{"title":"类比推理","authors":"Susan I. McMahon, Sonya G. Bonneau","doi":"10.4324/9781315144016-14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter from our book Legal Writing in Context aims to demystify analogical reasoning for law students. We break down why, exactly, this muddy and controversial form of reasoning has become such a bedrock of legal analysis and provide specific suggestions for how to construct effective analogies in legal writing.","PeriodicalId":416511,"journal":{"name":"EduRN: Legal Scholarship Education (LSN) (Topic)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analogical Reasoning\",\"authors\":\"Susan I. McMahon, Sonya G. Bonneau\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9781315144016-14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter from our book Legal Writing in Context aims to demystify analogical reasoning for law students. We break down why, exactly, this muddy and controversial form of reasoning has become such a bedrock of legal analysis and provide specific suggestions for how to construct effective analogies in legal writing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":416511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EduRN: Legal Scholarship Education (LSN) (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EduRN: Legal Scholarship Education (LSN) (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315144016-14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EduRN: Legal Scholarship Education (LSN) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315144016-14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
This chapter from our book Legal Writing in Context aims to demystify analogical reasoning for law students. We break down why, exactly, this muddy and controversial form of reasoning has become such a bedrock of legal analysis and provide specific suggestions for how to construct effective analogies in legal writing.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
