{"title":"阿罗不可能定理的一种分布式组合拓扑方法","authors":"S. Rajsbaum, A. Raventós-Pujol","doi":"10.1145/3519270.3538433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Baryshnikov presented a remarkable algebraic topology proof of Arrow's impossibility theorem trying to understand the underlying reason behind the numerous proofs of this fundamental result of social choice theory. We present here a novel combinatorial topology approach that does not use advanced mathematics, while giving a geometric intuition of the impossibility. This exposes a remarkable connection with distributed computing techniques. We study in detail the case of two voters, n=2, and three alternatives, |X|=3, and show that Arrow's impossibility is closely related to the index lemma. Also, we study the domain restrictions that avoid the impossibility. Finally, we explain why the case of n=2 and |X|=3 is where this interesting geometry happens, by giving a simple proof that this case implies Arrow's impossibility for any |X| ≥ 3 and any finite n ≥ 2.","PeriodicalId":182444,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Distributed Combinatorial Topology Approach to Arrow's Impossibility Theorem\",\"authors\":\"S. Rajsbaum, A. Raventós-Pujol\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3519270.3538433\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Baryshnikov presented a remarkable algebraic topology proof of Arrow's impossibility theorem trying to understand the underlying reason behind the numerous proofs of this fundamental result of social choice theory. We present here a novel combinatorial topology approach that does not use advanced mathematics, while giving a geometric intuition of the impossibility. This exposes a remarkable connection with distributed computing techniques. We study in detail the case of two voters, n=2, and three alternatives, |X|=3, and show that Arrow's impossibility is closely related to the index lemma. Also, we study the domain restrictions that avoid the impossibility. Finally, we explain why the case of n=2 and |X|=3 is where this interesting geometry happens, by giving a simple proof that this case implies Arrow's impossibility for any |X| ≥ 3 and any finite n ≥ 2.\",\"PeriodicalId\":182444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3519270.3538433\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3519270.3538433","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Distributed Combinatorial Topology Approach to Arrow's Impossibility Theorem
Baryshnikov presented a remarkable algebraic topology proof of Arrow's impossibility theorem trying to understand the underlying reason behind the numerous proofs of this fundamental result of social choice theory. We present here a novel combinatorial topology approach that does not use advanced mathematics, while giving a geometric intuition of the impossibility. This exposes a remarkable connection with distributed computing techniques. We study in detail the case of two voters, n=2, and three alternatives, |X|=3, and show that Arrow's impossibility is closely related to the index lemma. Also, we study the domain restrictions that avoid the impossibility. Finally, we explain why the case of n=2 and |X|=3 is where this interesting geometry happens, by giving a simple proof that this case implies Arrow's impossibility for any |X| ≥ 3 and any finite n ≥ 2.