{"title":"Tajzi`ah al-Quran: Kajian Terhadap Periwayatan al-Dani, al-Sakhawi dan al-Safaqusi serta Amalan Semasa Percetakan Mushaf","authors":"Abd Muhaimin Ahmad","doi":"10.33102/jmqs.v15i2.195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The tajzi`ah (fragmentation) plays a role of quantifying the amount of reading and memorizing the Quran by juz (part or division). In classical and modern writings of Muslim scholars, there are different opinions about tajzi`ah the Quran that it has effect to printing of the Quran. Thus, this study will analyze some classical and medieval Quranic scholars’ opinions in tajzi`ah the Quran with particular reference to al-Bayan fi `Addi Ayi al-Quran of al-Dani, Jamal al-Qurra 'wa Kamal al-Iqra' of al- Sakhawi and Ghaith al-Naf 'fi al-Qira`at al-Sab' of al-Safaqusi. Subsequenly, their opinions will be compared with the current practice of the tajzi'ah in the Mushaf al-Quran printed by Mujamma’ Malik al-Fahd in Medina. This qualitative study was conducted using content analysis methods through descriptive and comparative analysis of texts in accomodating scholars’ opinions in tajzi`ah of the Quran along with the current practices in printed copy of the Quran. In this comparative analysis, most of the tajzi'ah (20 juz’) of the Mushaf Medina in accordance with those three scholars’ tajzi’ah. However, some of these tajzi’ah were not agreed by them, and the tajzi`ah of Mushaf Medina was only in agreement with one of them (9 juz’). The study also found that one tajzi`ah has not been agreed by these three scholars as the printed Mushaf Medina was not in similarity by every possible means.","PeriodicalId":276672,"journal":{"name":"Maʿālim al-Qurʾān wa al-Sunnah","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maʿālim al-Qurʾān wa al-Sunnah","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33102/jmqs.v15i2.195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
tajzi 'ah(碎片)的作用是通过juz(部分或部分)来量化阅读和记忆古兰经的数量。在穆斯林学者的古典和现代著作中,对《古兰经》的tajzi 'ah对《古兰经》印刷的影响有不同的看法。因此,本研究将分析一些古典和中世纪古兰经学者对古兰经tajzi ' ah的看法,特别参考al- dani的al- bayan fi ' Addi Ayi al- qurra 'wa Kamal al- iqra ', al- Sakhawi的Jamal - qurra 'wa Kamal - iqra '和al- safaqui的Ghaith al- naf 'fi al- qira ' at al- sab '。随后,他们的意见将与麦地那的穆罕默德·马利克·法赫德(Mujamma ' Malik al-Fahd)出版的《穆沙夫·古兰经》(Mushaf al-Quran)中tajzi'ah的现行做法进行比较。本定性研究采用内容分析的方法,通过对文本的描述和比较分析,以适应学者对古兰经的tajzi ' ah的看法以及古兰经印刷本的现行做法。在这一比较分析中,大部分的tajzi'ah (20 juz ')的穆沙夫麦地那符合那三位学者的tajzi'ah。然而,其中一些tajzi ' s不被他们同意,而穆沙夫麦地那的tajzi ' s只与他们中的一个(9 juz ')一致。这项研究还发现,这三位学者没有同意一个tajzi 'ah,因为印刷的Mushaf Medina在所有可能的情况下都不相似。
Tajzi`ah al-Quran: Kajian Terhadap Periwayatan al-Dani, al-Sakhawi dan al-Safaqusi serta Amalan Semasa Percetakan Mushaf
The tajzi`ah (fragmentation) plays a role of quantifying the amount of reading and memorizing the Quran by juz (part or division). In classical and modern writings of Muslim scholars, there are different opinions about tajzi`ah the Quran that it has effect to printing of the Quran. Thus, this study will analyze some classical and medieval Quranic scholars’ opinions in tajzi`ah the Quran with particular reference to al-Bayan fi `Addi Ayi al-Quran of al-Dani, Jamal al-Qurra 'wa Kamal al-Iqra' of al- Sakhawi and Ghaith al-Naf 'fi al-Qira`at al-Sab' of al-Safaqusi. Subsequenly, their opinions will be compared with the current practice of the tajzi'ah in the Mushaf al-Quran printed by Mujamma’ Malik al-Fahd in Medina. This qualitative study was conducted using content analysis methods through descriptive and comparative analysis of texts in accomodating scholars’ opinions in tajzi`ah of the Quran along with the current practices in printed copy of the Quran. In this comparative analysis, most of the tajzi'ah (20 juz’) of the Mushaf Medina in accordance with those three scholars’ tajzi’ah. However, some of these tajzi’ah were not agreed by them, and the tajzi`ah of Mushaf Medina was only in agreement with one of them (9 juz’). The study also found that one tajzi`ah has not been agreed by these three scholars as the printed Mushaf Medina was not in similarity by every possible means.