自适应安全活动选择中的标准优先排序,使用分析网络过程的ASAS模型,ANP

Mazni Mohamed Jakeri, M. Hassan
{"title":"自适应安全活动选择中的标准优先排序,使用分析网络过程的ASAS模型,ANP","authors":"Mazni Mohamed Jakeri, M. Hassan","doi":"10.1109/AINS47559.2019.8968709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Organizations have proposed the best practices of security activities in software development life cycle as guidance for development team. However, the implementation of the security activities are influenced by criteria which are interdependent to each other and dynamic. Those criteria are experience, skill and knowledge; teams workload; development team size; development timeline; and cost/budget. Therefore, the selection of security activities must be based on the priority of the criteria and adaptive. This paper addresses the adaptive security activities selection model as a multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) issue. Analytic Network Process (ANP) is proposed for weight calculation and criteria prioritization. Hypothetical examples were presented based on hard constraints faced by in-house web-based application development team in two different scenarios. The Decision Maker made the judgement by using the online ASAS model. The results show that experience, skill and knowledge get the highest priority in the first scenario while budget/ cost get the highest priority in the second scenario. These prioritization will be used as a major requirement in security activities selection.","PeriodicalId":309381,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE Conference on Application, Information and Network Security (AINS)","volume":"263 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Criteria Prioritization in Adaptive Security Activities Selection, ASAS Model using Analytic Network Process, ANP\",\"authors\":\"Mazni Mohamed Jakeri, M. Hassan\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/AINS47559.2019.8968709\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Organizations have proposed the best practices of security activities in software development life cycle as guidance for development team. However, the implementation of the security activities are influenced by criteria which are interdependent to each other and dynamic. Those criteria are experience, skill and knowledge; teams workload; development team size; development timeline; and cost/budget. Therefore, the selection of security activities must be based on the priority of the criteria and adaptive. This paper addresses the adaptive security activities selection model as a multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) issue. Analytic Network Process (ANP) is proposed for weight calculation and criteria prioritization. Hypothetical examples were presented based on hard constraints faced by in-house web-based application development team in two different scenarios. The Decision Maker made the judgement by using the online ASAS model. The results show that experience, skill and knowledge get the highest priority in the first scenario while budget/ cost get the highest priority in the second scenario. These prioritization will be used as a major requirement in security activities selection.\",\"PeriodicalId\":309381,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 IEEE Conference on Application, Information and Network Security (AINS)\",\"volume\":\"263 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 IEEE Conference on Application, Information and Network Security (AINS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/AINS47559.2019.8968709\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE Conference on Application, Information and Network Security (AINS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AINS47559.2019.8968709","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

组织已经提出了软件开发生命周期中安全活动的最佳实践,作为开发团队的指导。然而,安全活动的实施受到相互依存和动态的标准的影响。这些标准是经验、技能和知识;团队工作;开发团队规模;开发时间;和成本预算。因此,安全活动的选择必须根据优先级的标准而自适应。本文将自适应安全活动选择模型作为一个多准则决策(MCDM)问题来研究。提出了用网络分析法(ANP)计算权重和确定优先级的方法。基于内部基于web的应用程序开发团队在两种不同场景中所面临的硬约束给出了假设示例。决策者使用在线ASAS模型进行判断。结果表明,经验、技能和知识在第一种情况下优先级最高,而预算/成本在第二种情况下优先级最高。这些优先级将作为安全活动选择的主要需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Criteria Prioritization in Adaptive Security Activities Selection, ASAS Model using Analytic Network Process, ANP
Organizations have proposed the best practices of security activities in software development life cycle as guidance for development team. However, the implementation of the security activities are influenced by criteria which are interdependent to each other and dynamic. Those criteria are experience, skill and knowledge; teams workload; development team size; development timeline; and cost/budget. Therefore, the selection of security activities must be based on the priority of the criteria and adaptive. This paper addresses the adaptive security activities selection model as a multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) issue. Analytic Network Process (ANP) is proposed for weight calculation and criteria prioritization. Hypothetical examples were presented based on hard constraints faced by in-house web-based application development team in two different scenarios. The Decision Maker made the judgement by using the online ASAS model. The results show that experience, skill and knowledge get the highest priority in the first scenario while budget/ cost get the highest priority in the second scenario. These prioritization will be used as a major requirement in security activities selection.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信