大国的人工智能竞争:权力与安全之谜

Rong-hui Zhu, Ziwen Feng, Qi Chen
{"title":"大国的人工智能竞争:权力与安全之谜","authors":"Rong-hui Zhu, Ziwen Feng, Qi Chen","doi":"10.1109/ICNISC57059.2022.00051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Artificial intelligence is an important core technology leading a new round of scientific and technological revolution, which will inevitably bring profound changes to military operations, industrial upgrading and social governance modernization. Faced with the potential of this technology to reshape the international pattern, major countries in the world have successively raised the development of artificial intelligence to the national strategic level, which has led to a fierce competition in science and technology among big countries, among which the most noticeable one is the cold war of artificial intelligence launched by the United States against China. The existing research believes that the United States maintains global leadership and discourages China's technological catch-up drive the direction of American artificial intelligence policy towards China. Through the policy investigation of the last two American governments, it can be found that the American competition for artificial intelligence in China has a strong political color of power. The White House and the State Council are obsessed with stigmatizing the application of artificial intelligence in China, showing a long-term preference for institutional leadership and the right to make rules. However, the Ministry of National Defense, the Ministry of Finance and the Ministry of Commerce have decision-making contradictions and position exchanges in the specific implementation of maintaining American technological hegemony and supply chain stability. In advancing the iteration of military intelligence, the US military's empowerment of offensive weapons not only reduces the credibility of maintaining strategic stability signals, but also deepens the security dilemma between China and the United States. These findings are helpful to understand the complex signals released by the “security” of American artificial intelligence technology, and provide a possible perspective and direction for exploring global security governance in the intelligent age.","PeriodicalId":286467,"journal":{"name":"2022 8th Annual International Conference on Network and Information Systems for Computers (ICNISC)","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Competition of Artificial Intelligence in Big Countries: the Mystery of Power and Security\",\"authors\":\"Rong-hui Zhu, Ziwen Feng, Qi Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICNISC57059.2022.00051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Artificial intelligence is an important core technology leading a new round of scientific and technological revolution, which will inevitably bring profound changes to military operations, industrial upgrading and social governance modernization. Faced with the potential of this technology to reshape the international pattern, major countries in the world have successively raised the development of artificial intelligence to the national strategic level, which has led to a fierce competition in science and technology among big countries, among which the most noticeable one is the cold war of artificial intelligence launched by the United States against China. The existing research believes that the United States maintains global leadership and discourages China's technological catch-up drive the direction of American artificial intelligence policy towards China. Through the policy investigation of the last two American governments, it can be found that the American competition for artificial intelligence in China has a strong political color of power. The White House and the State Council are obsessed with stigmatizing the application of artificial intelligence in China, showing a long-term preference for institutional leadership and the right to make rules. However, the Ministry of National Defense, the Ministry of Finance and the Ministry of Commerce have decision-making contradictions and position exchanges in the specific implementation of maintaining American technological hegemony and supply chain stability. In advancing the iteration of military intelligence, the US military's empowerment of offensive weapons not only reduces the credibility of maintaining strategic stability signals, but also deepens the security dilemma between China and the United States. These findings are helpful to understand the complex signals released by the “security” of American artificial intelligence technology, and provide a possible perspective and direction for exploring global security governance in the intelligent age.\",\"PeriodicalId\":286467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 8th Annual International Conference on Network and Information Systems for Computers (ICNISC)\",\"volume\":\"78 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 8th Annual International Conference on Network and Information Systems for Computers (ICNISC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNISC57059.2022.00051\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 8th Annual International Conference on Network and Information Systems for Computers (ICNISC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNISC57059.2022.00051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工智能是引领新一轮科技革命的重要核心技术,必将给军事作战、产业升级、社会治理现代化带来深刻变革。面对这项技术重塑国际格局的潜力,世界主要国家纷纷将人工智能的发展提升到国家战略的高度,导致了大国之间激烈的科技竞争,其中最引人注目的是美国对中国发起的人工智能冷战。现有研究认为,美国保持全球领导地位,不鼓励中国的技术追赶推动美国对华人工智能政策的方向。通过对前两届美国政府的政策考察,可以发现美国在中国的人工智能竞争带有浓厚的权力政治色彩。白宫和国务院痴迷于污名化人工智能在中国的应用,表现出对机构领导和制定规则权的长期偏好。然而,在维护美国技术霸权和供应链稳定的具体实施中,国防部、财政部和商务部存在决策矛盾和立场交流。在推进军事情报迭代的过程中,美军对进攻性武器的授权,不仅降低了维护战略稳定信号的可信度,也加深了中美之间的安全困境。这些发现有助于理解美国人工智能技术“安全”释放的复杂信号,并为探索智能时代的全球安全治理提供可能的视角和方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Competition of Artificial Intelligence in Big Countries: the Mystery of Power and Security
Artificial intelligence is an important core technology leading a new round of scientific and technological revolution, which will inevitably bring profound changes to military operations, industrial upgrading and social governance modernization. Faced with the potential of this technology to reshape the international pattern, major countries in the world have successively raised the development of artificial intelligence to the national strategic level, which has led to a fierce competition in science and technology among big countries, among which the most noticeable one is the cold war of artificial intelligence launched by the United States against China. The existing research believes that the United States maintains global leadership and discourages China's technological catch-up drive the direction of American artificial intelligence policy towards China. Through the policy investigation of the last two American governments, it can be found that the American competition for artificial intelligence in China has a strong political color of power. The White House and the State Council are obsessed with stigmatizing the application of artificial intelligence in China, showing a long-term preference for institutional leadership and the right to make rules. However, the Ministry of National Defense, the Ministry of Finance and the Ministry of Commerce have decision-making contradictions and position exchanges in the specific implementation of maintaining American technological hegemony and supply chain stability. In advancing the iteration of military intelligence, the US military's empowerment of offensive weapons not only reduces the credibility of maintaining strategic stability signals, but also deepens the security dilemma between China and the United States. These findings are helpful to understand the complex signals released by the “security” of American artificial intelligence technology, and provide a possible perspective and direction for exploring global security governance in the intelligent age.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信