迷你篮球的教学-学习-训练过程

J. Morales, Erick Godinho Silva, Cristino Julio Alves da Silva Matias, Rodrigo Aguido Reis, P. J. Greco
{"title":"迷你篮球的教学-学习-训练过程","authors":"J. Morales, Erick Godinho Silva, Cristino Julio Alves da Silva Matias, Rodrigo Aguido Reis, P. J. Greco","doi":"10.3900/fpj.8.5.349.s","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The purpose of this study was to analyze and describe the methodologies employed in the technical and tactical teaching-learningtraining (EAT) in mini-basketball. Materials and Methods: The sample consisted of 22 male students who practiced the mini-basketball category (10 to 12 years-old) and belonged to two groups (A and B) that were trained in different methods of EAT. The protocol developed by Stefanello was used to categorize and classify the training sessions. Results: In Group A, the use of situational and mixed method (named analytical-global) was predominant. In Group B, there was an emphasis on analytical method using. The calculation of χ2 confirmed significant differences between groups for conditions of tasks parameter. This parameter consists of individual foundation (χ2=14.48, p<0.05), combination of foundations (χ2=56.51, p<0.05), game complex 1 (χ2=45.75; p<0.05) and game complex 2 (χ2=45.8, p<0.05) categories. In tasks parameter there were also significant differences in the technical acquisition (χ2=23.45, p<0.05), in the technique diversification and fixation (χ2=22.5, p<0.05), in the technique application (χ2=10, p<0.05) and in the competition (χ2=46.21, p<0.05) category. Discussion: Therefore, it was observed that the use of alternative EAT methods focused on tactic improves the technical and tactical performance of basketball practitioners.","PeriodicalId":164994,"journal":{"name":"Fitness & Performance Journal","volume":"137 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Proceso de enseñanza-aprendizaje-entrenamiento en el minibaloncesto\",\"authors\":\"J. Morales, Erick Godinho Silva, Cristino Julio Alves da Silva Matias, Rodrigo Aguido Reis, P. J. Greco\",\"doi\":\"10.3900/fpj.8.5.349.s\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: The purpose of this study was to analyze and describe the methodologies employed in the technical and tactical teaching-learningtraining (EAT) in mini-basketball. Materials and Methods: The sample consisted of 22 male students who practiced the mini-basketball category (10 to 12 years-old) and belonged to two groups (A and B) that were trained in different methods of EAT. The protocol developed by Stefanello was used to categorize and classify the training sessions. Results: In Group A, the use of situational and mixed method (named analytical-global) was predominant. In Group B, there was an emphasis on analytical method using. The calculation of χ2 confirmed significant differences between groups for conditions of tasks parameter. This parameter consists of individual foundation (χ2=14.48, p<0.05), combination of foundations (χ2=56.51, p<0.05), game complex 1 (χ2=45.75; p<0.05) and game complex 2 (χ2=45.8, p<0.05) categories. In tasks parameter there were also significant differences in the technical acquisition (χ2=23.45, p<0.05), in the technique diversification and fixation (χ2=22.5, p<0.05), in the technique application (χ2=10, p<0.05) and in the competition (χ2=46.21, p<0.05) category. Discussion: Therefore, it was observed that the use of alternative EAT methods focused on tactic improves the technical and tactical performance of basketball practitioners.\",\"PeriodicalId\":164994,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fitness & Performance Journal\",\"volume\":\"137 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fitness & Performance Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3900/fpj.8.5.349.s\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fitness & Performance Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3900/fpj.8.5.349.s","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前言:本研究的目的是分析和描述在小型篮球技战术教学训练(EAT)中使用的方法。材料与方法:样本为22名10 ~ 12岁的小型篮球类男生,分为A、B两组,采用不同的EAT训练方法。Stefanello开发的协议用于对培训课程进行分类和分类。结果:在A组中,情境法和混合法(称为分析全局法)的使用占主导地位。B组强调分析方法的使用。经χ2计算,任务参数条件组间差异有统计学意义。该参数由单个基础(χ2=14.48, p<0.05)、组合基础(χ2=56.51, p<0.05)、游戏复合体1 (χ2=45.75;P <0.05)和游戏复合体2 (χ2=45.8, P <0.05)。在任务参数上,在技术习得(χ2=23.45, p<0.05)、技术多样化和固定(χ2=22.5, p<0.05)、技术应用(χ2=10, p<0.05)和竞争(χ2=46.21, p<0.05)方面也存在显著差异。讨论:因此,我们观察到,使用以战术为重点的替代EAT方法可以提高篮球练习者的技术和战术表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Proceso de enseñanza-aprendizaje-entrenamiento en el minibaloncesto
Introduction: The purpose of this study was to analyze and describe the methodologies employed in the technical and tactical teaching-learningtraining (EAT) in mini-basketball. Materials and Methods: The sample consisted of 22 male students who practiced the mini-basketball category (10 to 12 years-old) and belonged to two groups (A and B) that were trained in different methods of EAT. The protocol developed by Stefanello was used to categorize and classify the training sessions. Results: In Group A, the use of situational and mixed method (named analytical-global) was predominant. In Group B, there was an emphasis on analytical method using. The calculation of χ2 confirmed significant differences between groups for conditions of tasks parameter. This parameter consists of individual foundation (χ2=14.48, p<0.05), combination of foundations (χ2=56.51, p<0.05), game complex 1 (χ2=45.75; p<0.05) and game complex 2 (χ2=45.8, p<0.05) categories. In tasks parameter there were also significant differences in the technical acquisition (χ2=23.45, p<0.05), in the technique diversification and fixation (χ2=22.5, p<0.05), in the technique application (χ2=10, p<0.05) and in the competition (χ2=46.21, p<0.05) category. Discussion: Therefore, it was observed that the use of alternative EAT methods focused on tactic improves the technical and tactical performance of basketball practitioners.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信