利益相关者和同行评审在OTA中的作用

1997 International Symposium on Technology and Society Technology and Society at a Time of Sweeping Change. Proceedings Pub Date : 1997-06-20 DOI:10.1109/ISTAS.1997.658878

C. Andrews

{"title":"利益相关者和同行评审在OTA中的作用","authors":"C. Andrews","doi":"10.1109/ISTAS.1997.658878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper shares preliminary findings of a survey of participants in studies by the recently disbanded U.S. Congressional Office of Technology Assessment. The focus of the survey is on efficacy of the review-intensive study process used at that agency. The findings confirm the value of this process, but with important caveats, and suggest useful strategies for performing \"communicative\" analysis.","PeriodicalId":226458,"journal":{"name":"1997 International Symposium on Technology and Society Technology and Society at a Time of Sweeping Change. Proceedings","volume":"34 20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The roles of stakeholder- and peer-review at the OTA\",\"authors\":\"C. Andrews\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISTAS.1997.658878\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper shares preliminary findings of a survey of participants in studies by the recently disbanded U.S. Congressional Office of Technology Assessment. The focus of the survey is on efficacy of the review-intensive study process used at that agency. The findings confirm the value of this process, but with important caveats, and suggest useful strategies for performing \\\"communicative\\\" analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":226458,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"1997 International Symposium on Technology and Society Technology and Society at a Time of Sweeping Change. Proceedings\",\"volume\":\"34 20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"1997 International Symposium on Technology and Society Technology and Society at a Time of Sweeping Change. Proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTAS.1997.658878\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"1997 International Symposium on Technology and Society Technology and Society at a Time of Sweeping Change. Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTAS.1997.658878","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇论文分享了最近被解散的美国国会技术评估办公室对研究参与者进行的一项调查的初步结果。调查的重点是该机构采用的密集审查研究程序的效力。研究结果证实了这一过程的价值，但有重要的警告，并提出了执行“沟通”分析的有用策略。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The roles of stakeholder- and peer-review at the OTA

The paper shares preliminary findings of a survey of participants in studies by the recently disbanded U.S. Congressional Office of Technology Assessment. The focus of the survey is on efficacy of the review-intensive study process used at that agency. The findings confirm the value of this process, but with important caveats, and suggest useful strategies for performing "communicative" analysis.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

1997 International Symposium on Technology and Society Technology and Society at a Time of Sweeping Change. Proceedings

自引率

0.00%

发文量