杠杆试验在前交叉韧带损伤诊断中的辅助作用

Pramod Valsalam, Ibad Sha I, A. Edwin
{"title":"杠杆试验在前交叉韧带损伤诊断中的辅助作用","authors":"Pramod Valsalam, Ibad Sha I, A. Edwin","doi":"10.32598/JROSJ.7.3.702.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The diagnosis of ACL tear is aided by clinical tests and imaging evaluation with MRI. The main clinical tests include Lachman, Anterior Drawer  and Pivot shift test. A newer clinical test called lever test was proposed recently with higher sensitivity compared to traditional tests. Objectives: To investigate the sensitivity, specificity and other statistical parameters of newly proposed  lever test for ACL injury along with other established tests, Lachman test, Anterior Drawer test and Pivot Shift test. Methods: 242 patients consecutive patients with a complaint of knee pain  were included in the study over a period of 4 years between ages of 18 to 50 years. They were evaluated with clinical tests Lever test, Lachman test, Anterior Drawer test and Pivot Shift test without anaesthesia and under anaesthesia. Results of diagnostic arthroscopy was taken as gold standard. Results: A total of 242 consecutive subjects were eligible during the study period, of which 182 were males while the remaining 60 were females. Compared to gold standard, without anaesthesia the lever test had a sensitivity of 85.57%, specificity of 25.00%, PPV of 82.18%, NPV of 30.00%, and accuracy of 73.55%. Similarly regarding other tests the sensitivity and specificity without anaesthesia were, Lachman test sensitivity of 93.81%, specificity of 20.83%, PPV of 82.73%, NPV of 45.45%, and accuracy of 79.34%, Anterior Drawer test sensitivity of 80.41%, specificity of 33.33%, PPV of 82.98%, NPV of 29.63%, and accuracy of 71.07%, Pivot Shift test sensitivity of 40.21%, specificity of 91.67%, PPV of 80.17%, NPV of 95.12%, and accuracy of 50.41%.  The results under anaesthesia compared to arthroscopy findings were Lever Test Lachman Anterior Drawer Pivot Shift Accuracy, % 77.69, 79.34, 71.90, 80.99 Sensitivity, % 91.75, 98.97, 93.81, 98.97, Specificity, % 20.83, 36.33, 20.83, 58.33 PPV, % 82.41, 81.36, 58.33, 87.95 NPV, % 38.46, 66.67, 39, 36.84. Conclusion:  The lever test needs to be studied extensively considering multiple variables like correlation with BMI, position of wrist, partial injuries and also interobserver variations before it gets standardized into routine examination.","PeriodicalId":286829,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Orthopedic Science","volume":"603 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lever Test: Role of Its Assistance in Diagnosis of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury\",\"authors\":\"Pramod Valsalam, Ibad Sha I, A. Edwin\",\"doi\":\"10.32598/JROSJ.7.3.702.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The diagnosis of ACL tear is aided by clinical tests and imaging evaluation with MRI. The main clinical tests include Lachman, Anterior Drawer  and Pivot shift test. A newer clinical test called lever test was proposed recently with higher sensitivity compared to traditional tests. Objectives: To investigate the sensitivity, specificity and other statistical parameters of newly proposed  lever test for ACL injury along with other established tests, Lachman test, Anterior Drawer test and Pivot Shift test. Methods: 242 patients consecutive patients with a complaint of knee pain  were included in the study over a period of 4 years between ages of 18 to 50 years. They were evaluated with clinical tests Lever test, Lachman test, Anterior Drawer test and Pivot Shift test without anaesthesia and under anaesthesia. Results of diagnostic arthroscopy was taken as gold standard. Results: A total of 242 consecutive subjects were eligible during the study period, of which 182 were males while the remaining 60 were females. Compared to gold standard, without anaesthesia the lever test had a sensitivity of 85.57%, specificity of 25.00%, PPV of 82.18%, NPV of 30.00%, and accuracy of 73.55%. Similarly regarding other tests the sensitivity and specificity without anaesthesia were, Lachman test sensitivity of 93.81%, specificity of 20.83%, PPV of 82.73%, NPV of 45.45%, and accuracy of 79.34%, Anterior Drawer test sensitivity of 80.41%, specificity of 33.33%, PPV of 82.98%, NPV of 29.63%, and accuracy of 71.07%, Pivot Shift test sensitivity of 40.21%, specificity of 91.67%, PPV of 80.17%, NPV of 95.12%, and accuracy of 50.41%.  The results under anaesthesia compared to arthroscopy findings were Lever Test Lachman Anterior Drawer Pivot Shift Accuracy, % 77.69, 79.34, 71.90, 80.99 Sensitivity, % 91.75, 98.97, 93.81, 98.97, Specificity, % 20.83, 36.33, 20.83, 58.33 PPV, % 82.41, 81.36, 58.33, 87.95 NPV, % 38.46, 66.67, 39, 36.84. Conclusion:  The lever test needs to be studied extensively considering multiple variables like correlation with BMI, position of wrist, partial injuries and also interobserver variations before it gets standardized into routine examination.\",\"PeriodicalId\":286829,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Research in Orthopedic Science\",\"volume\":\"603 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Research in Orthopedic Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32598/JROSJ.7.3.702.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Orthopedic Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/JROSJ.7.3.702.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:前交叉韧带撕裂的诊断需要临床检查和MRI影像学评估。临床试验主要有拉赫曼试验、前抽屉试验和枢轴移位试验。最近提出了一种新的临床试验,称为杠杆试验,与传统试验相比,灵敏度更高。目的:探讨新提出的杠杆试验对前交叉韧带损伤的敏感性、特异性及其他统计参数,并与现有的拉赫曼试验、前抽屉试验和Pivot Shift试验进行比较。方法:242例连续抱怨膝关节疼痛的患者被纳入研究,时间跨度为4年,年龄在18至50岁之间。采用杠杆试验、拉赫曼试验、前抽屉试验和枢轴移位试验对两组患者进行临床评价。以关节镜诊断结果为金标准。结果:研究期间共纳入242例连续受试者,其中男性182例,女性60例。与金标准相比,未麻醉时杠杆试验的敏感性为85.57%,特异性为25.00%,PPV为82.18%,NPV为30.00%,准确率为73.55%。其他试验在不麻醉情况下的敏感性和特异性分别为:拉赫曼试验敏感性93.81%、特异性20.83%、PPV 82.73%、NPV 45.45%、准确性79.34%;前抽屉试验敏感性80.41%、特异性33.33%、PPV 82.98%、NPV 29.63%、准确性71.07%;Pivot Shift试验敏感性40.21%、特异性91.67%、PPV 80.17%、NPV 95.12%、准确性50.41%。麻醉下结果与关节镜检查结果比较:杠杆试验Lachman前抽屉枢轴移位准确率为% 77.69、79.34、71.90、80.99,灵敏度为% 91.75、98.97、93.81、98.97,特异性为% 20.83、36.33、20.83、58.33 PPV, % 82.41、81.36、58.33、87.95 NPV, % 38.46、66.67、39、36.84。结论:杠杆试验在标准化为常规检查前,需要广泛研究,考虑与BMI的相关性、腕关节位置、局部损伤及观察者间的差异等多变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lever Test: Role of Its Assistance in Diagnosis of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury
Background: The diagnosis of ACL tear is aided by clinical tests and imaging evaluation with MRI. The main clinical tests include Lachman, Anterior Drawer  and Pivot shift test. A newer clinical test called lever test was proposed recently with higher sensitivity compared to traditional tests. Objectives: To investigate the sensitivity, specificity and other statistical parameters of newly proposed  lever test for ACL injury along with other established tests, Lachman test, Anterior Drawer test and Pivot Shift test. Methods: 242 patients consecutive patients with a complaint of knee pain  were included in the study over a period of 4 years between ages of 18 to 50 years. They were evaluated with clinical tests Lever test, Lachman test, Anterior Drawer test and Pivot Shift test without anaesthesia and under anaesthesia. Results of diagnostic arthroscopy was taken as gold standard. Results: A total of 242 consecutive subjects were eligible during the study period, of which 182 were males while the remaining 60 were females. Compared to gold standard, without anaesthesia the lever test had a sensitivity of 85.57%, specificity of 25.00%, PPV of 82.18%, NPV of 30.00%, and accuracy of 73.55%. Similarly regarding other tests the sensitivity and specificity without anaesthesia were, Lachman test sensitivity of 93.81%, specificity of 20.83%, PPV of 82.73%, NPV of 45.45%, and accuracy of 79.34%, Anterior Drawer test sensitivity of 80.41%, specificity of 33.33%, PPV of 82.98%, NPV of 29.63%, and accuracy of 71.07%, Pivot Shift test sensitivity of 40.21%, specificity of 91.67%, PPV of 80.17%, NPV of 95.12%, and accuracy of 50.41%.  The results under anaesthesia compared to arthroscopy findings were Lever Test Lachman Anterior Drawer Pivot Shift Accuracy, % 77.69, 79.34, 71.90, 80.99 Sensitivity, % 91.75, 98.97, 93.81, 98.97, Specificity, % 20.83, 36.33, 20.83, 58.33 PPV, % 82.41, 81.36, 58.33, 87.95 NPV, % 38.46, 66.67, 39, 36.84. Conclusion:  The lever test needs to be studied extensively considering multiple variables like correlation with BMI, position of wrist, partial injuries and also interobserver variations before it gets standardized into routine examination.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信