从一组标准中提取用于评估网站质量的关联规则

Rim Rekik, I. Kallel, A. Alimi
{"title":"从一组标准中提取用于评估网站质量的关联规则","authors":"Rim Rekik, I. Kallel, A. Alimi","doi":"10.1109/HIS.2014.7086164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The amount of circulating data on the internet has witnessed a considerable increase during the last decades. A web site is the main source that provides users' needs. However, some of the existing web sites are not well intentioned by users. Many studies have treated the problem of assessing the web sites' quality of different categories such as ecommerce, education, entertainment, health, etc. The problematic implies a multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) due to the multiple conflicting criteria for assessment. Existing methods are mainly based on making a hierarchy to divide high level criteria, sub-level criteria and alternatives. There is no standard until now that defines important criteria for evaluation. Indeed, this paper presents a process of collecting and extracting data from a list of studies according to a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method. In fact, it is necessary to know frequent criteria used in the literature for establishing the task of assessment. This paper proposes also a determination of an association rules' set extracted from a set of criteria by applying an Apriori method.","PeriodicalId":161103,"journal":{"name":"2014 14th International Conference on Hybrid Intelligent Systems","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extraction of association rules used for assessing web sites' quality from a set of criteria\",\"authors\":\"Rim Rekik, I. Kallel, A. Alimi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/HIS.2014.7086164\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The amount of circulating data on the internet has witnessed a considerable increase during the last decades. A web site is the main source that provides users' needs. However, some of the existing web sites are not well intentioned by users. Many studies have treated the problem of assessing the web sites' quality of different categories such as ecommerce, education, entertainment, health, etc. The problematic implies a multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) due to the multiple conflicting criteria for assessment. Existing methods are mainly based on making a hierarchy to divide high level criteria, sub-level criteria and alternatives. There is no standard until now that defines important criteria for evaluation. Indeed, this paper presents a process of collecting and extracting data from a list of studies according to a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method. In fact, it is necessary to know frequent criteria used in the literature for establishing the task of assessment. This paper proposes also a determination of an association rules' set extracted from a set of criteria by applying an Apriori method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":161103,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 14th International Conference on Hybrid Intelligent Systems\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 14th International Conference on Hybrid Intelligent Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/HIS.2014.7086164\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 14th International Conference on Hybrid Intelligent Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HIS.2014.7086164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

在过去的几十年里,互联网上流通的数据量有了相当大的增长。网站是提供用户需求的主要来源。然而,一些现有的网站并不是出于用户的好意。许多研究已经处理了评估不同类别网站质量的问题,如电子商务、教育、娱乐、健康等。由于多个相互冲突的评估标准,该问题暗示了多标准决策(MCDM)。现有的方法主要基于建立层次结构来划分高层标准、下级标准和备选方案。到目前为止,还没有标准定义评估的重要标准。实际上,本文介绍了一个根据系统文献综述(SLR)方法从研究列表中收集和提取数据的过程。事实上,有必要了解文献中常用的标准,以确定评估任务。本文还提出了一种应用Apriori方法从一组标准中提取关联规则集的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Extraction of association rules used for assessing web sites' quality from a set of criteria
The amount of circulating data on the internet has witnessed a considerable increase during the last decades. A web site is the main source that provides users' needs. However, some of the existing web sites are not well intentioned by users. Many studies have treated the problem of assessing the web sites' quality of different categories such as ecommerce, education, entertainment, health, etc. The problematic implies a multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) due to the multiple conflicting criteria for assessment. Existing methods are mainly based on making a hierarchy to divide high level criteria, sub-level criteria and alternatives. There is no standard until now that defines important criteria for evaluation. Indeed, this paper presents a process of collecting and extracting data from a list of studies according to a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method. In fact, it is necessary to know frequent criteria used in the literature for establishing the task of assessment. This paper proposes also a determination of an association rules' set extracted from a set of criteria by applying an Apriori method.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信