去极化异常与轻度射血分数降低的关系

Maria Gordeeva, I. Serdiukova, A. Krasichkov, E. Parmon
{"title":"去极化异常与轻度射血分数降低的关系","authors":"Maria Gordeeva, I. Serdiukova, A. Krasichkov, E. Parmon","doi":"10.22489/CinC.2022.204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the study was to investigate the relationship between a left ventricular ejection fraction <tex>$(EF)$</tex> and <tex>$ECG$</tex> patterns associated with structural changes of the myocardium (pathological <tex>$Q$</tex> wave, fragmentated <tex>$QRS$</tex> complex <tex>$(fQRS)$</tex>, early repolarization pattern <tex>$(ERP). The$</tex> study included 148. According to the level of <tex>$EF$</tex>, patients were divided into three groups: Group 1 - patients with low <tex>$EF(lEF)$</tex> (less than 40%), group 2 - patients with mildly reduced <tex>$EF(mrEF)$</tex> (40-49%); group 3 - patients with preserved <tex>$EF(pEF)$</tex> (more than 50%). In the 1st group <tex>$(EF)fQRS$</tex> was registered in 16 (51.6%) patients, in the mrEF - in 16 (18.2%). Pathological <tex>$Q$</tex> wave was detected in <tex>$lEF$</tex> in 20 (65%), in <tex>$mrEF$</tex> in 10 (35%), 15 (18%), in <tex>$pEF$</tex> in 15 (18%). The <tex>$fQRS$</tex> has been found to be more important in identifying patients with <tex>$mrEF$</tex>, In <tex>$lEF$</tex> in 2 (6.5%) patients, in mrEF - in 2 (6.9%), in pEF - in 11 (12.5%). There was no relationship between <tex>$ERP$</tex> and <tex>$EF$</tex>.","PeriodicalId":117840,"journal":{"name":"2022 Computing in Cardiology (CinC)","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationship Between ECG-pattern of Depolarization Abnormalities and an Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction\",\"authors\":\"Maria Gordeeva, I. Serdiukova, A. Krasichkov, E. Parmon\",\"doi\":\"10.22489/CinC.2022.204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of the study was to investigate the relationship between a left ventricular ejection fraction <tex>$(EF)$</tex> and <tex>$ECG$</tex> patterns associated with structural changes of the myocardium (pathological <tex>$Q$</tex> wave, fragmentated <tex>$QRS$</tex> complex <tex>$(fQRS)$</tex>, early repolarization pattern <tex>$(ERP). The$</tex> study included 148. According to the level of <tex>$EF$</tex>, patients were divided into three groups: Group 1 - patients with low <tex>$EF(lEF)$</tex> (less than 40%), group 2 - patients with mildly reduced <tex>$EF(mrEF)$</tex> (40-49%); group 3 - patients with preserved <tex>$EF(pEF)$</tex> (more than 50%). In the 1st group <tex>$(EF)fQRS$</tex> was registered in 16 (51.6%) patients, in the mrEF - in 16 (18.2%). Pathological <tex>$Q$</tex> wave was detected in <tex>$lEF$</tex> in 20 (65%), in <tex>$mrEF$</tex> in 10 (35%), 15 (18%), in <tex>$pEF$</tex> in 15 (18%). The <tex>$fQRS$</tex> has been found to be more important in identifying patients with <tex>$mrEF$</tex>, In <tex>$lEF$</tex> in 2 (6.5%) patients, in mrEF - in 2 (6.9%), in pEF - in 11 (12.5%). There was no relationship between <tex>$ERP$</tex> and <tex>$EF$</tex>.\",\"PeriodicalId\":117840,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 Computing in Cardiology (CinC)\",\"volume\":\"80 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 Computing in Cardiology (CinC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22489/CinC.2022.204\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 Computing in Cardiology (CinC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22489/CinC.2022.204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是探讨左心室射血分数(EF)与心肌结构改变相关的心电图模式(病理性Q波、碎片性QRS、复杂型fQRS、早期复极模式ERP)之间的关系。这项耗资1美元的研究包括148人。根据$EF$的水平将患者分为三组:1组-低$EF(lEF)$(小于40%),2组- $EF轻度降低(mrEF)$ (40-49%);3组-保留EF(pEF)$的患者(大于50%)。在第一组中,16例(51.6%)患者登记为fQRS$,在mrEF - In组中16例(18.2%)登记为fQRS$。病理Q波出现在lEF$ 20例(65%),mrEF$ 10例(35%),15例(18%),pEF$ 15例(18%)。fQRS在识别mrEF患者中更为重要,在2例(6.5%)患者中更重要,在2例(6.9%)患者中更重要,在11例(12.5%)患者中更重要。$ERP$与$EF$之间没有关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Relationship Between ECG-pattern of Depolarization Abnormalities and an Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction
The aim of the study was to investigate the relationship between a left ventricular ejection fraction $(EF)$ and $ECG$ patterns associated with structural changes of the myocardium (pathological $Q$ wave, fragmentated $QRS$ complex $(fQRS)$, early repolarization pattern $(ERP). The$ study included 148. According to the level of $EF$, patients were divided into three groups: Group 1 - patients with low $EF(lEF)$ (less than 40%), group 2 - patients with mildly reduced $EF(mrEF)$ (40-49%); group 3 - patients with preserved $EF(pEF)$ (more than 50%). In the 1st group $(EF)fQRS$ was registered in 16 (51.6%) patients, in the mrEF - in 16 (18.2%). Pathological $Q$ wave was detected in $lEF$ in 20 (65%), in $mrEF$ in 10 (35%), 15 (18%), in $pEF$ in 15 (18%). The $fQRS$ has been found to be more important in identifying patients with $mrEF$, In $lEF$ in 2 (6.5%) patients, in mrEF - in 2 (6.9%), in pEF - in 11 (12.5%). There was no relationship between $ERP$ and $EF$.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信