探索利他主义的对话认识论:对Mitchell和Eiroa-Orosa的回答

H. Intezar, P. Sullivan
{"title":"探索利他主义的对话认识论:对Mitchell和Eiroa-Orosa的回答","authors":"H. Intezar, P. Sullivan","doi":"10.1080/23269995.2018.1511340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThis is a reply to Sue Mitchell and Francisco J. Eiroa-Orosa’s ‘Love your enemy.’ The latter seeks to explore the self-transcending potential of altruistic behaviour through a dialogical paradigm. It not only initiates fresh discussion on the subject of altruism, but also advances new discussion on Bakhtinian aesthetics. For the continuation of this forward momentum, we suggest a more nuanced approach to the placement of the ‘researcher’ within the applied methodological matrix. Similarly, we also advocate for the synthesising of research tools, often appropriated by theological studies, into said methodological matrix.This is a reply to:Mitchell, Sue and Eiroa-Orosa, Francisco J. 2018. “Love your enemy? An aesthetic discourse analysis of self-transcendence in values-motivated altruism.” Global Discourse https://doi.org/10.1080/23269995.2018.1511766","PeriodicalId":213164,"journal":{"name":"Cultivating New Post-secular Political Space","volume":"269 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Carving a dialogical epistemology for investigating altruism: A reply to Mitchell and Eiroa–Orosa\",\"authors\":\"H. Intezar, P. Sullivan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23269995.2018.1511340\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTThis is a reply to Sue Mitchell and Francisco J. Eiroa-Orosa’s ‘Love your enemy.’ The latter seeks to explore the self-transcending potential of altruistic behaviour through a dialogical paradigm. It not only initiates fresh discussion on the subject of altruism, but also advances new discussion on Bakhtinian aesthetics. For the continuation of this forward momentum, we suggest a more nuanced approach to the placement of the ‘researcher’ within the applied methodological matrix. Similarly, we also advocate for the synthesising of research tools, often appropriated by theological studies, into said methodological matrix.This is a reply to:Mitchell, Sue and Eiroa-Orosa, Francisco J. 2018. “Love your enemy? An aesthetic discourse analysis of self-transcendence in values-motivated altruism.” Global Discourse https://doi.org/10.1080/23269995.2018.1511766\",\"PeriodicalId\":213164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cultivating New Post-secular Political Space\",\"volume\":\"269 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cultivating New Post-secular Political Space\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23269995.2018.1511340\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultivating New Post-secular Political Space","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23269995.2018.1511340","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要这是对苏·米切尔和弗朗西斯科·j·艾罗亚-奥罗萨“爱你的敌人”的回应。后者试图通过对话范式探索利他行为的自我超越潜力。它不仅开启了对利他主义这一主题的新讨论,而且推动了对巴赫金主义美学的新讨论。为了延续这种前进势头,我们建议采用一种更细致入微的方法来将“研究人员”置于应用方法矩阵中。同样,我们也提倡将神学研究中经常使用的研究工具综合到上述方法论矩阵中。这是对Mitchell, Sue和Eiroa-Orosa, Francisco J. 2018的回复。“爱你的敌人?价值动机利他主义自我超越的美学话语分析全球话语https://doi.org/10.1080/23269995.2018.1511766
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Carving a dialogical epistemology for investigating altruism: A reply to Mitchell and Eiroa–Orosa
ABSTRACTThis is a reply to Sue Mitchell and Francisco J. Eiroa-Orosa’s ‘Love your enemy.’ The latter seeks to explore the self-transcending potential of altruistic behaviour through a dialogical paradigm. It not only initiates fresh discussion on the subject of altruism, but also advances new discussion on Bakhtinian aesthetics. For the continuation of this forward momentum, we suggest a more nuanced approach to the placement of the ‘researcher’ within the applied methodological matrix. Similarly, we also advocate for the synthesising of research tools, often appropriated by theological studies, into said methodological matrix.This is a reply to:Mitchell, Sue and Eiroa-Orosa, Francisco J. 2018. “Love your enemy? An aesthetic discourse analysis of self-transcendence in values-motivated altruism.” Global Discourse https://doi.org/10.1080/23269995.2018.1511766
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信