我们应该相信道德现实主义吗?论道德现实主义在道德分歧中的辩护责任

International Journal of Theology, Philosophy and Science Pub Date : 2022-11-27 DOI:10.26520/ijtps.2022.6.11.54-62

Shuoning Zhang

{"title":"我们应该相信道德现实主义吗?论道德现实主义在道德分歧中的辩护责任","authors":"Shuoning Zhang","doi":"10.26520/ijtps.2022.6.11.54-62","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Moral realism and moral relativism are two influential dogmas in moral philosophy. This paper examines relativism’s possible position and the burden of justification of a particular form of realism in the problem of moral disagreement. This paper concludes that neither position is morally acceptable, and this paper further offers a hint to a middle way: moral pragmatism","PeriodicalId":150920,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Theology, Philosophy and Science","volume":"519 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SHOULD WE BELIEVE IN MORAL REALISM? ON THE BURDEN OF JUSTIFICATION OF MORAL REALISM IN MORAL DISAGREEMENTS\",\"authors\":\"Shuoning Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.26520/ijtps.2022.6.11.54-62\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Moral realism and moral relativism are two influential dogmas in moral philosophy. This paper examines relativism’s possible position and the burden of justification of a particular form of realism in the problem of moral disagreement. This paper concludes that neither position is morally acceptable, and this paper further offers a hint to a middle way: moral pragmatism\",\"PeriodicalId\":150920,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Theology, Philosophy and Science\",\"volume\":\"519 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Theology, Philosophy and Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26520/ijtps.2022.6.11.54-62\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Theology, Philosophy and Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26520/ijtps.2022.6.11.54-62","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

道德实在论和道德相对主义是道德哲学中有影响的两大教条。本文考察了相对主义在道德分歧问题上的可能立场和一种特殊形式的现实主义的辩护负担。本文的结论是，这两种立场在道德上都是不可接受的，并进一步暗示了一条中间道路:道德实用主义

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

SHOULD WE BELIEVE IN MORAL REALISM? ON THE BURDEN OF JUSTIFICATION OF MORAL REALISM IN MORAL DISAGREEMENTS

Moral realism and moral relativism are two influential dogmas in moral philosophy. This paper examines relativism’s possible position and the burden of justification of a particular form of realism in the problem of moral disagreement. This paper concludes that neither position is morally acceptable, and this paper further offers a hint to a middle way: moral pragmatism

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

International Journal of Theology, Philosophy and Science

自引率

0.00%

发文量