淋喷头冷却对涡轮叶片吸入侧气膜冷却效果的影响

Marcia I. Ethridge, J. M. Cutbirth, D. Bogard
{"title":"淋喷头冷却对涡轮叶片吸入侧气膜冷却效果的影响","authors":"Marcia I. Ethridge, J. M. Cutbirth, D. Bogard","doi":"10.1115/imece2000-1462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The process of film cooling is known to severely disturb the boundary layer around a turbine airfoil. Since most film-cooled airfoils have more than one injection station, the flow field approaching a row of film cooling holes could be altered by the presence of an upstream cooling station. To investigate this possibility, an experimental investigation was conducted on the suction side of a scaled-up turbine vane. Adiabatic effectiveness measurements were made downstream of a single row of cooling holes both with and without the upstream showerhead holes operating. A range of suction side blowing ratios, 0.3 ≤ M ≤ 1.3, were investigated with large-scale mainstream turbulence intensities of Tu∞ = 0.5% and Tu∞ = 21%. The effects of the showerhead coolant were evaluated at an engine-typical showerhead blowing ratio of Msh = 1.6, with three of the six rows of cooling holes in the showerhead directed towards the suction side of the airfoil. Experiments were conducted with a coolant-to-mainstream density ratio of DR = 1.6. An infrared camera was used to obtain spatially-resolved surface temperature measurements, which were corrected for conduction effects and converted to adiabatic effectiveness. The results showed that showerhead coolant had a strong impact on suction side adiabatic effectiveness levels under low mainstream turbulence. Although effectiveness levels increased with the showerhead operating, the suction side coolant jets increased dispersion of the showerhead coolant. Under high mainstream turbulence conditions, there was very little interaction between the showerhead coolant and the suction side coolant jets. Adiabatic effectiveness levels were considerably lower than those for the low turbulence case, which was partially due to increased dispersion of the showerhead coolant upstream of the suction side holes. The superposition model over-predicted adiabatic effectiveness levels under low mainstream turbulence conditions, but was very effective in predicting the combined performance of the showerhead and the suction side cooling holes under high mainstream turbulence conditions.","PeriodicalId":306962,"journal":{"name":"Heat Transfer: Volume 3","volume":"98 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Showerhead Cooling on Turbine Vane Suction Side Film Cooling Effectiveness\",\"authors\":\"Marcia I. Ethridge, J. M. Cutbirth, D. Bogard\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/imece2000-1462\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The process of film cooling is known to severely disturb the boundary layer around a turbine airfoil. Since most film-cooled airfoils have more than one injection station, the flow field approaching a row of film cooling holes could be altered by the presence of an upstream cooling station. To investigate this possibility, an experimental investigation was conducted on the suction side of a scaled-up turbine vane. Adiabatic effectiveness measurements were made downstream of a single row of cooling holes both with and without the upstream showerhead holes operating. A range of suction side blowing ratios, 0.3 ≤ M ≤ 1.3, were investigated with large-scale mainstream turbulence intensities of Tu∞ = 0.5% and Tu∞ = 21%. The effects of the showerhead coolant were evaluated at an engine-typical showerhead blowing ratio of Msh = 1.6, with three of the six rows of cooling holes in the showerhead directed towards the suction side of the airfoil. Experiments were conducted with a coolant-to-mainstream density ratio of DR = 1.6. An infrared camera was used to obtain spatially-resolved surface temperature measurements, which were corrected for conduction effects and converted to adiabatic effectiveness. The results showed that showerhead coolant had a strong impact on suction side adiabatic effectiveness levels under low mainstream turbulence. Although effectiveness levels increased with the showerhead operating, the suction side coolant jets increased dispersion of the showerhead coolant. Under high mainstream turbulence conditions, there was very little interaction between the showerhead coolant and the suction side coolant jets. Adiabatic effectiveness levels were considerably lower than those for the low turbulence case, which was partially due to increased dispersion of the showerhead coolant upstream of the suction side holes. The superposition model over-predicted adiabatic effectiveness levels under low mainstream turbulence conditions, but was very effective in predicting the combined performance of the showerhead and the suction side cooling holes under high mainstream turbulence conditions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":306962,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heat Transfer: Volume 3\",\"volume\":\"98 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heat Transfer: Volume 3\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2000-1462\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heat Transfer: Volume 3","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2000-1462","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

众所周知,气膜冷却的过程会严重干扰涡轮翼型周围的边界层。由于大多数气膜冷却翼型有一个以上的注入站,流场接近一排气膜冷却孔可能被上游冷却站的存在改变。为了研究这种可能性,在一个按比例放大的涡轮叶片的吸力侧进行了实验研究。在有和没有上游喷头孔运行的情况下,对单排冷却孔的下游进行了绝热有效性测量。在大尺度主流湍流强度Tu∞= 0.5%和Tu∞= 21%的条件下,研究了0.3≤M≤1.3的吸力侧吹比范围。在典型的Msh = 1.6的淋浴喷头吹气比下,对淋浴喷头冷却剂的效果进行了评估,其中6排冷却孔中的3排指向翼型的吸力侧。在冷却液与主流密度比DR = 1.6的条件下进行实验。利用红外相机获得了空间分辨的表面温度测量值,并对传导效应进行了校正,转换为绝热效应。结果表明,在低主流湍流度条件下,淋喷头冷却剂对吸力侧绝热效能水平有较大影响。虽然效率水平随着淋浴喷头的运行而提高,但吸力侧冷却剂喷射增加了淋浴喷头冷却剂的分散。在高主流湍流条件下,淋喷头冷却剂与吸力侧冷却剂射流之间的相互作用很小。绝热效率水平明显低于低湍流情况,部分原因是由于在吸力侧孔上游的淋喷头冷却剂弥散增加。叠加模型对低主流湍流条件下的绝热效能水平预测过高,但对高主流湍流条件下淋喷头和吸力侧冷却孔的综合性能预测非常有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of Showerhead Cooling on Turbine Vane Suction Side Film Cooling Effectiveness
The process of film cooling is known to severely disturb the boundary layer around a turbine airfoil. Since most film-cooled airfoils have more than one injection station, the flow field approaching a row of film cooling holes could be altered by the presence of an upstream cooling station. To investigate this possibility, an experimental investigation was conducted on the suction side of a scaled-up turbine vane. Adiabatic effectiveness measurements were made downstream of a single row of cooling holes both with and without the upstream showerhead holes operating. A range of suction side blowing ratios, 0.3 ≤ M ≤ 1.3, were investigated with large-scale mainstream turbulence intensities of Tu∞ = 0.5% and Tu∞ = 21%. The effects of the showerhead coolant were evaluated at an engine-typical showerhead blowing ratio of Msh = 1.6, with three of the six rows of cooling holes in the showerhead directed towards the suction side of the airfoil. Experiments were conducted with a coolant-to-mainstream density ratio of DR = 1.6. An infrared camera was used to obtain spatially-resolved surface temperature measurements, which were corrected for conduction effects and converted to adiabatic effectiveness. The results showed that showerhead coolant had a strong impact on suction side adiabatic effectiveness levels under low mainstream turbulence. Although effectiveness levels increased with the showerhead operating, the suction side coolant jets increased dispersion of the showerhead coolant. Under high mainstream turbulence conditions, there was very little interaction between the showerhead coolant and the suction side coolant jets. Adiabatic effectiveness levels were considerably lower than those for the low turbulence case, which was partially due to increased dispersion of the showerhead coolant upstream of the suction side holes. The superposition model over-predicted adiabatic effectiveness levels under low mainstream turbulence conditions, but was very effective in predicting the combined performance of the showerhead and the suction side cooling holes under high mainstream turbulence conditions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信