利益相关者利益的权衡:来自反垄断调查的证据

Giacinta Cestone, Jiaying Li, P. Volpin
{"title":"利益相关者利益的权衡:来自反垄断调查的证据","authors":"Giacinta Cestone, Jiaying Li, P. Volpin","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3773448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We investigate how firms trade off the interests of different stakeholders when their industry comes under antitrust scrutiny. Using cartel cases opened by the European Commission between 1994 and 2019 in a difference-in-difference setup, we find that cartel investigations adversely affect the performance of firms in the affected industry, as compared to adjacent industries. In response to the shock, firms resort to restructuring strategies by increasing mass layoffs and (to a smaller extent) large-scale asset sales within three years after the investigation is opened. The increase in mass layoffs is partly mitigated for firms operating in countries with stronger employment protection regulations. We find no evidence that firms pass the burden of the shock onto shareholders through lower payouts. Our paper suggests that providers of labor, rather than capital, are paying the price for increased antitrust scrutiny after infringements of competition law.<br>","PeriodicalId":206501,"journal":{"name":"European Economics: Labor & Social Conditions eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trading Off Stakeholder Interests: Evidence from Antitrust Investigations\",\"authors\":\"Giacinta Cestone, Jiaying Li, P. Volpin\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3773448\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We investigate how firms trade off the interests of different stakeholders when their industry comes under antitrust scrutiny. Using cartel cases opened by the European Commission between 1994 and 2019 in a difference-in-difference setup, we find that cartel investigations adversely affect the performance of firms in the affected industry, as compared to adjacent industries. In response to the shock, firms resort to restructuring strategies by increasing mass layoffs and (to a smaller extent) large-scale asset sales within three years after the investigation is opened. The increase in mass layoffs is partly mitigated for firms operating in countries with stronger employment protection regulations. We find no evidence that firms pass the burden of the shock onto shareholders through lower payouts. Our paper suggests that providers of labor, rather than capital, are paying the price for increased antitrust scrutiny after infringements of competition law.<br>\",\"PeriodicalId\":206501,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Economics: Labor & Social Conditions eJournal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Economics: Labor & Social Conditions eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3773448\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Economics: Labor & Social Conditions eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3773448","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们调查了企业在其行业受到反垄断审查时如何权衡不同利益相关者的利益。利用欧盟委员会在1994年至2019年期间在差异中差异设置下审理的卡特尔案件,我们发现,与相邻行业相比,卡特尔调查对受影响行业企业的绩效产生了不利影响。因此,在调查开始后的3年内,企业将采取大规模裁员和(较小程度上)大规模资产出售等结构调整战略。在就业保护法规更强的国家经营的公司,在一定程度上减轻了大规模裁员的增加。我们没有发现证据表明公司通过降低派息将冲击的负担转嫁给了股东。我们的论文表明,在违反竞争法后,劳动力而不是资本的提供者正在为加强反垄断审查付出代价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Trading Off Stakeholder Interests: Evidence from Antitrust Investigations
We investigate how firms trade off the interests of different stakeholders when their industry comes under antitrust scrutiny. Using cartel cases opened by the European Commission between 1994 and 2019 in a difference-in-difference setup, we find that cartel investigations adversely affect the performance of firms in the affected industry, as compared to adjacent industries. In response to the shock, firms resort to restructuring strategies by increasing mass layoffs and (to a smaller extent) large-scale asset sales within three years after the investigation is opened. The increase in mass layoffs is partly mitigated for firms operating in countries with stronger employment protection regulations. We find no evidence that firms pass the burden of the shock onto shareholders through lower payouts. Our paper suggests that providers of labor, rather than capital, are paying the price for increased antitrust scrutiny after infringements of competition law.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信