选择评估措施

C. A. Minton, A. S. Lenz
{"title":"选择评估措施","authors":"C. A. Minton, A. S. Lenz","doi":"10.4324/9781315108933-15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Direct versus Indirect Measures of Assessment Direct measures of assessment require students to represent, produce or demonstrate their learning. Standardized instruments, student portfolios, capstone projects, student performances, case studies, embedded assessments and oral exams all provide direct evidence of student learning. Indirect measures capture information about students’ perceptions about their learning experiences and attitudes towards the learning process. Informal observations of student behavior, focus groups, alumni surveys, self-reports (i.e., NSSE), curriculum and syllabi analysis, exit interviews, and evaluation of retention rates are some examples. The difference between direct and indirect measures of student learning has taken on new importance as accrediting agencies such as WASC have required the use of direct measures to be the primary source of evidence. Indirect measures may serve only as supporting evidence. (See table on the following page.)","PeriodicalId":197854,"journal":{"name":"Practical Approaches to Applied Research and Program Evaluation for Helping Professionals","volume":"289 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Selecting Assessment Measures\",\"authors\":\"C. A. Minton, A. S. Lenz\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9781315108933-15\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Direct versus Indirect Measures of Assessment Direct measures of assessment require students to represent, produce or demonstrate their learning. Standardized instruments, student portfolios, capstone projects, student performances, case studies, embedded assessments and oral exams all provide direct evidence of student learning. Indirect measures capture information about students’ perceptions about their learning experiences and attitudes towards the learning process. Informal observations of student behavior, focus groups, alumni surveys, self-reports (i.e., NSSE), curriculum and syllabi analysis, exit interviews, and evaluation of retention rates are some examples. The difference between direct and indirect measures of student learning has taken on new importance as accrediting agencies such as WASC have required the use of direct measures to be the primary source of evidence. Indirect measures may serve only as supporting evidence. (See table on the following page.)\",\"PeriodicalId\":197854,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Practical Approaches to Applied Research and Program Evaluation for Helping Professionals\",\"volume\":\"289 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Practical Approaches to Applied Research and Program Evaluation for Helping Professionals\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315108933-15\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practical Approaches to Applied Research and Program Evaluation for Helping Professionals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315108933-15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

直接评价方法与间接评价方法直接评价方法要求学生陈述、展示或展示他们的学习情况。标准化工具、学生作品集、顶点项目、学生表现、案例研究、嵌入式评估和口试都是学生学习的直接证据。间接测量获取有关学生对其学习经历的看法和对学习过程的态度的信息。学生行为的非正式观察、焦点小组、校友调查、自我报告(即NSSE)、课程和教学大纲分析、离职面谈和留校率评估都是一些例子。随着WASC等认证机构要求将直接衡量标准作为主要证据来源,学生学习的直接衡量标准和间接衡量标准之间的区别变得更加重要。间接措施只能作为辅助证据。(见下表)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Selecting Assessment Measures
Direct versus Indirect Measures of Assessment Direct measures of assessment require students to represent, produce or demonstrate their learning. Standardized instruments, student portfolios, capstone projects, student performances, case studies, embedded assessments and oral exams all provide direct evidence of student learning. Indirect measures capture information about students’ perceptions about their learning experiences and attitudes towards the learning process. Informal observations of student behavior, focus groups, alumni surveys, self-reports (i.e., NSSE), curriculum and syllabi analysis, exit interviews, and evaluation of retention rates are some examples. The difference between direct and indirect measures of student learning has taken on new importance as accrediting agencies such as WASC have required the use of direct measures to be the primary source of evidence. Indirect measures may serve only as supporting evidence. (See table on the following page.)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信