近对称碰撞场景下的有效人机协作

Grimaldo Silva, A. Olivier, A. Crétual, J. Pettré, Thierry Fraichard
{"title":"近对称碰撞场景下的有效人机协作","authors":"Grimaldo Silva, A. Olivier, A. Crétual, J. Pettré, Thierry Fraichard","doi":"10.1109/RO-MAN46459.2019.8956360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent works in the domain of Human-Robot Motion (HRM) attempted to plan collision avoidance behavior that accounts for cooperation between agents. Cooperative collision avoidance between humans and robots should be conducted under several factors such as speed, heading and also human attention and intention. Based on some of these factors, people decide their crossing order during collision avoidance. However, whenever situations arise in which the choice crossing order is not consistent for people, the robot is forced to account for the possibility that both agents will assume the same role i.e. a decision detrimental to collision avoidance. In our work we evaluate the boundary that separates the decision to avoid collision as first or last crosser. Approximating the uncertainty around this boundary allows our collision avoidance strategy to address this problem based on the insight that the robot should plan its collision avoidance motion in such a way that, even if agents, at first, incorrectly choose the same crossing order, they would be able to unambiguously perceive their crossing order on their following collision avoidance action.","PeriodicalId":286478,"journal":{"name":"2019 28th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)","volume":"203 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effective Human-Robot Collaboration in near symmetry collision scenarios\",\"authors\":\"Grimaldo Silva, A. Olivier, A. Crétual, J. Pettré, Thierry Fraichard\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RO-MAN46459.2019.8956360\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recent works in the domain of Human-Robot Motion (HRM) attempted to plan collision avoidance behavior that accounts for cooperation between agents. Cooperative collision avoidance between humans and robots should be conducted under several factors such as speed, heading and also human attention and intention. Based on some of these factors, people decide their crossing order during collision avoidance. However, whenever situations arise in which the choice crossing order is not consistent for people, the robot is forced to account for the possibility that both agents will assume the same role i.e. a decision detrimental to collision avoidance. In our work we evaluate the boundary that separates the decision to avoid collision as first or last crosser. Approximating the uncertainty around this boundary allows our collision avoidance strategy to address this problem based on the insight that the robot should plan its collision avoidance motion in such a way that, even if agents, at first, incorrectly choose the same crossing order, they would be able to unambiguously perceive their crossing order on their following collision avoidance action.\",\"PeriodicalId\":286478,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 28th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)\",\"volume\":\"203 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 28th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN46459.2019.8956360\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 28th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN46459.2019.8956360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

最近在人-机器人运动(HRM)领域的工作试图规划碰撞避免行为,考虑代理之间的合作。人与机器人之间的协同避碰需要在速度、航向以及人的注意力和意图等几个因素下进行。在避碰过程中,人们根据这些因素来决定自己的穿越顺序。然而,每当人们的选择交叉顺序不一致的情况出现时,机器人被迫考虑两个代理将承担相同角色的可能性,即不利于避免碰撞的决定。在我们的工作中,我们评估将避免碰撞的决定作为第一个或最后一个交叉的边界。近似这个边界的不确定性使我们的避碰策略能够解决这个问题,基于机器人应该以这样一种方式来规划其避碰运动,即使代理最初错误地选择了相同的交叉顺序,他们也能够明确地感知到他们接下来的避碰动作的交叉顺序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effective Human-Robot Collaboration in near symmetry collision scenarios
Recent works in the domain of Human-Robot Motion (HRM) attempted to plan collision avoidance behavior that accounts for cooperation between agents. Cooperative collision avoidance between humans and robots should be conducted under several factors such as speed, heading and also human attention and intention. Based on some of these factors, people decide their crossing order during collision avoidance. However, whenever situations arise in which the choice crossing order is not consistent for people, the robot is forced to account for the possibility that both agents will assume the same role i.e. a decision detrimental to collision avoidance. In our work we evaluate the boundary that separates the decision to avoid collision as first or last crosser. Approximating the uncertainty around this boundary allows our collision avoidance strategy to address this problem based on the insight that the robot should plan its collision avoidance motion in such a way that, even if agents, at first, incorrectly choose the same crossing order, they would be able to unambiguously perceive their crossing order on their following collision avoidance action.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信