公共卫生背景下"疾病"概念的差异:(第一部分——分析性研究)

O. Berdnyk, T. Skochko, O. Dobrianska, О. Rudnytska
{"title":"公共卫生背景下\"疾病\"概念的差异:(第一部分——分析性研究)","authors":"O. Berdnyk, T. Skochko, O. Dobrianska, О. Rudnytska","doi":"10.32402/dovkil2022.03.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Target. From the standpoint of public health, analyze scientific literature data and terminology related to various hypostases / manifestations of malady. Materials and methods. The analysis of domestic and foreign publications devoted to terminological issues of assessing various aspects of the incidence of the population. Results. The state of research concerning various aspects of the concept of \"disorder\" in the scientific domestic and foreign literature has been determined. A review of the scientific literature revealed a lack of theoretical provisions on this topic that could be generalized, compared and contrasted. In everyday English, the use of concepts to describe malady (disease, illness, sickness, etc.) is often seen as arbitrary, and in the scientific field, they are the subject of professional discussions. For Ukraine, the analysis of malady terminology is new. The designation of the space for the use of certain terms is important, since the study of various aspects of the malady involves the use of various methods of collecting information, interpreting the data obtained, conclusions about ways to overcome disorders, etc. The definition of malady is not only a theoretical issue: it is important for medicine, social policy and the health care system in general. For public health, which is the most socially oriented branch of medicine, it is extremely important to take into account not only the purely biomedical (disease), but also the social (sickness) aspects of the disorders, as well as its self-esteem (illness).The combination and interrelation of various hypostases of the disorders included in the Twaddle triad is considered, a comparative analysis of its components has been carried out. The relevance of the analysis of the morbidity of the population and the justification of the most effective health-improving measures determines the advisability of taking into account various hypostases of ill health, and given the multidisciplinary nature of public health, the involvement of specialists in various fields.","PeriodicalId":144023,"journal":{"name":"Environment & Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The difference of the concept of \\\"malady\\\" in the context of public health: (part 1 - analytical research)\",\"authors\":\"O. Berdnyk, T. Skochko, O. Dobrianska, О. Rudnytska\",\"doi\":\"10.32402/dovkil2022.03.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Target. From the standpoint of public health, analyze scientific literature data and terminology related to various hypostases / manifestations of malady. Materials and methods. The analysis of domestic and foreign publications devoted to terminological issues of assessing various aspects of the incidence of the population. Results. The state of research concerning various aspects of the concept of \\\"disorder\\\" in the scientific domestic and foreign literature has been determined. A review of the scientific literature revealed a lack of theoretical provisions on this topic that could be generalized, compared and contrasted. In everyday English, the use of concepts to describe malady (disease, illness, sickness, etc.) is often seen as arbitrary, and in the scientific field, they are the subject of professional discussions. For Ukraine, the analysis of malady terminology is new. The designation of the space for the use of certain terms is important, since the study of various aspects of the malady involves the use of various methods of collecting information, interpreting the data obtained, conclusions about ways to overcome disorders, etc. The definition of malady is not only a theoretical issue: it is important for medicine, social policy and the health care system in general. For public health, which is the most socially oriented branch of medicine, it is extremely important to take into account not only the purely biomedical (disease), but also the social (sickness) aspects of the disorders, as well as its self-esteem (illness).The combination and interrelation of various hypostases of the disorders included in the Twaddle triad is considered, a comparative analysis of its components has been carried out. The relevance of the analysis of the morbidity of the population and the justification of the most effective health-improving measures determines the advisability of taking into account various hypostases of ill health, and given the multidisciplinary nature of public health, the involvement of specialists in various fields.\",\"PeriodicalId\":144023,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environment & Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environment & Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32402/dovkil2022.03.004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment & Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32402/dovkil2022.03.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目标。从公共卫生的角度,分析与疾病的各种实质/表现有关的科学文献数据和术语。材料和方法。分析国内和国外的出版物,专门讨论评估人口发病率的各个方面的术语问题。结果。国内外科学文献中关于“障碍”概念的各个方面的研究状况已经确定。通过对科学文献的回顾发现,关于这一主题缺乏可以概括、比较和对比的理论规定。在日常英语中,使用概念来描述疾病(疾病,疾病,疾病等)通常被认为是武断的,在科学领域,它们是专业讨论的主题。对乌克兰来说,对疾病术语的分析是新的。指定使用某些术语的空间是很重要的,因为对这种疾病的各个方面的研究涉及使用各种收集信息的方法、解释所获得的数据、关于克服疾病的方法的结论等。疾病的定义不仅是一个理论问题:它对医学、社会政策和一般的卫生保健系统都很重要。公共卫生是最面向社会的医学分支,因此极为重要的是,不仅要考虑到纯粹的生物医学(疾病),而且要考虑到疾病的社会(疾病)方面及其自尊(疾病)。考虑了Twaddle三位一体中包括的各种疾病的组合和相互关系,并对其组成部分进行了比较分析。人口发病率分析的相关性和最有效的改善健康措施的合理性决定了考虑到各种健康状况不佳的本质是明智的,并且鉴于公共卫生的多学科性质,需要各领域专家的参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The difference of the concept of "malady" in the context of public health: (part 1 - analytical research)
Target. From the standpoint of public health, analyze scientific literature data and terminology related to various hypostases / manifestations of malady. Materials and methods. The analysis of domestic and foreign publications devoted to terminological issues of assessing various aspects of the incidence of the population. Results. The state of research concerning various aspects of the concept of "disorder" in the scientific domestic and foreign literature has been determined. A review of the scientific literature revealed a lack of theoretical provisions on this topic that could be generalized, compared and contrasted. In everyday English, the use of concepts to describe malady (disease, illness, sickness, etc.) is often seen as arbitrary, and in the scientific field, they are the subject of professional discussions. For Ukraine, the analysis of malady terminology is new. The designation of the space for the use of certain terms is important, since the study of various aspects of the malady involves the use of various methods of collecting information, interpreting the data obtained, conclusions about ways to overcome disorders, etc. The definition of malady is not only a theoretical issue: it is important for medicine, social policy and the health care system in general. For public health, which is the most socially oriented branch of medicine, it is extremely important to take into account not only the purely biomedical (disease), but also the social (sickness) aspects of the disorders, as well as its self-esteem (illness).The combination and interrelation of various hypostases of the disorders included in the Twaddle triad is considered, a comparative analysis of its components has been carried out. The relevance of the analysis of the morbidity of the population and the justification of the most effective health-improving measures determines the advisability of taking into account various hypostases of ill health, and given the multidisciplinary nature of public health, the involvement of specialists in various fields.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信