看不见的手。美国法院和独立机构的监管

J. Simon, William Conrad
{"title":"看不见的手。美国法院和独立机构的监管","authors":"J. Simon, William Conrad","doi":"10.3406/RESO.1993.3254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary: A historical examination is made of how the executive, legislative and judicial branches of the US government have dealt with the overwhelmingly complicated process of regulating public utilities. It points out that the specialized entities mandated by Congress to control these industries must strike a balance between conflicting interests. These so-called independent agencies have to achieve a workable compromise between the protection of the industry and of the users under some often very vague criteria (public interest, fairness, reasonableness). The process of regulation as a whole is here seen as a bi-polar system of state intervention ensured by the independent authority (commissions) /judicial pair. This dual system is complex, constraining and all-embracing, even if it evolves towards more pragmatic approaches.","PeriodicalId":213999,"journal":{"name":"Réseaux. The French journal of communication","volume":"81 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The invisible hand. Regulation by the courts and independent authorities in the United States\",\"authors\":\"J. Simon, William Conrad\",\"doi\":\"10.3406/RESO.1993.3254\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Summary: A historical examination is made of how the executive, legislative and judicial branches of the US government have dealt with the overwhelmingly complicated process of regulating public utilities. It points out that the specialized entities mandated by Congress to control these industries must strike a balance between conflicting interests. These so-called independent agencies have to achieve a workable compromise between the protection of the industry and of the users under some often very vague criteria (public interest, fairness, reasonableness). The process of regulation as a whole is here seen as a bi-polar system of state intervention ensured by the independent authority (commissions) /judicial pair. This dual system is complex, constraining and all-embracing, even if it evolves towards more pragmatic approaches.\",\"PeriodicalId\":213999,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Réseaux. The French journal of communication\",\"volume\":\"81 2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Réseaux. The French journal of communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3406/RESO.1993.3254\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Réseaux. The French journal of communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3406/RESO.1993.3254","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:本文对美国政府的行政、立法和司法部门如何处理极其复杂的公用事业监管过程进行了历史考察。它指出,国会授权控制这些行业的专门实体必须在相互冲突的利益之间取得平衡。这些所谓的独立机构必须在一些通常非常模糊的标准(公共利益、公平、合理)下,在保护行业和保护用户之间达成可行的妥协。在这里,整个监管过程被视为一个由独立权威机构(委员会)/司法机构确保的国家干预的两极系统。这种双重体系是复杂的、约束的和包罗万象的,即使它朝着更务实的方向发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The invisible hand. Regulation by the courts and independent authorities in the United States
Summary: A historical examination is made of how the executive, legislative and judicial branches of the US government have dealt with the overwhelmingly complicated process of regulating public utilities. It points out that the specialized entities mandated by Congress to control these industries must strike a balance between conflicting interests. These so-called independent agencies have to achieve a workable compromise between the protection of the industry and of the users under some often very vague criteria (public interest, fairness, reasonableness). The process of regulation as a whole is here seen as a bi-polar system of state intervention ensured by the independent authority (commissions) /judicial pair. This dual system is complex, constraining and all-embracing, even if it evolves towards more pragmatic approaches.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信