/N for any number of stations N exceeding 1 and any overall arrival rate &lgr; exceeding .567 + 1/4N - 2. More importantly, we also prove that any superlinear polynomial backoff protocol (e.g., quadratic backoff) is stable for any set of arrival rates that sum to less than one, and any number of stations. The results significantly extend the previous work in the area, and provide the first examples of acknowledgement based protocols known to be stable for a nonnegligible overall arrival rate distributed over an arbitrarily large number of stations. The results also disprove a popular assumption that exponential backoff is the best choice among acknowledgement based protocols for systems with large overall arrival rates. Finally, we prove that any linear or sublinear backoff protocol is unstable if the arrival rate at each station is &lgr;/N for any fixed &lgr; and sufficiently large N.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信