为基于组件的设计检查使用自动化证明义务

M. Rangarajan, P. Alexander, N. Abu-Ghazaleh
{"title":"为基于组件的设计检查使用自动化证明义务","authors":"M. Rangarajan, P. Alexander, N. Abu-Ghazaleh","doi":"10.1109/ECBS.1999.755895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The complexity of modern systems is reflected in a proportionate increase in the complexity of their design and verification. Formal analysis methods are of particular interest because they provide the mathematical foundation necessary for rigorous analysis; successful formal analysis of a system provides a high level of assurance of correctness and conformance with specifications. Unfortunately for a number of reasons, formal analysis techniques have failed to scale to large systems. In traditional engineering disciplines, decomposition and component-based design activities have contributed substantially to effective design of large systems. Consequently, this paper presents some proof obligations that perform partial correctness checks on hierarchically designed systems. Since the obligations are applied locally, they avoid the state explosion associated with formal analysis of a large system. The obligations represent initial steps towards the goal of decompositional verification of designs.","PeriodicalId":229109,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings ECBS'99. IEEE Conference and Workshop on Engineering of Computer-Based Systems","volume":"516 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using automatable proof obligations for component-based design checking\",\"authors\":\"M. Rangarajan, P. Alexander, N. Abu-Ghazaleh\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ECBS.1999.755895\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The complexity of modern systems is reflected in a proportionate increase in the complexity of their design and verification. Formal analysis methods are of particular interest because they provide the mathematical foundation necessary for rigorous analysis; successful formal analysis of a system provides a high level of assurance of correctness and conformance with specifications. Unfortunately for a number of reasons, formal analysis techniques have failed to scale to large systems. In traditional engineering disciplines, decomposition and component-based design activities have contributed substantially to effective design of large systems. Consequently, this paper presents some proof obligations that perform partial correctness checks on hierarchically designed systems. Since the obligations are applied locally, they avoid the state explosion associated with formal analysis of a large system. The obligations represent initial steps towards the goal of decompositional verification of designs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":229109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings ECBS'99. IEEE Conference and Workshop on Engineering of Computer-Based Systems\",\"volume\":\"516 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings ECBS'99. IEEE Conference and Workshop on Engineering of Computer-Based Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ECBS.1999.755895\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings ECBS'99. IEEE Conference and Workshop on Engineering of Computer-Based Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ECBS.1999.755895","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

现代系统的复杂性反映在其设计和验证的复杂性成比例地增加。形式分析方法特别有趣,因为它们为严格的分析提供了必要的数学基础;成功的系统形式化分析为正确性和与规范的一致性提供了高度的保证。不幸的是,由于许多原因,形式分析技术无法扩展到大型系统。在传统的工程学科中,分解和基于组件的设计活动对大型系统的有效设计做出了重大贡献。因此,本文提出了一些对分层设计的系统执行部分正确性检查的证明义务。由于义务是局部应用的,因此它们避免了与大型系统的形式化分析相关的状态爆炸。这些义务是朝着设计的分解核查目标迈出的初步步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using automatable proof obligations for component-based design checking
The complexity of modern systems is reflected in a proportionate increase in the complexity of their design and verification. Formal analysis methods are of particular interest because they provide the mathematical foundation necessary for rigorous analysis; successful formal analysis of a system provides a high level of assurance of correctness and conformance with specifications. Unfortunately for a number of reasons, formal analysis techniques have failed to scale to large systems. In traditional engineering disciplines, decomposition and component-based design activities have contributed substantially to effective design of large systems. Consequently, this paper presents some proof obligations that perform partial correctness checks on hierarchically designed systems. Since the obligations are applied locally, they avoid the state explosion associated with formal analysis of a large system. The obligations represent initial steps towards the goal of decompositional verification of designs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信