B2B电子商务技术有先发优势吗?

G. J. Hidding, Jeffrey R. Williams
{"title":"B2B电子商务技术有先发优势吗?","authors":"G. J. Hidding, Jeffrey R. Williams","doi":"10.1109/HICSS.2003.1174387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently, \"dot-com \" startups relied on the well-known concept of \"first-mover advantage\" to justify huge marketing expenses and large financial losses. The idea was that once the firm had gathered customers, it would keep those customers because it had a first-mover advantage. But was that assumption valid? We analyzed whether first-mover advantage actually occurred in 19 information technology product categories that enable B2B ecommerce (and 6 that enable B2C ecommerce). Consistent with earlier studies in other industries, we found that, in half the product categories, the current leaders were among the first three entrants. However, we identified an important refinement. In at least 80% of the product categories in our sample, the first movers lost their initial advantage. This paper presents detailed results, including pioneer lead times and leader lag. It also presents implications for strategic management practitioners, as well as suggestions for further research.","PeriodicalId":159242,"journal":{"name":"36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are there first-mover advantages in B2B ecommerce technologies?\",\"authors\":\"G. J. Hidding, Jeffrey R. Williams\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/HICSS.2003.1174387\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recently, \\\"dot-com \\\" startups relied on the well-known concept of \\\"first-mover advantage\\\" to justify huge marketing expenses and large financial losses. The idea was that once the firm had gathered customers, it would keep those customers because it had a first-mover advantage. But was that assumption valid? We analyzed whether first-mover advantage actually occurred in 19 information technology product categories that enable B2B ecommerce (and 6 that enable B2C ecommerce). Consistent with earlier studies in other industries, we found that, in half the product categories, the current leaders were among the first three entrants. However, we identified an important refinement. In at least 80% of the product categories in our sample, the first movers lost their initial advantage. This paper presents detailed results, including pioneer lead times and leader lag. It also presents implications for strategic management practitioners, as well as suggestions for further research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":159242,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2003.1174387\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2003.1174387","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

最近,“。com”创业公司依靠众所周知的“先发优势”概念来证明巨额营销费用和巨额财务损失是合理的。这个想法是,一旦公司聚集了客户,它就会留住这些客户,因为它有先发优势。但这个假设成立吗?我们分析了实现B2B电子商务的19个信息技术产品类别(以及6个实现B2C电子商务的信息技术产品类别)是否确实存在先发优势。与其他行业早期的研究一致,我们发现,在一半的产品类别中,目前的领导者都是前三名进入者。然而,我们确定了一个重要的改进。在我们的样本中,至少80%的产品类别中,先行者失去了最初的优势。本文给出了详细的结果,包括先锋交货时间和领先者滞后。本文也对战略管理从业者提出了启示,并对进一步的研究提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Are there first-mover advantages in B2B ecommerce technologies?
Recently, "dot-com " startups relied on the well-known concept of "first-mover advantage" to justify huge marketing expenses and large financial losses. The idea was that once the firm had gathered customers, it would keep those customers because it had a first-mover advantage. But was that assumption valid? We analyzed whether first-mover advantage actually occurred in 19 information technology product categories that enable B2B ecommerce (and 6 that enable B2C ecommerce). Consistent with earlier studies in other industries, we found that, in half the product categories, the current leaders were among the first three entrants. However, we identified an important refinement. In at least 80% of the product categories in our sample, the first movers lost their initial advantage. This paper presents detailed results, including pioneer lead times and leader lag. It also presents implications for strategic management practitioners, as well as suggestions for further research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信