比较II类正畸患者有和没有做过正畸手术的颞下颌紊乱的患病率

M. Najafian, Susan Sadeghian, Eilinaz Ehrami, Nasim Esnaashari
{"title":"比较II类正畸患者有和没有做过正畸手术的颞下颌紊乱的患病率","authors":"M. Najafian, Susan Sadeghian, Eilinaz Ehrami, Nasim Esnaashari","doi":"10.18502/ijds.v17i4.8643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Most orthodontists believe that orthodontic treatment does not cause TMD (Temporomandibular disorder), although some disagree with this. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of symptoms of temporomandibular joint disorders in class II skeletal patients in three groups with a history of orthodontic treatment, orthosurgery and no treatment \nMaterials and Methods: In this descriptive-analytical study, 99 adult skeletal patients of class II referred to the orthodontic department of Khorasgan in 2020 were selected. The prevalence of TMD was assessed in three subgroups: recipient of orthodontic treatment without orthosurgery, recipient of orthodontic treatment with orthosurgery treatment, and not receiving orthodontic treatment. Anamnestic and Dysfunction indices were assessed using Helkimo index and questionnaire. Data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Chi-square and Fisher's exact test (p value < 0.05). \nResults: There was no significant difference in the severity and prevalence of TMD in adults with class II malocclusion among the three groups when comparing the anamnestic index and dysfunction index among patients with orthodontic treatment, orthosurgery and without treatment (p value < 0.05). In the examination of TMD in adults with class II malocclusion div1 and div2 among the three groups, there was no significant difference among patients with orthodontic treatment, orthosurgery and without treatment when compared with the anamnestic index and dysfunction index (p value < 0.05). \nConclusion: Severity and prevalence of TMD in adults with Class II malocclusion were no different in the three groups.","PeriodicalId":221865,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Isfahan Dental School","volume":"88 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Compare the Prevalence of Temporomandibular Disorders in Class II Orthodontic Patients with and without Orthosurgery\",\"authors\":\"M. Najafian, Susan Sadeghian, Eilinaz Ehrami, Nasim Esnaashari\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/ijds.v17i4.8643\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Most orthodontists believe that orthodontic treatment does not cause TMD (Temporomandibular disorder), although some disagree with this. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of symptoms of temporomandibular joint disorders in class II skeletal patients in three groups with a history of orthodontic treatment, orthosurgery and no treatment \\nMaterials and Methods: In this descriptive-analytical study, 99 adult skeletal patients of class II referred to the orthodontic department of Khorasgan in 2020 were selected. The prevalence of TMD was assessed in three subgroups: recipient of orthodontic treatment without orthosurgery, recipient of orthodontic treatment with orthosurgery treatment, and not receiving orthodontic treatment. Anamnestic and Dysfunction indices were assessed using Helkimo index and questionnaire. Data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Chi-square and Fisher's exact test (p value < 0.05). \\nResults: There was no significant difference in the severity and prevalence of TMD in adults with class II malocclusion among the three groups when comparing the anamnestic index and dysfunction index among patients with orthodontic treatment, orthosurgery and without treatment (p value < 0.05). In the examination of TMD in adults with class II malocclusion div1 and div2 among the three groups, there was no significant difference among patients with orthodontic treatment, orthosurgery and without treatment when compared with the anamnestic index and dysfunction index (p value < 0.05). \\nConclusion: Severity and prevalence of TMD in adults with Class II malocclusion were no different in the three groups.\",\"PeriodicalId\":221865,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Isfahan Dental School\",\"volume\":\"88 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Isfahan Dental School\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/ijds.v17i4.8643\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Isfahan Dental School","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/ijds.v17i4.8643","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:大多数正畸医生认为正畸治疗不会导致颞下颌紊乱(Temporomandibular disorder,颞下颌紊乱),尽管也有一些人不同意这一观点。本研究的目的是评估三组有正畸治疗史、正畸手术史和未治疗史的II类骨骼患者中颞下颌关节疾病症状的患病率。材料和方法:本描述性分析研究选择2020年在霍拉斯干正畸科转诊的II类成人骨骼患者99例。TMD的患病率分为三个亚组:接受正畸治疗而不接受正畸手术的患者、接受正畸治疗而不接受正畸治疗的患者和未接受正畸治疗的患者。采用Helkimo指数和问卷调查法评价痴呆和功能障碍指标。数据采用Kruskal-Wallis、卡方检验和Fisher精确检验(p值< 0.05)。结果:正畸治疗组、正畸手术组和未治疗组患者的记忆指数和功能障碍指数比较,三组成人ⅱ类错牙合患者TMD的严重程度和患病率差异无统计学意义(p值< 0.05)。在三组成人ⅱ类错牙合div1、div2的TMD检查中,正畸治疗组、正畸手术组和未治疗组患者的遗忘指数、功能障碍指数比较,差异均无统计学意义(p值< 0.05)。结论:三组成人ⅱ类错牙合患者TMD的严重程度和患病率无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Compare the Prevalence of Temporomandibular Disorders in Class II Orthodontic Patients with and without Orthosurgery
Introduction: Most orthodontists believe that orthodontic treatment does not cause TMD (Temporomandibular disorder), although some disagree with this. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of symptoms of temporomandibular joint disorders in class II skeletal patients in three groups with a history of orthodontic treatment, orthosurgery and no treatment Materials and Methods: In this descriptive-analytical study, 99 adult skeletal patients of class II referred to the orthodontic department of Khorasgan in 2020 were selected. The prevalence of TMD was assessed in three subgroups: recipient of orthodontic treatment without orthosurgery, recipient of orthodontic treatment with orthosurgery treatment, and not receiving orthodontic treatment. Anamnestic and Dysfunction indices were assessed using Helkimo index and questionnaire. Data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Chi-square and Fisher's exact test (p value < 0.05). Results: There was no significant difference in the severity and prevalence of TMD in adults with class II malocclusion among the three groups when comparing the anamnestic index and dysfunction index among patients with orthodontic treatment, orthosurgery and without treatment (p value < 0.05). In the examination of TMD in adults with class II malocclusion div1 and div2 among the three groups, there was no significant difference among patients with orthodontic treatment, orthosurgery and without treatment when compared with the anamnestic index and dysfunction index (p value < 0.05). Conclusion: Severity and prevalence of TMD in adults with Class II malocclusion were no different in the three groups.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信