新加坡社区和临床样本的赌博风险和保护因素

P. Sivagnanam, T. Oei, D. Denise, Lai Wei
{"title":"新加坡社区和临床样本的赌博风险和保护因素","authors":"P. Sivagnanam, T. Oei, D. Denise, Lai Wei","doi":"10.33582/2637-4528/1008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Problem Gambling (PG) has been linked to several socio-cognitive risk and protective factors; However, knowledge on their impact on problem gamblers in Asia remains. This study compares gambling risk and protective factors between clinical problem gamblers and community individuals in Singapore. \n \nMethods: Data on gambling risk and protective factors, and PG severity were collected from 150 clinical problem gamblers and 150 community individuals through paper surveys. \n \nResults: Clinical problem gamblers scored significantly higher in PG severity, gambling-related negative thoughts and urge and psychological distress, and scored significantly lower in gambling refusal self-efficacy, hope, resilience and life satisfaction, than community participants. There were also more significant relationships between risk and protective factors among clinical than community participants. \n \nConclusion: Gambling-related protective factors are relevant to clinical problem gamblers in the Singapore context, which could be further leveraged upon to inform and refine existing PG rehabilitation efforts.","PeriodicalId":346131,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Addiction and Recovery","volume":"575 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gambling risk and protective factors among community and clinical samples in Singapore\",\"authors\":\"P. Sivagnanam, T. Oei, D. Denise, Lai Wei\",\"doi\":\"10.33582/2637-4528/1008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: Problem Gambling (PG) has been linked to several socio-cognitive risk and protective factors; However, knowledge on their impact on problem gamblers in Asia remains. This study compares gambling risk and protective factors between clinical problem gamblers and community individuals in Singapore. \\n \\nMethods: Data on gambling risk and protective factors, and PG severity were collected from 150 clinical problem gamblers and 150 community individuals through paper surveys. \\n \\nResults: Clinical problem gamblers scored significantly higher in PG severity, gambling-related negative thoughts and urge and psychological distress, and scored significantly lower in gambling refusal self-efficacy, hope, resilience and life satisfaction, than community participants. There were also more significant relationships between risk and protective factors among clinical than community participants. \\n \\nConclusion: Gambling-related protective factors are relevant to clinical problem gamblers in the Singapore context, which could be further leveraged upon to inform and refine existing PG rehabilitation efforts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":346131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Addiction and Recovery\",\"volume\":\"575 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Addiction and Recovery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33582/2637-4528/1008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Addiction and Recovery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33582/2637-4528/1008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:问题赌博(PG)已联系到几个社会认知风险和保护因素;然而,他们对亚洲问题赌徒的影响的了解仍然存在。本研究比较了新加坡临床问题赌徒和社区个人之间的赌博风险和保护因素。方法:对150名临床问题赌徒和150名社区居民进行问卷调查,收集其赌博风险、保护因素、PG严重程度等数据。结果:临床问题赌徒在PG严重程度、赌博相关消极思想、冲动和心理困扰得分显著高于社区参与者,在拒绝赌博自我效能感、希望、恢复力和生活满意度得分显著低于社区参与者。与社区参与者相比,临床参与者的风险因素和保护因素之间的关系也更为显著。结论:赌博相关的保护因素与新加坡的临床问题赌徒有关,可以进一步利用这些因素来通知和完善现有的PG康复工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gambling risk and protective factors among community and clinical samples in Singapore
Objectives: Problem Gambling (PG) has been linked to several socio-cognitive risk and protective factors; However, knowledge on their impact on problem gamblers in Asia remains. This study compares gambling risk and protective factors between clinical problem gamblers and community individuals in Singapore. Methods: Data on gambling risk and protective factors, and PG severity were collected from 150 clinical problem gamblers and 150 community individuals through paper surveys. Results: Clinical problem gamblers scored significantly higher in PG severity, gambling-related negative thoughts and urge and psychological distress, and scored significantly lower in gambling refusal self-efficacy, hope, resilience and life satisfaction, than community participants. There were also more significant relationships between risk and protective factors among clinical than community participants. Conclusion: Gambling-related protective factors are relevant to clinical problem gamblers in the Singapore context, which could be further leveraged upon to inform and refine existing PG rehabilitation efforts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信