公共行政理论和方法论

Jurnal Governance Jurnal Kebijakan & Manajemen Publik, Mas Roro Lilik Ekowanti
{"title":"公共行政理论和方法论","authors":"Jurnal Governance Jurnal Kebijakan & Manajemen Publik, Mas Roro Lilik Ekowanti","doi":"10.38156/governancejkmp.v1i2.28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the context of an ontology of administrative science that is under stood by four key administrative, organizational, administrative principles, administrator. The essence of the philosophy of administration is a trust and responsibility. The value of trust and responsibility in the future be important for the development of administrative science in addition to the effective-ness, efficiency, rationality and fairness. While the context of epistemology, the study of public administration because the number was not less important to follow three methodologies: (1). Lack of testing the theory; (2). The lack of cumulative research, because of low initial study and the low effort to build theory through the early work; (3). Publication of research is rarely done. Methodological limitations associated with restriction and development of administrative theory in epistemology. The choice of strategy of both qualitative and quantitative research relevant to the development of contemporary public administration theory. A variety of public problems and issues of public administration provide a space for the use of methods in public administration, the choice of using the combination method in the future become a rational choice in order to obtain validity and reliability in finding generalizations as well asthe depth of analysis in order to obtain the conclusion of representation. With the methodology of public administration that are easier to be under stood by scientists administration is expected to produce development of administrative science theory of the state administration which is conducive for developing countries especially Indonesia.","PeriodicalId":231503,"journal":{"name":"Governance, JKMP (Governance, Jurnal Kebijakan & Manajemen Publik)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"teori administrasi dan metodologi administrasi publik\",\"authors\":\"Jurnal Governance Jurnal Kebijakan & Manajemen Publik, Mas Roro Lilik Ekowanti\",\"doi\":\"10.38156/governancejkmp.v1i2.28\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the context of an ontology of administrative science that is under stood by four key administrative, organizational, administrative principles, administrator. The essence of the philosophy of administration is a trust and responsibility. The value of trust and responsibility in the future be important for the development of administrative science in addition to the effective-ness, efficiency, rationality and fairness. While the context of epistemology, the study of public administration because the number was not less important to follow three methodologies: (1). Lack of testing the theory; (2). The lack of cumulative research, because of low initial study and the low effort to build theory through the early work; (3). Publication of research is rarely done. Methodological limitations associated with restriction and development of administrative theory in epistemology. The choice of strategy of both qualitative and quantitative research relevant to the development of contemporary public administration theory. A variety of public problems and issues of public administration provide a space for the use of methods in public administration, the choice of using the combination method in the future become a rational choice in order to obtain validity and reliability in finding generalizations as well asthe depth of analysis in order to obtain the conclusion of representation. With the methodology of public administration that are easier to be under stood by scientists administration is expected to produce development of administrative science theory of the state administration which is conducive for developing countries especially Indonesia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":231503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Governance, JKMP (Governance, Jurnal Kebijakan & Manajemen Publik)\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Governance, JKMP (Governance, Jurnal Kebijakan & Manajemen Publik)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.38156/governancejkmp.v1i2.28\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Governance, JKMP (Governance, Jurnal Kebijakan & Manajemen Publik)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38156/governancejkmp.v1i2.28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在行政学本体论的背景下,以行政、组织、行政原则、行政管理原则、行政管理原则等四个关键要素来理解行政科学。行政哲学的本质是信任和责任。除了效能、效率、理性和公平之外,信任和责任的价值在未来对行政科学的发展也具有重要意义。而在认识论的背景下,公共行政的研究因为数量的不重要而遵循了三种方法论:(1)缺乏理论检验;(2)缺乏累积性研究,因为初期研究较少,通过早期工作构建理论的努力较少;(3)研究成果很少发表。与认识论中行政理论的制约和发展相关的方法论局限。定性与定量研究的策略选择关系到当代公共行政理论的发展。各种各样的公共问题和公共行政问题为公共行政方法的运用提供了空间,未来选择使用组合方法成为一种理性选择,以获得有效性和可靠性,以寻找概括,以及深度分析,以获得代表性的结论。以更容易被科学家理解的公共行政方法论,行政管理学有望产生有利于发展中国家特别是印度尼西亚的国家行政科学理论的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
teori administrasi dan metodologi administrasi publik
In the context of an ontology of administrative science that is under stood by four key administrative, organizational, administrative principles, administrator. The essence of the philosophy of administration is a trust and responsibility. The value of trust and responsibility in the future be important for the development of administrative science in addition to the effective-ness, efficiency, rationality and fairness. While the context of epistemology, the study of public administration because the number was not less important to follow three methodologies: (1). Lack of testing the theory; (2). The lack of cumulative research, because of low initial study and the low effort to build theory through the early work; (3). Publication of research is rarely done. Methodological limitations associated with restriction and development of administrative theory in epistemology. The choice of strategy of both qualitative and quantitative research relevant to the development of contemporary public administration theory. A variety of public problems and issues of public administration provide a space for the use of methods in public administration, the choice of using the combination method in the future become a rational choice in order to obtain validity and reliability in finding generalizations as well asthe depth of analysis in order to obtain the conclusion of representation. With the methodology of public administration that are easier to be under stood by scientists administration is expected to produce development of administrative science theory of the state administration which is conducive for developing countries especially Indonesia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信